studiot Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 18 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: I don' t understand what that means. Sorry, the stupid editor here post my input when I try to use the tab key. The post is complete now.
Dimosthenis76 Posted March 25, 2019 Author Posted March 25, 2019 10 minutes ago, studiot said: The complex wave function Ψ is a solution of Schrondingers equation. Can we at least deal with it before you continue your example? My English again. Deal with is a phrasal berb, I wanted to say to have a deal.
studiot Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: Can we at least deal with it before you continue your example? OK what do you want to say about it?
Dimosthenis76 Posted March 25, 2019 Author Posted March 25, 2019 (edited) 24 minutes ago, studiot said: The complex wave function Ψ is a solution of Schrondingers equation. Do you agree with this statement? Edited March 25, 2019 by Dimosthenis76
swansont Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 3 hours ago, Dimosthenis76 said: Show me the experiment. You haven't explained how Born's rule fails. I want to know what should be happening, according to you, in what I have described.
studiot Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 13 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: Do you agree with this statement? Well yes, sort of. It is incomplete by itself.
Phi for All Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 7 hours ago, Dimosthenis76 said: CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS.pdf ! Moderator Note This is a speculative work in itself, so you can't use it to support further speculation. You'll have to have this paper discussed in a thread all by itself.
Dimosthenis76 Posted March 25, 2019 Author Posted March 25, 2019 15 minutes ago, Phi for All said: ! Moderator Note This is a speculative work in itself, so you can't use it to support further speculation. You'll have to have this paper discussed in a thread all by itself. Speculative? Speculation? What do you mean? Its just a theory with two suggestions for experimental verification. I ll discuss it in a thread all by itself as you like, as soon as I finish this conversation. 25 minutes ago, studiot said: Well yes, sort of. It is incomplete by itself. Ok keep it. Go on with your example.
Phi for All Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Dimosthenis76 said: Its just a theory ! Moderator Note It is most certainly NOT a theory. A theory is NOT a guess. A theory is the best current explanation we currently have for a particular phenomenon. It's the best science has to offer. Does that describe your paper? NO. You don't need to respond to moderator notes, you just have to follow the rules mentioned in them.
studiot Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 7 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: Go on with your example. 1 hour ago, studiot said: This brings us right back to my simplified examples with a bag of red and blue balss that you were too high and mighty to consider. So are you going to respond to my questions about the bag of balls? Or do you expect to be the only speaker at this conference? 8 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: Ok keep it. I do not understand what you are saying? I have good (mathematical) reasons for my reticence.
Dimosthenis76 Posted March 25, 2019 Author Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Phi for All said: ! Moderator Note It is most certainly NOT a theory. A theory is NOT a guess. A theory is the best current explanation we currently have for a particular phenomenon. It's the best science has to offer. Does that describe your paper? NO. You don't need to respond to moderator notes, you just have to follow the rules mentioned in them. That's just your opinion. If the suggested experiments work, we talk if it is or if it is not a theory. 2 minutes ago, studiot said: So are you going to respond to my questions about the bag of balls? Or do you expect to be the only speaker at this conference? What's the question. I didn't understand it.
swansont Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 13 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: That's just your opinion. 1. It's my opinion as well. "a theory with two suggestions for experimental verification" is a pretty decent summary of what our speculations section is all about 2. it's definitely off-topic for this thread (it's much more expansive than the application of Born's rule) 3. One has to question the wisdom of arguing with the people who enforce the rules.
Phi for All Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 11 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: That's just your opinion. If the suggested experiments work, we talk if it is or if it is not a theory. ! Moderator Note That's not going to work here. If you want to take other people's time to discuss science, it needs to be mainstream science, and if you introduce any speculations they need to be accepted by everyone, and yours are NOT. Further, you've been asked questions, and had misunderstandings pointed out that you aren't "dealing" with. Please go back through and correct the mistakes, negage with the other posters, and adjust your ideas accordingly, otherwise I'll have to shut the thread down.
Dimosthenis76 Posted March 25, 2019 Author Posted March 25, 2019 My email is irrelevant if someone wants to continue the discussion. Nice to meet you guys. Dimosthenis Michopoulos Physicist
Phi for All Posted March 25, 2019 Posted March 25, 2019 38 minutes ago, Dimosthenis76 said: Nice to meet you guys. ! Moderator Note Thread closed.
Recommended Posts