Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

Petra Bonfert-Taylor gives a lovely example in the first lecture of her introductory complex analysis MOOC at Coursera on how the study of certain cubic equations led to an understanding of the necessity of extending the number system into the complex plane. She mentions 15th/16th Century mathematicians Tartaglia, Del Ferro and Cardano and then discusses Bombelli's Problem, the solutions of \(x^3\ =\ 15x\ + 4\).

Edited by Clear Kets
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 Here is my take on it:  If a and b are any numbers, then (a+ b)^3= a^3+ 3a^2b+ 3ab^2+ b^3.  And 3ab(a+ b)= 3a^2b+ 3ab^2.  Subtracting, (a+ b)^3- 3ab(a+ b)= a^3+ b^3.  

Let x= a+ b, m= 3ab, and n= a^3+ b^3.  That equation becomes the reduced cubic,  x^3+ mx= n ("reduced" because there is no x^2 term).   So given a and b, we can construct a cubic equation that has a+ b as a solution.  What about the other way?  Given m and n, can we determine a and b and so x?  

Of course we can!  From 3ab= m, b= m/3a.  Then a^3+ b^3= a^3+ (m/3a)^3= n.  Multiplying by a^3, (a^3)^2+ (m/3)^3= na^3.  That is a quadratic equation in a^3: (a^3)^2- n(a^3)+ (m/3)^3= 0.  Using the quadratic formula, a^3= (n+/- sqrt(n^2- 4(m/3)^3)/2.   We can write that in a little nicer form as a^3= (n/2)+/- sqrt((n/2)^2- (m/3)^3).  From a^3+ b^3= n, we have b^3= n- a^3= (n/2)-/+ sqrt((n/2)^2- (m/3)^3).  The various combinations of "+" or "-" give the three roots of the cubic equation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.