Irrational numbers or Irrational ideas?

[Rushzappa]

Can the basic logic of the universe computers work on produce an Irrational number?

Or is the idea that produces the irrational number itself irrational  like a belief?

Is a circle real in the universe? Did the Universe produce a perfect circle? 

Can ONE plank rotate? Smallest distance not divided by itself; a BIT or Quark of quantum fluctuation?

Just one by itself?. Where would it got if going forward one distance?

Can movememt reverse or just change direction?

Location needs Triangulation.

3 distance ∆ to return in the 1st repeatable pattern 3/1 or 180°/3 or 60° in one 

Constant C - 3 - circuit = location = resistance= distance= matter= atomic number.

Relative distance within a fixed Universe all in ONE time starting at the SiNGULARITY point where ALL matter NOW can be Triangulated back to. Common starting point - Lattitude, X surface.

A vortex UP polynomial hierarchy 3/1 makes new Z layer... 45° triangle 3X 1 4Y1 5Z  PI 

But GR is the tipping point 1  6X 1 8Y 10Z 

Numbers are protons are distance are locations at CPU cycle NOW.

Law of Original Horizontality all matter is laid flat and builds UP 90° with time.

So do GIS layers on our tracking devices.

6 is CARBON is surface is graphene is semiconductor is the layer all matter builds UP on

8 is Oxygen and is the LIFT OVER the Carbon surface; the angle 45° building up 3 3 9 9 24 rotations.

3D manifold until we end up in a double sided square pyramid rotating at the SiNGULARITY point with earth and the galaxies flattened in the square centre plane - the horizon 160/6 (8+8)*10)/6 Carbon.

Bubble in the centre of compression; Carbon Rod slowing down the Hydrogen reaction; stickiness - graphene; hardness from compression an inclusion in the centre of a  diamond?

Carbon life can stop in location by triangulating around a point - a circuit.

OHMS law CO2 a gear 868 - resistance COC basis for glucose 686 moves Carbon around.

16180 3399 GR

HCHO

3399

6 H2O CO2 COC gears of life and the stuff black holes spit up - cannot crush a octagon in X crossing forces - spins 

HEXAGON 6 STICKS

If at centre of earth you can go left or right and go out to the other side without going up.

But to get to the North Pole you MUST go UP from the centre.

Universe is compressed flat and life spreads out life water over the SiNGULARITY point X Lattitude that all physical matter now has a Cartesian coordinate location over- fact - truth - events that happen CONCURRENT - no two things same place at same time NOW.

So nature must take different speeds or paths to avoid friction - synchronization, timing, coordination by having a common goal of arriving CONCURRENT but NOT exactly the same place same time but beside each other.

Gears on bikes, an orchestra, hockey team  or organic cells, in synchronization good, not in synchronization - disintegration, friction,

Ethics of nature - defend location of self and home but cooperation and avoid collisions.

Biodiversity wouldn't happen if KILL for no reason were successful.

Neutral or Cooperative

Higher life cooperative and shares KNOWLEGE building TRUST.

Bees Starr honeycombs with a trIangle; communication on it.

Bees communicate locations accurately

Life finds its way home - location is basic fact; and at Time NOW has a unique coordinate within the Universe. Simple to complex layers; each movememt depends on last location;

Deductive logic step by step by to on point 

A point cannot be a line with no end

Triangulation is needed; 3/1 basic.

60° RIGHT rotation 

-1/3 +1/3° +1/3 quarks  leaving a -1/3 60° rotation or P out

(Mc2)2 +(PC2)2

3 squared ∆ 3*3 locations and P and the -X substitute so the total is squared again.

P is the ionization stream and we control it's Direction and record the feedback 

 

M is C is 3 Quarks + one P entropy -1/3 -60° 

 

 

 

 

Edited March 28, 2019 by Rushzappa
Spelling

[Strange]

54 minutes ago, Rushzappa said:

Can the basic logic of the universe computers work on produce an Irrational number?

Of course. Take a right-angle triangle with two sides equal to 1; the length of the hypotenuse is irrational.

55 minutes ago, Rushzappa said:

Or is the idea that produces the irrational number itself irrational  like a belief?

You are confusing two different words. The word "irrational" with reference to numbers means a number that cannot be expressed as a fraction. This is not really related to the concept of rational thought.

58 minutes ago, Rushzappa said:

Can ONE plank rotate?

A plank of wood?

The rest of your post is so incoherent it doesn't deserve an answer.

[wtf]

8 hours ago, Rushzappa said:

Or is the idea that produces the irrational number itself irrational  like a belief?

 

Irrational numbers can be the output of perfectly rational (in the sense of reasonable) processes. Suppose that by a rational process we mean a process that can be implemented as a computer program. There are computer programs that generate the digits of pi to arbitrary accuracy, or the square root of 2, or the base of natural logarithms e.

The real numbers whose digits can be cranked out by a computer program are called the computable numbers. What's interesting is that there are lots and lots of irrational numbers that can NOT be so computed. These are the non-computable numbers. They have no names, no uniquely characterizing properties. The noncomputable numbers are indeed worthy of being called irrational in both senses. They are crazy numbers in the sense that there is no rational process that generates their digits.. They are perfectly random.

 

Edited March 29, 2019 by wtf

[Sensei]

9 hours ago, Rushzappa said:

Is a circle real in the universe? Did the Universe produce a perfect circle? 

Universe is made of atoms. So circle line on e.g. paper in the real world, at high enough magnitude of zoom will reveal quantization of circle line to constituent atoms..

Computer monitor is good analogy and good example. Circle on screen is made of pixels. It's human eye which is not distinguishing single pixels.

8 hours ago, Strange said:

 

9 hours ago, Rushzappa said:

Can ONE plank rotate?

A plank of wood? 

I think he thought about Length of Planck.

 

8 hours ago, Strange said:

The rest of your post is so incoherent it doesn't deserve an answer.

Agree. The entire post is irrational...

 

Edited March 29, 2019 by Sensei