ydoaPs Posted August 9, 2005 Posted August 9, 2005 omg, my stepdad is watching this show on tv saying that ancient surgury is proof of creationism.
ydoaPs Posted August 9, 2005 Author Posted August 9, 2005 now they are saying neadertals had superglue and that is proof that evolution is rubbish.
ydoaPs Posted August 9, 2005 Author Posted August 9, 2005 roman gynacological instruments are proof of creationism.
ydoaPs Posted August 9, 2005 Author Posted August 9, 2005 tweezers from 400AD is proof of creationism. a drawing of a dinosaur is proof of creationionism. they even said "they could not have drawn them without seeing live dinasaurs."
beautyundone Posted August 9, 2005 Posted August 9, 2005 okay i'm really confused. is this some kind of a joke?
ydoaPs Posted August 9, 2005 Author Posted August 9, 2005 no, it was an actual creationism program. i should have watched it and taken notes. i only caught bits of it. i like how they were saying myan technology disproves evolution. it was this show.
silentsailor Posted August 9, 2005 Posted August 9, 2005 now they are saying neadertals had superglue and that is proof that evolution is rubbish. So now god created superglue?? Let's teach ID in shop class!!! Did your stepdad buy it or was he just watching it for the "wtf" factor?
ydoaPs Posted August 9, 2005 Author Posted August 9, 2005 he so believed this crap. i was telling him that all of it was red herrings and actual false information, but he said "still...".
jordan Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 Do you know why they say these are proof or should we just join you in bashing them first and asking questions later?
ydoaPs Posted August 10, 2005 Author Posted August 10, 2005 they didn't say why, they just said it was. they did have the occasional "evolution says our ancestors were morons" type statement, but that is all and wrong as well. they would just spouting red herrings as proof of creationism. if you don't believe me, watch it. i gave a link, you should be able to get a copy.
beautyundone Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 if you only "caught bits of it" then how would you know they did not have facts to back up some of the arguments?
beautyundone Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 yes, i am aware. but that did not answer my question.
beautyundone Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 what i was saying is that you did not listen to the entire thing; therefore, there were parts you missed. you cannot accurately dismiss the ENTIRE program as being bull if you haven't seen it all. that's all.
ydoaPs Posted August 10, 2005 Author Posted August 10, 2005 i watched entire segments. if every single thing i saw(bout 20 min of a 30 min program) was either a red herring or blatant intelectual dishonesty, it is safe to assume the program was rubbish.
beautyundone Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 oh, alright. from the way you said it, it sounded as if you had only watched small pieces of it. i apologize. it was a misunderstanding.
rakuenso Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 roman gynacological instruments are proof of creationism. ROFL
BobbyJoeCool Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 who believes this stuff? Ancient medical equipment is proof that we were created by God? How? I don't see how they're even remotely connected. Wow. Can you say, "gullible?"
Kyrisch Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 I guess they were going for the "God showed them how to do these things and gave them the tools they needed" thing. But still, that "proof" could've been used for the argument that the Gods of the ancient civilizations were aliens as well. I do not see how this proves *creationism* in the least.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now