MigL Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 Trying to consider one common original 'now' is similar to considering an original spatial singularity. GR's applicability has boundries.
geordief Posted December 15, 2019 Author Posted December 15, 2019 1 minute ago, MigL said: Trying to consider one common original 'now' is similar to considering an original spatial singularity. GR's applicability has boundries. Yes I see that.
Mordred Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 6 hours ago, geordief said: If the Earth (or any body or collection of bodies) undergoes changes such as loss -ie redistribution of all the ice in the world , would that cause any change to its the gravitational field? (say measured from the Moon If you change the mass distribution of a body then you will get changes in a gravitational field however some of those changes such as you described would average out. For example the polar ice would become water but the overall mass wouldn't change so locally on Earth you can measure the changes but from the Moon you wouldn't be able to measure the distribution change.
geordief Posted December 15, 2019 Author Posted December 15, 2019 12 minutes ago, Mordred said: If you change the mass distribution of a body then you will get changes in a gravitational field however some of those changes such as you described would average out. For example the polar ice would become water but the overall mass wouldn't change so locally on Earth you can measure the changes but from the Moon you wouldn't be able to measure the distribution change. But you would from the space station,would you? So the measurable difference would extend a small distance from the body? Is there a general boundary for any body beyond which the internal redistribution of mass becomes completely unmeasurable and within which it is measurable?
Strange Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 15 minutes ago, geordief said: But you would from the space station,would you? Not sure about the space station, but it can certainly be measured by satellites, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_Field_and_Steady-State_Ocean_Circulation_Explorer
Mordred Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 (edited) I seriously doubt you would notice at the space station for the scenario provided. The range one can detect changes would vary depending on the overall mass distribution and the amount of change. Think of it this way from the space station the mass of the Earth seems uniform. However one can measure variations in g from various points on the Earth's surface Cross posted with Strange evidently it is plausible to get some anistrophy measurements (Lol guess that can happen when you make educated guesses instead of calculating lol ) Edited December 15, 2019 by Mordred
studiot Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 1 hour ago, geordief said: But you would from the space station,would you? So the measurable difference would extend a small distance from the body? Is there a general boundary for any body beyond which the internal redistribution of mass becomes completely unmeasurable and within which it is measurable? I don't think the space station is equipped for gravimetric surveys (which is what you are asking about) But several satellites have been put up for this purpose over the decades. Their resolution is certainly fine enough to measure such changes. No there is no boundary. Astromomers have had several successes and made several discoveries due to measuring high gravity activity/changes at great distance eg by neutron stars and black holes.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now