Moontanman Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 I have had several papers sent to me as evidence of the supernatural and I find myself outclassed by the concepts to a great degree and would like to ask if anyone else can understand what is being claimed and if these are exampled of peer reviewed papers? http://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Consciousness-and-the-double-slit-interference-pattern-Six-experiments.pdf? https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01891/full?fbclid=IwAR37jC_1Y0NwdtYu2HcLwtHFebdZbbGEWcnWdaC0c7KiW74lje7_vZIACv4 https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.471?fbclid=IwAR3xEL1sQc97SBNqFPaHYphZayZ7oMEiNisu53alhgYE2DBpGqGR_PXlfQA https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40509-019-00209-2?fbclid=IwAR0td3PLVpo_cOkBUvaXstwnxy3cghhTitTFTiUaI8OhNBUeUHiOpXaBzw8 I'm not sure if I'm being dazzled by brilliance or baffled by bullshit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 These don't all seem to be on the same topic. That makes it difficult to discuss. The Rev Mod Sci article claiming macroscopic-scale superposition of position states hasn't been observed is wrong (it has), and I don't see anything supernatural about the abstract. Anything combining consciousness and QM is likely crackpot material, and probably not published in a reputable physics journal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koti Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 2 hours ago, Moontanman said: I have had several papers sent to me as evidence of the supernatural and I find myself outclassed by the concepts to a great degree and would like to ask if anyone else can understand what is being claimed and if these are exampled of peer reviewed papers? http://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Consciousness-and-the-double-slit-interference-pattern-Six-experiments.pdf? https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01891/full?fbclid=IwAR37jC_1Y0NwdtYu2HcLwtHFebdZbbGEWcnWdaC0c7KiW74lje7_vZIACv4 https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.471?fbclid=IwAR3xEL1sQc97SBNqFPaHYphZayZ7oMEiNisu53alhgYE2DBpGqGR_PXlfQA https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40509-019-00209-2?fbclid=IwAR0td3PLVpo_cOkBUvaXstwnxy3cghhTitTFTiUaI8OhNBUeUHiOpXaBzw8 I'm not sure if I'm being dazzled by brilliance or baffled by bullshit... Watch the first 4 minutes of this: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now