StringJunky Posted April 7, 2019 Posted April 7, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, ritastrakosha said: Michael Bailey, a renowned sexologist, has recently written an opinion article in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, titled "How to ruin sex research". He writes that sex research is being hampered by ideology and scientists should not bow to ideology. He urges for the controversial ideas in sex research not to be censored. Quote: If people knew which ideas had merit and which did not even before the ideas had been thoroughly discussed and tested, then we would not need science. What do you think? I have a feeling your ulterior motives and Bailey's are at odds, going by what you've posted in the past. He's talking about different issues which you appear to be erroneously aligning with yours. The difference between you and him is that you are a moral crusader and he's a scientist trying to unravel human sexuality against a background of social obstacles, like pro-LGBT activism, which is constantly on the defence because of historical stigmas. Edited April 7, 2019 by StringJunky
ritastrakosha Posted April 8, 2019 Posted April 8, 2019 18 hours ago, StringJunky said: I have a feeling your ulterior motives and Bailey's are at odds, going by what you've posted in the past. He's talking about different issues which you appear to be erroneously aligning with yours. The difference between you and him is that you are a moral crusader and he's a scientist trying to unravel human sexuality against a background of social obstacles, like pro-LGBT activism, which is constantly on the defence because of historical stigmas. Can you support the statement "you are a moral crusader" with facts? So as we are scientific here :-).
StringJunky Posted April 8, 2019 Author Posted April 8, 2019 27 minutes ago, ritastrakosha said: Can you support the statement "you are a moral crusader" with facts? So as we are scientific here :-). https://www.scienceforums.net/profile/128623-ritastrakosha/content/ You have an ongoing obsession with homosexual matters as those it's a pathology. 2
swansont Posted April 8, 2019 Posted April 8, 2019 ! Moderator Note That's not the topic of discussion for the original thread.
Recommended Posts