Jump to content

yet another


Sarahisme

Recommended Posts

This looks to be a generalisation of the complex roots of unity. Solving [math]z^n = 1[/math] will give you roots [math]z = e^{\frac{2\pi k}{n}}[/math] where [math]k \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}[/math] (this follows easily from de Moivre). The sum of these roots is fairly easy.

 

Hopefully this should be enough to get you started :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not know what your infinite sum is supposed to be. A complex number z can be written as z = a+bi = r*exp(it), r>=0 (radius), 0<=t<pi (angle), r and t being reals. Multiplication of two complex numbers in the latter representation then is z1 * z2 = r1*exp(it1) * r2*exp(it2) = r1*r2*exp(i(t1+t2)).

Therefore z^n = r^n * exp(int). And the n-th root of a complex number is all complex numbers z' = r' exp(it') for which r'^n = r (only one solution due to restrictions r'>=0, real) and exp(int')=exp(it) (n solutions due to periodicity of exp(ix) and restriction 0<=t'<2pi).

The angle-part is the one dave mentioned (|z|=1 <=> r=1).

EDIT: No, it isn´t. I didn´t read carefully enough. Dave mentioned z=1, not |z| = 1. You have to add a "t/n" summand to the phase in Dave´s solutions to go from z=1 to |z|=1. Nevertheless, the point is: Find n angles t' for which n*t' mod 2pi = t.

 

Sidenote: The sum of all n-th roots of a complex number must be equal to zero for n>1 due to symmetry arguments, anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have z = a^{1/n}, where 'a' is some complex number. What is the most general polar representation for any complex number ? Use this representation for 'a'. What do you get ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. There's a small mistake there. Why don't you write it out step by step ? And can you write it in the exponential form ?

 

2. Does z change, if I replace [imath]\theta[/imath] with [imath] \theta + 2 \pi m [/imath], where m is any integer ? So, in the most general case, the argument should contain the latter, rather than the former.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good so far. Any ideas on how to sum that series ? Does it look familiar ?

 

 

well i would start by seeing what it looks like when i expand it a bit.. but then hmmmm...not sure

 

p.s. don't worry i will get the latex thing happening in the next few days ;)

Picture 20.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand what post 17 is saying, but here's post #16 without the LaTeX :

 

"Isn't exp{i*theta /n} a constant number ?"

 

So can you not pull it out of the summation ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your first line : "Because ..." is incorrect. There is no reason for those things to be equal. This would mean that all the roots were the same and hence their sum would simply be n times the value of any one root. Also, it has no bearing on what follows.

 

Your last 2 lines are also incorrect. How are you left with a "1" in the sum after taking out exp(i*theta/n) ? What happened to all the terms ? I suggest you continue from the previous line, and procedd without skipping steps. Write each exponential term as a product of two terms - the constant exponential and the varying one. Then take the constant outside the sum .... etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.