New Quantum Dimensional Geometry reforms Physics dogma

[Lawrence Dawson]

Quantum four-dimensional geometry has taken 10 years to develop mathematically and to apply to atomic physics. It is based upon data such as the Rydberg quantum formula for the light spectrum of hydrogen, which became the model for the shell/subshell system of orbitales used in the Periodic Table of Elements. Quantum-Dimensional Mathematics have also provided a much more precise model of the nucleus, one which is likely to be rejected out of hand because it is so foreign to current thoughts. However, the nuclear model should be considered because it identifies a bonding function for neutrons which is completely lacking in current confused understandings. The model proposes that heat is conducted by the electron bonds and stored and output as thermal radiation from the nucleus. This contrasts with the current theory that heat is conducted by molecular bonds and stored by the agitation of nuclei within the molecule. The model is confirmed by the non-understood factor "e" in the Stefan-Boltzmann equation as well as a study by MIT which showed that an electrically pumped LED could show greater power output then electrical power input. The needed energy for over unity was provided by certain temperatures but not others. The quantum-dimensional model of the nucleus accurately predicted what temperature would provide over unity and why.

The nuclear model can also challenge the CO2 as a greenhouse gas presumption.Carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas is central to those who believe in catastrophic, human-caused climate change. The premise that CO2 operates as a greenhouse is built upon the measurement of carbon dioxide gas as having blackbody characteristics. That is, carbon dioxide can absorb radiation and radiate it back as thermal radiation. It is argued that the 400 PPM CO2 in the atmosphere absorbs thermal radiation from the earth, radiating it back and, thus preventing the earth’s cooling by restricting thermal radiation escaping into space. The increase in man-caused CO2 levels is said to increase the amount of retained earth temperature to catastrophic levels.This greenhouse gas model, however, Is plagued by an incorrect model of the way that atoms absorb and radiate back heat. The quantum-dimensional model shows that the infrared wavelengths of thermal radiation retain a great proportion of the heat in the nucleus. CO2 may not radiate much of the captured heat back to earth.

Perhaps a debate upon consensus climate change might be the best way to introduce quantum-dimensional mathematics and physics.

PS I am not a climate-change denier

[Dagl1]

While I am not a physicist or anything, but... isn't black body radiation and the amount of radiation from CO2 measured and confirmed? I have never heard that these measurements go against the expected amount according to current models. 

Also could you provide references for well. The things you are stating;p?

-Dagl

[koti]

Four dimensional spacetime geometry is what General Relativity models, what do you mean by „quantum dimensional geometry” and „quantum dimensional mathematics/physics” and what does climate change have to do with all this? This and the rest of the post seems like concept salad.

Edited July 22, 2019 by koti

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

I see a lot of claims and zero evidence to back them up. No links to papers, no model. That needs to change with the very next post, or this will be closed.

 

[Strange]

8 hours ago, Lawrence Dawson said:

The premise that CO2 operates as a greenhouse is built upon the measurement of carbon dioxide gas as having blackbody characteristics.

This not true (the black body bit). 

However, as you say, the absorption/emission properties are measured so even if you had a different underlying model for that, it would not change its measured behaviour as a greenhouse gas. 

[Edit] I am pretty sure that when the first calculations were made which showed that CO2 could be a greenhouse gas (and industrialisation could cause this) there was no model of how the spectra arose. So changing the model, can't change the consequences.

 

However, as you apparently don’t know what frequencies CO2 absorbs/radiates, it seems implausible that you can model them. 

8 hours ago, Lawrence Dawson said:

CO2 may not radiate much of the captured heat back to earth.

As you say, this has been measured

8 hours ago, Lawrence Dawson said:

PS I am not a climate-change denier

Then why are you denying it!?

[Bufofrog]

Physics dogma?  Great start, Larry.

[Phi for All]

8 hours ago, Lawrence Dawson said:

Quantum four-dimensional geometry has taken 10 years to develop mathematically and to apply to atomic physics.

Yet you present none of it here?! In my experience, mathematicians don't pass up an opportunity to speak in their favorite language. This looks like a bit of flim-flam, trying to hustle us past the problems so we don't see them. Without the maths, you have no model.

[Lawrence Dawson]

One at a time.  To Phi for All:."Hustle us past the problems so we don't see them. Without the maths, you have no model."

I have written five books  on the topic. Quantum Dimensional Mathematics are rather complex for introduction in a forum Post. The most in-depth treatment of quantum-dimensional physics is in the book "Four Dimensional Atomic Structure." The best intro to quantum-dimensional mathematics is the booklet "The Quantum Dimensional Review of Einstein vs. Newton." Both may be reviewed on Amazon.

To Strange: "However, as you say, the absorption/emission properties are measured so even if you had a different underlying model for that, it would not change its measured behaviour as a greenhouse gas." 

the amount of CO2 absorption was not measured. Only the return thermal radiation was measured. Return thermal radiation is a curve established by temperature and which must be integrated to determine total amounts of thermal radiation Power. This is established by the Stefan Boltzmann Law (Google it) which reduces the integral to a constant (Stefan Boltzmann Constant) times a function of temperature and another variable called "emissivity."  Emissivity is a factor between zero and one, meaning the Stefan Boltzmann determination of total Power output by thermal radiation at a specific temperature must be reduced by a percentage. Although "emissivity" has been proposed to be a function of the radiating material, it was first measured as a function of temperature. It is explained by the quantum-dimensional model of the nucleus and its capacity to output thermal radiation .See "Four Dimensional Atomic Structure.."

 

 

[swansont]

18 minutes ago, Lawrence Dawson said:

One at a time.

!

Moderator Note

However, I was first.