Tor Fredrik Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 Above they derive that curl of B is uJ. I know they use the identity So since as underlined above that the derivatives of J is 0 we have that But my problem is why is the derivative of J 0 in general. I have looked at a derivation for this: And the end of this derivation is the following But in the derivation they use that acceleration is constant and that it is a function of E showed in the orange box above. But E does not have to be constant since it is a function of r? So how is this a general derivation for the fact that divergence of current density is 0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 One of the conditions of the derivation is that the current in the wire is constant. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tor Fredrik Posted December 5, 2019 Author Share Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 58 minutes ago, swansont said: One of the conditions of the derivation is that the current in the wire is constant. Why would that lead to that the divergence of the current density is 0. Can you show it mathematically? Edited December 5, 2019 by Tor Fredrik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Tor Fredrik said: Why would that lead to that the divergence of the current density is 0. Can you show it mathematically? The derivative of any constant is zero. That's such a basic understanding I'm not surprised it's not explicitly written down. dC/dx = 0 for C = a constant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now