Mordred Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 23 minutes ago, leapyear said: You can rest assured a femtosecond of light is a unit of spacetime. The quantum/classical boundary demands it. MicroMETERS lets us do the math. I think this explains why quantum gravity doesn't exist for quantum waves. The time split in 5 might be telling use there are 4 parallel universes. Why do you keep thinking 5 dimensions for time or that parallel universes are even needed. Time is accurately described by one dimension. A dimension is an independent variable.
leapyear Posted December 21, 2019 Author Posted December 21, 2019 Time is Spacetime. I bring up the parallel universes because the math implies it. It can't be a coincidence that the speed of light x 5 equals that many micrometers.
swansont Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 32 minutes ago, leapyear said: You can rest assured a femtosecond of light is a unit of spacetime. The quantum/classical boundary demands it. MicroMETERS lets us do the math.I Somehow I don’t find this reassuring. there are experimental phenomena that happen faster than a femtosecond. 1 minute ago, leapyear said: Time is Spacetime. I bring up the parallel universes because the math implies it. You mention the math but haven’t presented any. Quote It can't be a coincidence that the speed of light x 5 equals that many micrometers. You’ve been given a number of reasons why it is
leapyear Posted December 21, 2019 Author Posted December 21, 2019 Again, what matters is the size required for the quantum/classical boundary ..and for the time it takes light to travel across it.
swansont Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 6 minutes ago, leapyear said: Again, what matters is the size required for the quantum/classical boundary ..and for the time it takes light to travel across it. What is that size, 0.3 microns? what evidence supports the claim?
leapyear Posted December 21, 2019 Author Posted December 21, 2019 0.3 micrometers is width a femtosecond can get light to travel. 0.3 is around the size of a virus. We can't get a double slit experiment to show us fringes when using viruses.
John Cuthber Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 16 minutes ago, leapyear said: 0.3 micrometers is width a femtosecond can get light to travel. 0.3 is around the size of a virus. We can't get a double slit experiment to show us fringes when using viruses. I doubt anyone ever tried. And, since viruses come in a variety of sizes, it's clear that you are talking nonsense. In fairness, the OP's question is interesting 186282 miles, 698 yards, 2 feet, and 5+ 21/127 inches per second is a weird number.
swansont Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 Quantum effects observed in a 30 micron system, from 2010 https://www.nature.com/news/2010/100317/full/news.2010.130.html 1
leapyear Posted December 21, 2019 Author Posted December 21, 2019 (edited) oh wow, 0.3 becomes 30 ..errr, maybe just for objects allowed to interact with 0.3 objects and not give them a physical state. This explains why quantum weirdness events are allowed to occur in plants and animals Edited December 21, 2019 by leapyear
leapyear Posted December 23, 2019 Author Posted December 23, 2019 Space and Time are directly tied. Or should I say Distance and Time? The frame rate of spacetime has been increased for light to be the speed it is. If I'm right, the quantum/classical boundary should be different throughout the fabric of spacetime ..like time dilation. Time dilation and the boundary must be insane in cosmic voids. This has to by why they are expanding. Spacetime converts quantum waves that have a width of 0.3 or larger and automatically gives them a physical state. The wave is now also a particle, it is in a duality ..the quantum field and spacetime are influencing it. It isn't going to perform quantum weirdness events but will wobble like a wave. Observation can be performed on purpose with smaller objects ..what I care about are the auto-observed sizes. Matter waves not decaying is pretty strong evidence that spacetime isn't involved with unobserved quantum waves. Side thought: I don't think the quantum field has a causality limit for unobserved quantum waves. The reason Einstein failed at a unifying theory is because he refused to believe anything could be without spacetime. I think spacetime is available everywhere ..but is not enacted everywhere. I think Mass enacts it (the boundary). If you toss a rock into a cosmic void, spacetime will form around its mass like a bubble. It will experience the maximum time dilation and quantum/classical boundary spacetime can handle. Because of the spacetime bubble size. If the rock is around the size of the new boundary (for its new bubble) it would disappear into quantum waves and so would the spacetime bubble (assuming the rock didn't have a physical state at the time). Is this why we are seeing stars older than time? Are the stars in question living in cosmic voids? Anything that ages, has a physical state. lorentz doesn't apply to quantum waves without a physical state ..there is nothing to tradeoff
Ghideon Posted December 23, 2019 Posted December 23, 2019 47 minutes ago, leapyear said: .what I care about are the auto-observed sizes. Again: what is ”auto-observed”?
Bufofrog Posted December 23, 2019 Posted December 23, 2019 7 minutes ago, Ghideon said: Again: what is ”auto-observed”? I'm afraid leapyear is no longer with us......
Ghideon Posted December 23, 2019 Posted December 23, 2019 6 minutes ago, Bufofrog said: I'm afraid leapyear is no longer with us...... Good point! But I'm probably too stubborn to not try again in the next thread about this topic. Once they register again.
Bufofrog Posted December 23, 2019 Posted December 23, 2019 10 minutes ago, Ghideon said: Once they register again. Good point.
yearzero Posted December 24, 2019 Posted December 24, 2019 Oh, WOW, this thread wasn't locked! If galaxies are these enacted spacetime bubbles ..do we need dark matter to be a thing anymore? The stars we see moving so fast at the edges of galaxies is due to its own spacetime bubble is mostly sticking out of the galaxy bubble. That star is moving in space with extreme time dilation. We should be asking ourselves how much mass = how much spacetime? I wouldn't want to be the first person to leave the galaxy. You would age and the different scale of the quantum/classical boundary would probably do something awful to your body. Spacetime that isn't enacted would be like a deflated balloon ..lifeless. I'm asking what size the bubble gets per 0.3 micrometer of mass. Is the galaxy a giant spacetime bubble ..or more like a tent city? We can compare galaxies with slow edge stars to ones with fast to give us a clue to the size.
Strange Posted December 24, 2019 Posted December 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, yearzero said: Oh, WOW, this thread wasn't locked! ! Moderator Note We apologise for the oversight. But you must realise by now that sock puppetry is against the rules? 1
swansont Posted December 24, 2019 Posted December 24, 2019 20 minutes ago, yearzero said: Oh, WOW, this thread wasn't locked! ! Moderator Note Yeah, we keep banning you. The idea is supposed to be you don’t come back. You are not welcome at this site anymore 1
Recommended Posts