Is This Correct About Gravity, The Hubble Shift, Galactic Rotation Velocities and the Origins of Spacetime?

[Strange]

4 hours ago, captcass said:

Again, no one KNOWS anything, hence DM and DE, "Dark" meaning "I don't know".

We know a lot about dark matter. The fact that we have not directly detected it is not the same as not knowing anything.

4 hours ago, captcass said:

There is no citation needed about Einstein giving up on his constant.

Ah. I had no idea what you were talking about. I thought he had given up on a jigsaw puzzle, or something.

Yes, he realised it was wrong to assume the universe was static. 

It was re-introduced later when it was thought that there were stars older than the age of the universe. 

It was then used again when accelerating expansion was discovered.

4 hours ago, captcass said:

It became impossible if Hubble's shift is a Doppler effect, which they all (and most still do) believed.

It is not a Doppler shift. I don't think anyone has ever thought that. The very first calculation of the effect (before Hubble) was based on GR and a small number of red-shift measurements. (There is a proposal to rename it the Hubble-Lemaitre Law because of this.)

 

[swansont]

4 hours ago, captcass said:

It is not an acceleration through time. It is an acceleration in the rate of proper time.

Thank you for correcting this in a way that is completely unhelpful in answering the question or clarifying what's going on.

4 hours ago, captcass said:

Quantum physics has superceeded Newtonian physics which describes how mass and gravity appear to relate, but never actually describes what gravity is.

Quantum physics says zip about gravity. Quantum physics has proven to be the best model for situations where the scale is small (typically though not exclusively small distances, small masses) Relativity superseded Newtonian physics when it comes to gravity, and GR and QM don't get along when at scales where it matters.

 

[captcass]

Sorry you are having trouble picturing what I am saying. I can't help that. I suggest you read and then re-read the paper until you understand the concepts and points of view. If you then want to discuss them, that is fine with me. If not, I don't really care. But I'm not going to play the game you are playing arguing points of view. I have better things to do with my time.

Others are seeing this very clearly. I expect most bangers to have a hard time with it. I am sorry for that, but that is just the way it is when we have been on the wrong path for so long. It is hard to change our perspective. It was hard for ME to change my perspective.

People are also heavily invested in the mainstream theories in many different ways......lots of egos, jobs, careers and money involved, which makes it particularly difficult.

However, my theory is logical and doesn't violate any known laws or principles. The mainstream theories you folks all cling to are based on totally illogical premises. And you can explain NONE OF IT. Do you really think the universe can be soooooo illogical.......??

 

 

 

[Mordred]

I have looked at your paper, you still haven't addressed my question on your fundamental metric.

I already showed that you aren't able to account for galaxy rotation as you were not able to produce a graph or dataset for comparison.

 I also showed other pieces of evidence in terms of expansion that you simply claim without examination as being wrong. Even though temperature studies directly relate to expansion rates lmao. There is nothing quantum about the laws of thermodynamics...

In essence your not doing a very good job in defending your paper. You should have the answers ready for these types of questions.

 

Edited August 2, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

Sorry, Mordred. I am not going to try to re-explain the paper here. I am sorry if you do not understand the metrics, etc., that others are seeing clearly....

[Mordred]

You won't even identify your supposed tensors how lame. You cannot simply place the coordinates in a diagonal line with a tensor. Those are not Einstein's metric tensors.

Here is the thing I expected that type of response. I knew you couldn't back them up.

Edited August 2, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

Sorry, you will find the Fundamental Metric in Einstein's 1915 paper. I thought you knew that.

[Mordred]

I read his 1915 paper I don't recall him using his tensors in that fashion. For that matter in 1915 I don't believe he used tensors at that time.

Edited August 2, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

We must be talking about different papers. He lays out GR in the paper and begins with the Fundamental Metric. "Einstein, Albert, Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Annalen der Physik 354 (7), 769-822"  ( "The Foundation of the Generalized Theory of Relativity" - for you English speakers.

It is the basis of the tensors describing a null gravitational field.

[Mordred]

You might want to look again how he handled his tensor. He certainly did not place coordinates along the diagonal.

He placed the covariant and contravariant vector components in those locations.

Hence his need for the Einstein summation rules to track the covariant or contravariant tensor. The vector components are for the four momentum and four velocity components in zero and one form. (Scalar, vector components) that is the unknowns a tensor tracks.

 

Edited August 2, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

You are correct. As he develops his tensors describing gravity he does that. He never develops the tensors for the Fundamental Metric as he believes it probably an impossible metric in finite space, i.e., there is always gravity. I use it as a basis, though, like Einstein, I believe it is an impossible metric since spacetime is always energetic. I use it as the basis because it simply states how time evolves space forward in the fundamental way and direction, i.e., in the forward direction of time....

[Mordred]

Then your misusing the purpose of a tensor. The fundamental tensor doesn't specify a coordinate choice. If you used them correctly in the manner Einstein did you would find it far more useful.

That was why I couldn't identify those objects they weren't employed correctly.

Should be more on line with this though it's just for illustration purposes.

[latex]\frac{dx^\alpha}{dy^{\mu}}=\frac{dx^\beta}{dy^{\nu}}=\begin{pmatrix}\frac{dx^0}{dy^0}&\frac{dx^1}{dy^0}&\frac{dx^2}{dy^0}&\frac{dx^3}{dy^0}\\\frac{dx^0}{dy^1}&\frac{dx^1}{dy^1}&\frac{dx^2}{dy^1}&\frac{dx^3}{dy^1}\\\frac{dx^0}{dy^2}&\frac{dx^1}{dy^2}&\frac{dx^2}{dy^2}&\frac{dx^3}{dy^2}\\\frac{dx^0}{dy^3}&\frac{dx^1}{dy^3}&\frac{dx^2}{dy^3}&\frac{dx^3}{dy^3}\end{pmatrix}[/latex]

Edited August 2, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

I am not forming tensors. Neither am I working within GR. I have no argument with GR where it works. So I m not misusing it. There is no coordinate choice needed as there are no tensors. It It represents a single, massless, point of view in a massless universe. No other coordinates to relate motion or velocity to..... I call this the IATIA point of view, "I Am That I Am" (And I Am Alone).

 

[Mordred]

Well this is the sort of things you will get questioned on. Ordinarily I for one would have looked at that paper. Saw the tensors and lost any faith in the paper as a result. Thus discarding it as invalid.

 Regardless of anything else the paper described. (I have read tons of alternative model papers,) it is a habit I developed as a result.

[captcass]

Again, there are no tensors, only metrics.......

In the last section I originate spacetime with the IATIA state, though it is termed the universal cosmic consciousness to avoid "religious" implications. This is not something new. Einstein and Newton both had somewhat similar, panthietic views on this. That info is referenced in the paper.

Spacetime is the result of that awareness of being "here", "now".

This solves the problem of non-locality. As we are all just different points of view for that single cosmic awareness, all points of view must be harmonized regardless of the distance between them, and they can be because we are just diferent points of view for one overall awareness.

[Mordred]

Obviously it's not as clear as you might like to think. Anyways enough said on that issue.  The main issues I have mentioned already. It's up to you what you do with those details. Makes no difference to me.

I will stick to the predictive power of LCDM

[latex]{\small\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline T_{Ho} (Gy) & T_{H\infty} (Gy) & S_{eq} & H_{0} & \Omega_\Lambda & \Omega_m\\ \hline 14.4&17.3&3400&67.9&0.693&0.307\\ \hline \end{array}}[/latex] [latex]{\small\begin{array}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline a=1/S&S&z&T (Gy)&R (Gly)&D_{now} (Gly)&D_{then}(Gly)&D_{hor}(Gly)&D_{par}(Gly)&V_{gen}/c&V_{now}/c&V_{then}/c&H/Ho \\ \hline 0.000&20000.000&19999.000&0.000002&0.000004&46.176564&0.002309&0.003133&0.000004&205.563&3.207&659.180&4111262.687\\ \hline 0.000&17289.385&17288.385&0.000002&0.000005&46.165643&0.002670&0.003624&0.000006&179.716&3.206&576.161&3107182.561\\ \hline 0.000&14946.142&14945.142&0.000003&0.000006&46.153161&0.003088&0.004191&0.000007&157.348&3.205&504.314&2351750.032\\ \hline 0.000&12920.481&12919.481&0.000004&0.000008&46.138916&0.003571&0.004847&0.000010&137.985&3.204&442.117&1782835.135\\ \hline 0.000&11169.359&11168.359&0.000006&0.000011&46.122686&0.004129&0.005605&0.000013&121.217&3.203&388.253&1353913.715\\ \hline 0.000&9655.567&9654.567&0.000007&0.000014&46.104229&0.004775&0.006482&0.000017&106.688&3.202&341.582&1030136.639\\ \hline 0.000&8346.941&8345.941&0.000010&0.000018&46.083280&0.005521&0.007496&0.000022&94.093&3.200&301.120&785390.548\\ \hline 0.000&7215.674&7214.674&0.000013&0.000024&46.059553&0.006383&0.008668&0.000028&83.166&3.199&266.014&600099.813\\ \hline 0.000&6237.728&6236.728&0.000017&0.000031&46.032740&0.007380&0.010023&0.000037&73.678&3.197&235.527&459582.602\\ \hline 0.000&5392.325&5391.325&0.000022&0.000041&46.002511&0.008531&0.011589&0.000049&65.430&3.195&209.025&352821.232\\ \hline 0.000&4661.499&4660.499&0.000029&0.000053&45.968515&0.009861&0.013398&0.000063&58.252&3.192&185.956&271542.271\\ \hline 0.000&4029.723&4028.723&0.000038&0.000069&45.930379&0.011398&0.015489&0.000083&51.996&3.190&165.846&209528.248\\ \hline 0.000&3483.571&3482.571&0.000049&0.000089&45.887713&0.013173&0.017905&0.000108&46.533&3.187&148.286&162102.591\\ \hline 0.000&3011.440&3010.440&0.000064&0.000115&45.840102&0.015222&0.020697&0.000141&41.755&3.183&132.922&125744.099\\ \hline 0.000&2603.298&2602.298&0.000083&0.000147&45.787114&0.017588&0.023921&0.000183&37.567&3.180&119.451&97798.341\\ \hline 0.000&2250.471&2249.471&0.000107&0.000189&45.728297&0.020319&0.027645&0.000238&33.887&3.176&107.611&76261.538\\ \hline 0.001&1945.463&1944.463&0.000138&0.000242&45.663177&0.023472&0.031946&0.000309&30.645&3.171&97.177&59618.702\\ \hline 0.001&1681.793&1680.793&0.000178&0.000308&45.591258&0.027109&0.036912&0.000400&27.781&3.166&87.957&46722.371\\ \hline 0.001&1453.858&1452.858&0.000229&0.000392&45.512021&0.031304&0.042644&0.000517&25.244&3.161&79.786&36701.715\\ \hline 0.001&1256.816&1255.816&0.000293&0.000498&45.424920&0.036143&0.049261&0.000668&22.990&3.155&72.523&28894.398\\ \hline 0.001&1086.479&1085.479&0.000375&0.000632&45.329382&0.041721&0.056896&0.000860&20.981&3.148&66.046&22795.447\\ \hline 0.001&939.227&938.227&0.000479&0.000799&45.224799&0.048151&0.065705&0.001107&19.185&3.141&60.252&18018.870\\ \hline 0.001&811.933&810.933&0.000610&0.001009&45.110530&0.055559&0.075865&0.001421&17.574&3.133&55.053&14268.819\\ \hline 0.001&701.891&700.891&0.000776&0.001272&44.985893&0.064092&0.087582&0.001821&16.125&3.124&50.374&11317.881\\ \hline 0.002&606.763&605.763&0.000984&0.001602&44.850151&0.073917&0.101089&0.002331&14.817&3.115&46.150&8990.691\\ \hline 0.002&524.528&523.528&0.001246&0.002013&44.702547&0.085224&0.116656&0.002977&13.635&3.104&42.327&7151.803\\ \hline 0.002&453.439&452.439&0.001576&0.002528&44.542240&0.098232&0.134592&0.003798&12.562&3.093&38.856&5696.020\\ \hline 0.003&391.984&390.984&0.001989&0.003171&44.368340&0.113189&0.155250&0.004837&11.586&3.081&35.698&4541.568\\ \hline 0.003&338.858&337.858&0.002507&0.003973&44.179892&0.130379&0.179033&0.006151&10.697&3.068&32.818&3624.660\\ \hline 0.003&292.932&291.932&0.003156&0.004973&43.975866&0.150123&0.206406&0.007812&9.884&3.054&30.185&2895.401\\ \hline 0.004&253.231&252.231&0.003967&0.006221&43.755157&0.172788&0.237894&0.009908&9.140&3.039&27.774&2314.657\\ \hline 0.005&218.910&217.910&0.004983&0.007777&43.516576&0.198787&0.274101&0.012552&8.459&3.022&25.562&1851.663\\ \hline 0.005&189.241&188.241&0.006251&0.009715&43.258839&0.228591&0.315712&0.015881&7.832&3.004&23.529&1482.174\\ \hline 0.006&163.593&162.593&0.007836&0.012131&42.980568&0.262728&0.363509&0.020072&7.256&2.985&21.658&1187.044\\ \hline 0.007&141.421&140.421&0.009814&0.015140&42.680274&0.301795&0.418376&0.025342&6.725&2.964&19.934&951.123\\ \hline 0.008&122.254&121.254&0.012281&0.018888&42.356356&0.346461&0.481319&0.031965&6.236&2.941&18.343&762.400\\ \hline 0.009&105.685&104.685&0.015360&0.023555&42.007089&0.397474&0.553475&0.040281&5.785&2.917&16.874&611.341\\ \hline 0.011&91.362&90.362&0.019198&0.029366&41.630613&0.455669&0.636127&0.050717&5.367&2.891&15.517&490.365\\ \hline 0.013&78.979&77.979&0.023982&0.036601&41.224927&0.521971&0.730722&0.063805&4.981&2.863&14.261&393.435\\ \hline 0.015&68.275&67.275&0.029945&0.045607&40.787876&0.597404&0.838883&0.080210&4.625&2.832&13.099&315.740\\ \hline 0.017&59.022&58.022&0.037374&0.056818&40.317137&0.683089&0.962426&0.100761&4.294&2.800&12.022&253.440\\ \hline 0.020&51.023&50.023&0.046628&0.070773&39.810212&0.780248&1.103379&0.126494&3.988&2.765&11.025&203.469\\ \hline 0.023&44.107&43.107&0.058154&0.088140&39.264409&0.890200&1.263992&0.158700&3.704&2.727&10.100&163.376\\ \hline 0.026&38.129&37.129&0.072507&0.109755&38.676834&1.014355&1.446749&0.198990&3.441&2.686&9.242&131.202\\ \hline 0.030&32.962&31.962&0.090379&0.136654&38.044371&1.154197&1.654382&0.249376&3.197&2.642&8.446&105.376\\ \hline 0.035&28.494&27.494&0.112630&0.170126&37.363667&1.311262&1.889865&0.312362&2.971&2.595&7.708&84.643\\ \hline 0.041&24.633&23.633&0.140330&0.211778&36.631117&1.487101&2.156417&0.391072&2.760&2.544&7.022&67.996\\ \hline 0.047&21.294&20.294&0.174810&0.263603&35.842847&1.683229&2.457480&0.489403&2.565&2.489&6.385&54.628\\ \hline 0.054&18.408&17.408&0.217725&0.328081&34.994692&1.901049&2.796687&0.612206&2.384&2.430&5.794&43.892\\ \hline 0.063&15.913&14.913&0.271135&0.408293&34.082186&2.141751&3.177806&0.765530&2.216&2.367&5.246&35.269\\ \hline 0.073&13.756&12.756&0.337600&0.508064&33.100541&2.406175&3.604661&0.956907&2.060&2.299&4.736&28.343\\ \hline 0.084&11.892&10.892&0.420302&0.632135&32.044639&2.694622&4.081006&1.195721&1.916&2.225&4.263&22.780\\ \hline 0.097&10.280&9.280&0.523190&0.786374&30.909028&3.006618&4.610359&1.493649&1.781&2.146&3.823&18.312\\ \hline 0.113&8.887&7.887&0.651169&0.978020&29.687930&3.340591&5.195764&1.865225&1.657&2.062&3.416&14.724\\ \hline 0.130&7.683&6.683&0.810311&1.215961&28.375279&3.693465&5.839491&2.328514&1.541&1.971&3.037&11.842\\ \hline 0.151&6.641&5.641&1.008122&1.511033&26.964796&4.060144&6.542622&2.905956&1.435&1.873&2.687&9.530\\ \hline 0.174&5.741&4.741&1.253846&1.876293&25.450129&4.432867&7.304545&3.625372&1.337&1.767&2.363&7.675\\ \hline 0.201&4.963&3.963&1.558799&2.327179&23.825108&4.800429&8.122326&4.521173&1.247&1.655&2.063&6.188\\ \hline 0.233&4.290&3.290&1.936716&2.881408&22.084174&5.147268&8.989970&5.635767&1.165&1.534&1.786&4.998\\ \hline 0.270&3.709&2.709&2.404043&3.558280&20.223075&5.452469&9.897627&7.021120&1.091&1.404&1.532&4.047\\ \hline 0.312&3.206&2.206&2.980053&4.376931&18.239956&5.688795&10.830860&8.740393&1.026&1.267&1.300&3.290\\ \hline 0.361&2.772&1.772&3.686596&5.352847&16.136965&5.821954&11.770188&10.869429&0.971&1.121&1.088&2.690\\ \hline 0.417&2.396&1.396&4.547172&6.492006&13.922435&5.810487&12.691280&13.497756&0.926&0.967&0.895&2.218\\ \hline 0.483&2.071&1.071&5.584972&7.782713&11.613472&5.606733&13.566290&16.728640&0.893&0.806&0.720&1.850\\ \hline 0.558&1.791&0.791&6.819766&9.187222&9.238127&5.159198&14.366647&20.677895&0.875&0.642&0.562&1.567\\ \hline 0.646&1.548&0.548&8.263398&10.638174&6.836876&4.416787&15.067772&25.471023&0.874&0.475&0.415&1.354\\ \hline 0.747&1.338&0.338&9.916385&12.046512&4.459391&3.332534&15.653372&31.241059&0.893&0.310&0.277&1.195\\ \hline 0.864&1.157&0.157&11.765822&13.322302&2.159206&1.866567&16.119055&38.127444&0.934&0.150&0.140&1.081\\ \hline 1.000&1.000&0.000&13.787206&14.399932&0.000000&0.000000&16.472274&46.278944&1.000&0.000&0.000&1.000\\ \hline 1.157&0.864&-0.136&15.949257&15.253049&2.025259&2.342778&16.729017&55.860281&1.092&0.141&0.154&0.944\\ \hline 1.330&0.752&-0.248&18.119937&15.868602&3.776034&5.021225&16.902532&66.541642&1.207&0.262&0.316&0.907\\ \hline 1.529&0.654&-0.346&20.364351&16.316986&5.351007&8.179614&17.022584&78.899686&1.349&0.372&0.501&0.883\\ \hline 1.757&0.569&-0.431&22.661663&16.633777&6.753533&11.867295&17.103595&93.162722&1.521&0.469&0.713&0.866\\ \hline 2.020&0.495&-0.505&24.995938&16.852681&7.993330&16.146258&17.156887&109.598461&1.726&0.555&0.958&0.854\\ \hline 2.322&0.431&-0.569&27.355554&17.001597&9.083612&21.092407&17.190833&128.519287&1.967&0.631&1.241&0.847\\ \hline 2.669&0.375&-0.625&29.732316&17.101816&10.038989&26.796679&17.211369&150.287986&2.248&0.697&1.567&0.842\\ \hline 3.068&0.326&-0.674&32.120574&17.168771&10.874126&33.366354&17.222580&175.324334&2.574&0.755&1.943&0.839\\ \hline 3.527&0.284&-0.716&34.516493&17.213286&11.602965&40.926708&17.227206&204.112836&2.951&0.806&2.378&0.837\\ \hline 4.055&0.247&-0.753&36.917669&17.242614&12.238388&49.623281&17.242614&237.211976&3.386&0.850&2.878&0.835\\ \hline 4.661&0.215&-0.785&39.322038&17.262122&12.791888&59.623757&17.262122&275.264135&3.888&0.888&3.454&0.834\\ \hline 5.358&0.187&-0.813&41.728630&17.275006&13.273834&71.122086&17.275006&319.008947&4.466&0.922&4.117&0.834\\ \hline 6.159&0.162&-0.838&44.136688&17.283510&13.693343&84.341439&17.283510&369.296866&5.132&0.951&4.880&0.833\\ \hline 7.080&0.141&-0.859&46.545713&17.289121&14.058427&99.538637&17.289121&427.105797&5.897&0.976&5.757&0.833\\ \hline 8.139&0.123&-0.877&48.955376&17.292823&14.376104&117.009086&17.292823&493.560063&6.778&0.998&6.766&0.833\\ \hline 9.356&0.107&-0.893&51.365458&17.295268&14.652505&137.092490&17.295268&569.952239&7.790&1.018&7.927&0.833\\ \hline 10.755&0.093&-0.907&53.775817&17.296884&14.892977&160.179433&17.296884&657.768267&8.954&1.034&9.261&0.833\\ \hline 12.364&0.081&-0.919&56.186358&17.297955&15.102184&186.718955&17.297955&758.716349&10.292&1.049&10.794&0.832\\ \hline 14.213&0.070&-0.930&58.597192&17.298492&15.284198&217.227456&17.298492&874.760335&11.831&1.061&12.558&0.832\\ \hline 16.338&0.061&-0.939&61.007932&17.298966&15.442527&252.298033&17.298966&1008.157223&13.600&1.072&14.585&0.832\\ \hline 18.781&0.053&-0.947&63.418723&17.299285&15.580263&292.613061&17.299285&1161.502106&15.633&1.082&16.915&0.832\\ \hline 21.589&0.046&-0.954&65.829549&17.299500&15.700084&338.956767&17.299500&1337.777952&17.971&1.090&19.593&0.832\\ \hline 24.818&0.040&-0.960&68.240398&17.299648&15.804318&392.230657&17.299648&1540.413806&20.658&1.098&22.673&0.832\\ \hline 28.529&0.035&-0.965&70.651261&17.299752&15.894994&453.471049&17.299752&1773.351488&23.747&1.104&26.213&0.832\\ \hline 32.795&0.030&-0.970&73.062134&17.299826&15.973875&523.869234&17.299826&2041.122274&27.298&1.109&30.282&0.832\\ \hline 37.700&0.027&-0.973&75.473014&17.299881&16.042495&604.794651&17.299881&2348.935043&31.380&1.114&34.959&0.832\\ \hline 43.337&0.023&-0.977&77.883897&17.299923&16.102188&697.821519&17.299923&2702.777600&36.073&1.118&40.337&0.832\\ \hline 49.818&0.020&-0.980&80.294784&17.299957&16.154117&804.759467&17.299957&3109.533156&41.467&1.122&46.518&0.832\\ \hline 57.267&0.017&-0.983&82.705845&17.299812&16.199293&927.688905&17.299812&3577.114400&47.668&1.125&53.624&0.832\\ \hline 65.831&0.015&-0.985&85.116734&17.299837&16.238589&1069.000801&17.299837&4114.616727&54.796&1.128&61.793&0.832\\ \hline 75.675&0.013&-0.987&87.527625&17.299860&16.272774&1231.444233&17.299860&4732.496211&62.990&1.130&71.182&0.832\\ \hline 86.991&0.011&-0.989&89.938516&17.299880&16.302512&1418.179173&17.299880&5442.772310&72.410&1.132&81.976&0.832\\ \hline 100.000&0.010&-0.990&92.349407&17.299900&16.328381&1632.838131&17.299900&6259.261851&83.237&1.134&94.384&0.832\\ \hline \end{array}}[/latex]

 

Edited August 2, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

LOL. OK......

Bang Away!

[Mordred]

 I will and trust  in one detail, I have banged away that am confident to myself in my overall understanding of any mainstream physics topic. Currently I have figured out CKM mixing angles with regards  to electroweak  symmetry breaks within the SM model.

 I can correlate those mixing angles into such details into DE and am currently looking into applications with regards to DM. However the mathematics are far beyond  anything that is readily described  via a forum. I may be good at describing the complex in laymen terms but not that  good.

Please note I did describe numerous over sites in your article  which you did not fully address except through a hand waving fashion. I recognized from my first reading  that you were not following any Einstein methodology in your seemingly tensors that you falsified by the claimed as Einstein fundamental metric. 

 After confrontation you eventually admitted they were your own creation. Which you do not mention in your article. You made numerous claims you have not shown any adequacy in defending. 

So absolutely nothing I have seen in this thread nor your article has convicted me that my studies into mainstream physics in Cosmology applications is in error.

(That list includes the Hubble Illusion thread ) in which I pointed out several of the issues in this thread. (Lol I even provided the redshift corrections beyond Hubble horizon for you) which you ignored.

[captcass]

I did nothing of the sort. You just don't grasp the concept or what his metric represents. Anyway. I won't be responding to you anymore. I don't appreciate being accused of falsification.

Good luck with your DE.... Be sure to let me know when it is peer reviewed and published....

[Mordred]

Roflmao you didn't even acknowledge you were using the fundamental metric in your own personal  fashion. Until I forced you to do so. So good try on that score. Don't tell me I don't recognize what his metric tensor represents.

Roflmao you didn't even acknowledge you were using the fundamental metric in your own personal  fashion. Until I forced you to do so. So good try on that score. Don't tell me I don't recognize what his metric tensor represents.

I bet you cannot even adapt that tensor to polar or cylindrical coordinates which is its very purpose.

The fundamental metric tensor is not fundamental on a particular coordinate basis it is fundamental in its adaptation ability for any coordinate basis. 

That is one of the premises of GR. Mentioned in Principles of Relativity. 

NO COORDINATE  BASIS HAS A HIGHER PRIORITY THAN ANY OTHER COORDINATE CHOICE.

Give me a representation of Sagnac effect on the metric tensor for a rotating body. Which is a part of your paper when you discussed Neutron stars and BH'S.  Though you categorized  them under some  acronym  (I already deleted your paper to trash can) so don't feel like repeating that by downloading it again.

 

Polar and cylindrical coordinates are too easily Google'd 

Edited August 3, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

OK, I just have to reply to that. For the #### time, it is NOT a tensor. It is a metric. You keep calling it a tensor, but it is the metric tensors are derived from.

You didn't "force" me to do anything. You got some ego, there, Mordred. Your perception is warped. You ask a question of someone and then say you "forced" them to admit something shameful.

And you seem to apparently not know the difference between a metric and a tensor, or are you just mis-speaking?.

Singularity, infinitely accelerating expansion! REALLY? So many interesting questions both of those concepts raise, which can't be answered, and are therefore ignored by mutual agreement as per the Copenhagen convention.

What precedes a singularity if everything expands out at an infinitely accelerating expansion? A Big Crunch? Of what? Or is this just it in all of eternity? A 1 shot universe?

What is "outside" the "tiny" singularity? Certainly not space.....that would be part of the universe... How can something perceptually infinite appear to be so small? From what perspective would that be? Outside the singularity? Or from inside, so you would see a boundary?

Where it expanding into? Because it appears to be infinite it can just do that because infinite is infinite so you are really not adding anything?

I am not wasting my time with you anymore as you seem to have a problem with not being nasty and just seem to be so locked into yourself and totally illogical, irrational, theories that you cannot be imaginative enough to even try to view it from different perspectives, i.e., you are BB Blind.

NOT     A     TENSOR

If you want me to respond to you anymore, answer the questions I asked above. Please include a graph or two to really make my day.

PLEASE, ANYONE, answer a single one of those questions........

It seems only you and I are following this thread....... 2....... count them......1, 2........LOL

 

 

 

[Mordred]

Correct NOT A TENSOR so why does your article claim it is Einstein's fundamental metric when it's not?

Get the drift. False claim, you even claimed you got the form in your article from Principles of Relativity. Until I called you up on that..

Just as you claimed you could handle galaxy rotation curves without DM yet could not provide a single shred of data.

 You want to know why I disagree with the peer review process at the site you got published it's for these very lacks in your being unable to provide evidence in defense of your conjecture. If they couldn't spot such an obvious lack of mathematics disquised  as Einsteins metric tensor(fundamental,hell fires the very term fundamental metric pulls up hits on google) I have zero respect  for their peer review process.

 

Edited August 3, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

Because it is. Einstein calls the elements X1,X2,X3,X4, but in developing his tensors they are X,Y,Z,T. He begins with any four X's to show it is universal truth. It doesn't matter what the 4 elements are. Then he develops things on from there. In relativity, the fundamental metric elements become X,Y,Z,T. I would think that is obvious. They are the elements of the quadratic...and he uses them in his spacetime element.

And there you are again, "until I called you up on that...". WT*?

Answer my questions, Mordred......

 

[Mordred]

Did you miss the part about the four momentum ? Did you miss the part about covariant and contravariant terms ?

There is no covariant and contravariant terms with strictly coordinates.

 

Edited August 3, 2019 by Mordred

[captcass]

Ohhhhhh, Mordred! Did you miss the part about this NOT being about TENSORS...... OF ANY SORT?????

Whew. Sorry for shouting.......it really takes it out of me.......

I'm sorry, Mordred. I suggest you re-read the paper until you see it has nothing to do with what you are talking about.

Of course we all think once we understand something that it is easy to understand, and that is definitely me, but it did take the jouranal over a year to consider my paper....

You are simply not hearing me. Other Bangers can see I have a point of view that cannot be demonstrably faulted, something you have yet to even try to do, which is why I was published by Bangers. You want to attack ME. You say there are insuffisencies that do not satisfy you yet, and accuse me of despicable intent and behavior, when, after over a year of review, the journal accepted it. Perhaps you just need some time, too.

Get nice or get lost. It is I enlightening YOU!