Dr. Chetansing Rajput Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 (edited) Sir, I have recently published a paper that reveals THE EXTREMELY PRECISE Pi:Phi CORRELATION, which is firmly premised upon Classical geometric principles. Video Link: DELETED Paper Link: DELETED Edited December 14, 2019 by Strange Spam links deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Promotion and no discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 ! Moderator Note If you wish to discuss this then you need to do it here, not by posting links. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taeto Posted January 3, 2020 Share Posted January 3, 2020 Could the connection not be named after Planck instead of after Strange? The difference between pi and phi is exactly h . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathematic Posted January 4, 2020 Share Posted January 4, 2020 Pi is transcendental, phi is algebraic. It is very hard to see a connection. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taeto Posted January 4, 2020 Share Posted January 4, 2020 (edited) I watched the video, and it comes down to \( \pi \approx 6\phi^2/5.\) The RHS is about \(3.141640786\) so it is not too bad. An author of a paper on Angle Trisection in last year's issue of the same journal, The Journal of Advances in Mathematics, is convinced that the correct value of \(\pi\) is exact \(3.14\). Don't know whether they will clash, or settle on some average as a compromise Edited January 4, 2020 by taeto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensei Posted January 4, 2020 Share Posted January 4, 2020 (edited) Number of [math]\pi[/math] is 10[math]_{\pi}[/math], if we will use base-[math]\pi[/math] numeral system.. Edited January 4, 2020 by Sensei Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathematic Posted January 4, 2020 Share Posted January 4, 2020 13 hours ago, taeto said: I watched the video, and it comes down to π≈6ϕ2/5. The RHS is about 3.141640786 so it is not too bad. An author of a paper on Angle Trisection in last year's issue of the same journal, The Journal of Advances in Mathematics, is convinced that the correct value of π is exact 3.14 . Don't know whether they will clash, or settle on some average as a compromise The value of pi is not something people decide on. It simply comes from its definition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Country Boy Posted February 15, 2020 Share Posted February 15, 2020 On 1/3/2020 at 10:05 AM, taeto said: Could the connection not be named after Planck instead of after Strange? The difference between pi and phi is exactly h . Oh, I like that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taeto Posted February 15, 2020 Share Posted February 15, 2020 10 hours ago, Country Boy said: Oh, I like that! It is a kind of phun 🥳 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted February 15, 2020 Share Posted February 15, 2020 (edited) On 1/4/2020 at 1:38 AM, mathematic said: Pi is transcendental, phi is algebraic. It is very hard to see a connection. Both were originally defined geometrically. Pi = 5 arccos (.5 Phi) (shamelessly stolen from here) https://www.goldennumber.net/pi-phi-fibonacci/ Edited February 15, 2020 by John Cuthber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now