Element Creating Machine/ Simplest Formula To Change The Universe

[GreatScott1]

Chain fusion then chain fission
repeat

1 Hydrogen > Uranium
2 Uranium > Hydrogen
3 repeat

simplest formula of cyclical chain nuclear fusion/fission reaction


This is the element modifying formula

This will change the world

Theoretical will become practical

with radioactive protection that will be developed sooner, or later, or never, and this will make humans create, modify or destroy elements (material)

as they feel like.




Element creating/modifying vending machines or for homes use to create periodic table elements (discovered and undiscovered)

there are possibly 1000s of undiscovered periodic elements that is human made so incomplete aliens have bigger periodic tables with 1000s of elements

These will also be terraforming, atmosphere forming machines (xxxl industrial)

add to them lab made extremely fast evolving single cell organisms that evolve billion times quicker than normal evolution

u create and destroy planets with life on them at will

u create universes or destroy them

u can create lab made plants, fruits, vegetables.

 

this may change the world or its absolutely nothing

Chain fission

Chain fusion


Chain fission (many fission processes)

Heavy element breaks down over and over until becomes hydrogen, helium or subatomic particles (keep going after that if possible)

So that's like pattern in the night sky (tree constellation)

there's another tree constellation that is upside down reverse V

this chain fission is that probably

universe giving us hints

use this information for positive contributions only


Fission 1: Uranium/Plut../etc becomes smaller elements f1
Fission 2: f1 becomes f2
Fission 3: f2 becomes f3
...
Fission z: fz becomes hydrogen/helium/smaller subatomic particle


chain fission ^

are they doing this or not ? if not then start working


then after that use these particles to chain fuse them back to uranium/plot/heavy elements

Chain fission > chain fusion

cyclical process

same material used over and over if possible

I think fusion requires energy instead of giving off energy

it requires energy to fuse two elements

Chain fusion is better (its theoretical) because it will require easily available material anywhere to start process of chain reaction CHEAPER

sand particles could be used!

Chain fusion

Fusion 1: subatomic particle/hydrogen becomes f1 (helium)
Fusion 2: f1(helium) becomes f2(bigger)
Fusion 3: f2 becomes f3
...
Fusion z: fz becomes uranium/plu../ heavy element particle


These cyclical chain nuclear reaction machines may also serve as terraforming machines in the future.

Portable VSP (very small portable) CCNRMs - nano-pico sized as viruses but positive viruses
VLI CCNRMs (very large industrial) - for terraforming


theyll solve all problems as ppl find out their usage

like create water
atmosphere
create heat for cold harsh environments away from the sun (pluto uranus nepture jupiter etc) by nuclear reactions of ofcourse
create cold for hot environments by freezing (mercury venus)

They'll find ways to protect from radioactivity (there will be a solution)

colonize the solar system then move on

self replicating automated

follow nature's biology to copy it


Thank u total recall (original)


Chain fusion > Chain fission > Chain fusion > chain fusion > ... on and on

or

one fusion > one fission > one fusion process > one fission > on and on...


Chain fusion to Chai fission then back a cyclical process seems more interesting pursuit.


This way we might create universes!

like start with subatomic

make them hydrogen

until uranium or heavier

create elements in lab

"we will be like gods" says lucifer/satan

he was right

He was right

humans will become like gods

Is this too much info before YHWH destroys mankind creates another matrix?

we've been destroyed 6 times before

each time we go too far god or creator of this matrix ends it wipes out our memory

 

[Sensei]

... you would have to surround the Sun and everything by Dyson Sphere, to disallow energy escape out of it, to be able to utilize it for much longer time than now..

e.g. fusion releases energy, energy is harvested, gathered and used to split existing heavier isotopes, to lighter isotopes and then to Hydrogen-1 or Deuterium, and basic fusion fuel bring back to the Sun, where it can again being used for fusion. Iron could be used to cool down the Sun to disallow going to red giant phase of star evolution. There are needed simulations of star, what will happen with star if some isotopes of heavier elements are bring to star.

Edited March 15, 2019 by Sensei

[Phi for All]

45 minutes ago, GreatScott1 said:

"we will be like gods" says lucifer/satan

he was right

He was right

humans will become like gods

Is this too much info before YHWH destroys mankind creates another matrix?

we've been destroyed 6 times before

each time we go too far god or creator of this matrix ends it wipes out our memory

!

Moderator Note

If you're posting about a science topic, please leave your religion out of it. It's against the rules you agreed to when you joined.

 

[Strange]

!

Moderator Note

I have given this the benefit of the doubt and moved it to the Speculations forum. (There is so little of any credibility here, I think it belongs in Trash, but let's see what happens.) Please see the rules for this part of the forum; in particular the need to provide evidence for your claims.

 

56 minutes ago, GreatScott1 said:

Element creating/modifying vending machines or for homes use to create periodic table elements (discovered and undiscovered)

Why do you think this is possible?

56 minutes ago, GreatScott1 said:

there are possibly 1000s of undiscovered periodic elements that is human made so incomplete aliens have bigger periodic tables with 1000s of elements

No. We know that any elements above uranium are unstable.

57 minutes ago, GreatScott1 said:

I think fusion requires energy instead of giving off energy

Maybe you should find out, instead of guessing.

The Sun, for example, generates its energy from nuclear fusion.

 

[Sensei]

9 minutes ago, Strange said:

No. We know that any elements above uranium are unstable.

Uranium is unstable as well..

 

[Strange]

19 minutes ago, Sensei said:

Uranium is unstable as well..

 

True. (And many isotopes below uranium.)

But I was really thinking of the "1000s of undiscovered periodic elements."

[Sensei]

26 minutes ago, Strange said:

But I was really thinking of the "1000s of undiscovered periodic elements." 

There are exotic atoms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_atom

They are unstable because their nuclei is made of unstable particles.

Any charged particle, positively charged meson or baryon can have electron-cloud, or opposite charged particle cloud, around it.. so it is just a matter of discovering exceptionally long stable or absolutely stable particle, to replace normal protons role in ordinary atoms. It would open completely new exotic atoms chemistry..

 

Edited March 15, 2019 by Sensei

[Strange]

21 minutes ago, Sensei said:

There are exotic atoms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_atom

It would be pretty exciting if any of those were stable enough to be useful...

[GreatScott1]

On 3/16/2019 at 12:12 AM, Sensei said:

... you would have to surround the Sun and everything by Dyson Sphere, to disallow energy escape out of it, to be able to utilize it for much longer time than now..

e.g. fusion releases energy, energy is harvested, gathered and used to split existing heavier isotopes, to lighter isotopes and then to Hydrogen-1 or Deuterium, and basic fusion fuel bring back to the Sun, where it can again being used for fusion. Iron could be used to cool down the Sun to disallow going to red giant phase of star evolution. There are needed simulations of star, what will happen with star if some isotopes of heavier elements are bring to star.

 

Fusion is theoretically possible outside stellar evolution. If matter is sufficiently heated (hence being plasma), fusion reactions may occur due to collisions with extreme thermal kinetic energies of the particles. Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) is a method aimed at releasing fusion energy by heating and compressing a fuel target, typically a pellet containing deuterium and tritium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter-catalyzed_nuclear_pulse_propulsion

 

so on

 

 

 

On 3/16/2019 at 12:36 AM, Sensei said:

Uranium is unstable as well..

 

Unstable elements can theoretically (soon practically) be stabilized. For example, if we individually stabilize each layer of electrons surrounding the nucleus through strong inter-electron bonds or strong covalent bonds or find a method to make them stop emitting radioactive decaying material or we could apply filters to prevent out pour of radioactive flow.

 

Wrap these materials around 'radioactive' ergo unstable element you'll get them stabilized i am sure. Fukushima disaster was preventable i am sure.

 

Very rough drawings but you get the idea

 

 

 

It's more than possible don't be negative people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton–proton_chain_reaction

 

 

 

[Strange]

35 minutes ago, GreatScott1 said:

Unstable elements can theoretically (soon practically) be stabilized.

Citation needed.

 

[swansont]

2 hours ago, GreatScott1 said:

Unstable elements can theoretically (soon practically) be stabilized. For example, if we individually stabilize each layer of electrons surrounding the nucleus through strong inter-electron bonds or strong covalent bonds or find a method to make them stop emitting radioactive decaying material or we could apply filters to prevent out pour of radioactive flow.

No, not so much.

2 hours ago, GreatScott1 said:

Wrap these materials around 'radioactive' ergo unstable element you'll get them stabilized i am sure.

No.

[Sensei]

3 hours ago, GreatScott1 said:

Unstable elements can theoretically (soon practically) be stabilized. For example, if we individually stabilize each layer of electrons surrounding the nucleus through strong inter-electron bonds or strong covalent bonds or find a method to make them stop emitting radioactive decaying material or we could apply filters to prevent out pour of radioactive flow. 

Unstable particles, unstable isotopes decay regardless of their electron-cloud. It's nucleus which is decaying. The one of a very few exceptions from it is electron-capture. Fully ionized nucleus cannot decay via electron-capture, as it has no electrons to capture..

 

 

[Bufofrog]

On 3/15/2019 at 2:28 PM, GreatScott1 said:

Chain fusion then chain fission
repeat

1 Hydrogen > Uranium
2 Uranium > Hydrogen
3 repeat

simplest formula of cyclical chain nuclear fusion/fission reaction


This is the element modifying formula

This will change the world

Too bad it is impossible to even approach feasibility.

[GreatScott1]

8 hours ago, Sensei said:

Unstable particles, unstable isotopes decay regardless of their electron-cloud. It's nucleus which is decaying. The one of a very few exceptions from it is electron-capture. Fully ionized nucleus cannot decay via electron-capture, as it has no electrons to capture..

 

 

 

So can these unstable elements their nuclei be fully ionized or some other method to stabilize them? Without electron movement they're useless? I think not.

[Bufofrog]

1 hour ago, GreatScott1 said:

 

So can these unstable elements their nuclei be fully ionized or some other method to stabilize them?

No.

[swansont]

3 hours ago, GreatScott1 said:

So can these unstable elements their nuclei be fully ionized or some other method to stabilize them? Without electron movement they're useless? I think not.

"Useless"? That characterization seems very odd.

It's not the absence of electron movement, it's the absence of electrons, and only for this one type of decay.

 

[GreatScott1]

17 hours ago, swansont said:

"Useless"? That characterization seems very odd.

It's not the absence of electron movement, it's the absence of electrons, and only for this one type of decay.

 

 

Thanks.