AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 Well I dont understand why people accept QFT since Relativity and QM are not "physically" connected? This shows how stupid Paul Dirac and all those who continued his work. -3
dimreepr Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: Well I dont understand why people accept QFT since Relativity and QM are not "physically" connected? This shows how stupid Paul Dirac and all those who continued his work. Thank you and thanks for all the fish...
Phi for All Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: This shows how stupid Paul Dirac and all those who continued his work. ! Moderator Note We don't attack people here. Stick to attacking ideas you don't understand, and at least you won't be breaking the rules.
Bufofrog Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 (edited) 17 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: Well I dont understand why people accept QFT Probably because it works, you know like computers and stuff... Shouldn't this these be in the trash, or at the very least pseudoscience? Edited July 19, 2019 by Bufofrog
John Cuthber Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 15 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: This shows how stupid Paul Dirac and all those who continued his work. LOL If, in spite of the rules, you are going to call people stupid, at least get the grammar right. 16 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: Well I dont understand... A lot of things, including the use of apostrophes.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 16 minutes ago, Phi for All said: ! Moderator Note We don't attack people here. Stick to attacking ideas you don't understand, and at least you won't be breaking the rules. Attack dead mans?Dirac,Feynmann... 4 minutes ago, Bufofrog said: Probably because it works, you know like computers and stuff... Shouldn't this these be in the trash, or at the very least pseudoscience? Tell me how it works... 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: Attack dead mans?Dirac,Feynmann... Tell me how it works... The basic idea is wrong , you cant combine QM with relativity , something which predicts the outcome with something real. 6 minutes ago, Bufofrog said: Probably because it works, you know like computers and stuff... Shouldn't this these be in the trash, or at the very least pseudoscience? something not real with something real....
Strange Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: The basic idea is wrong , you cant combine QM with relativity , something which predicts the outcome with something real. ! Moderator Note Your incredulity is not a valid argument. Unless you can show an error in the mathematics this thread will be closed.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 20 minutes ago, dimreepr said: Thank you and thanks for all the fish... QM gives us possible outcomes about the subatomic particle's properties . In Relativity however the object has distinguished properties. 1 minute ago, Strange said: ! Moderator Note Your incredulity is not a valid argument. Unless you can show an error in the mathematics this thread will be closed. No wrong in mathematics . Wrong in combining those 2 concepts which are unfamiliar with each other.
Bufofrog Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: Tell me how it works... Why, you can't even understand what science is after it was explained to you multiple times!! I think you are just pretending to be this stupid and this is just fun trolling for you. Reported as such.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Strange said: ! Moderator Note Your incredulity is not a valid argument. Unless you can show an error in the mathematics this thread will be closed. Relativity is applied to real objects with distinguished properties . Quantum mechanics gives us a prediction of the outcome of a subatomic particle's properties . They are not "physically" connected.
swansont Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 6 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: Tell me how it works... I thought you knew all physics?
dimreepr Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: QM gives us possible outcomes about the subatomic particle's properties . In Relativity however the object has distinguished properties. You don't understand QM and relative to me ( a very low bar) you don't understand that either.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 Just now, swansont said: I thought you knew all physics? I know what QFT says . I just don;t believe it.
swansont Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: Relativity is applied to real objects with distinguished properties . Quantum mechanics gives us a prediction of the outcome of a subatomic particle's properties . They are not "physically" connected. Why is this a requirement? Just now, AUDI R6 said: I know what QFT says . I just don;t believe it. Asserted without evidence.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 Just now, dimreepr said: You don't understand QM and relative to me ( a very low bar) you don't understand that either. Yes of course whatever you say. Just now, swansont said: Why is this a requirement? Asserted without evidence. 2 theories must be "physically " connected. They must describe the same situation to be combined .
dimreepr Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 Just now, AUDI R6 said: Yes of course whatever you say. Wow, relatively, you nearly got that right.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: Yes of course whatever you say. 2 theories must be "physically " connected. They must describe the same situation to be combined . You cant combine QM with Relativity because they describe two different situations . First describes quantum uncertainty of the properties of a subatomic particle , second describes how time and space are relative to the speed of the observer for real objects . QM gives possible outcome so imaginary objects as well. 1 minute ago, dimreepr said: Wow, relatively, you nearly got that right. Dont you understand sarcasm?
swansont Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: 2 theories must be "physically " connected. Asserted without evidence. 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: They must describe the same situation to be combined . Can I combine electrostatics with mechanics? Coulomb's law says nothing about the motion of an object, yet I think I can describe the classical motion of a charged particle in proximity to another charged particle. Just now, AUDI R6 said: You cant combine QM with Relativity because they describe two different situations . First describes quantum uncertainty of the properties of a subatomic particle , second describes how time and space are relative to the speed of the observer for real objects . QM gives possible outcome so imaginary objects as well. I thought you knew all of physics.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, swansont said: Asserted without evidence. Can I combine electrostatics with mechanics? Coulomb's law says nothing about the motion of an object, yet I think I can describe the classical motion of a charged particle in proximity to another charged particle. I thought you knew all of physics. But both electrostatics and mechanics , the object we measure has the same properties ..... Just now, AUDI R6 said: But both electrostatics and mechanics , the object we measure has the same properties ..... And both theories describe something real . Unlike QM which doesnt describe only real things but imaginary too.
dimreepr Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: Dont you understand sarcasm? Do you? I'm going to stop now or I'll get a ticking off.
swansont Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 1 minute ago, AUDI R6 said: But both electrostatics and mechanics , the object we measure has the same properties ..... And both theories describe something real . Unlike QM which doesnt describe only real things but imaginary too. I can't even...
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 Just now, swansont said: I can't even... Mathematically QFT is correct , but physically it isnt
swansont Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 Just now, AUDI R6 said: Mathematically QFT is correct , but physically it isnt I refer you to the response I gave some moments ago.
AUDI R6 Posted July 19, 2019 Author Posted July 19, 2019 Just now, swansont said: I refer you to the response I gave some moments ago. You cant even what?
dimreepr Posted July 19, 2019 Posted July 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, AUDI R6 said: You cant even what? I'm guessing he can't even believe he got suckered into a sensible reply.
Recommended Posts