Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Sir,
I have recently published a paper that reveals THE EXTREMELY PRECISE Pi:Phi CORRELATION, which is firmly premised upon Classical geometric principles.

Video Link: DELETED

Paper Link: DELETED

 

Edited by Strange
Spam links deleted
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Could the connection not be named after Planck instead of after Strange? The difference between pi and phi is exactly h :-p.

Posted (edited)

I watched the video, and it comes down to \( \pi \approx 6\phi^2/5.\) The RHS is about \(3.141640786\) so it is not too bad.

An author of a paper on Angle Trisection in last year's issue of the same journal, The Journal of Advances in Mathematics, is convinced that the correct value of \(\pi\) is exact \(3.14\). Don't know whether they will clash, or settle on some average as a compromise >:D 

Edited by taeto
Posted
13 hours ago, taeto said:

I watched the video, and it comes down to π≈6ϕ2/5. The RHS is about 3.141640786 so it is not too bad.

An author of a paper on Angle Trisection in last year's issue of the same journal, The Journal of Advances in Mathematics, is convinced that the correct value of π is exact 3.14 . Don't know whether they will clash, or settle on some average as a compromise >:D 

The value of pi is not something people decide on.  It simply comes from its definition.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 1/3/2020 at 10:05 AM, taeto said:

Could the connection not be named after Planck instead of after Strange? The difference between pi and phi is exactly h :-p.

Oh, I like that!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.