fredreload Posted April 22, 2020 Author Share Posted April 22, 2020 12 hours ago, swansont said: Why? Is that based on any physics? Well it's based on speculation. When you got a powerful source of gamma ray, like from a nuclear fall out in mid air. The gamma rays ionizes the air, stripping it of its electrons and create plasma. Now a magnetic field is not EM wave, but a powerful magnetic field could have the same effect, but whether it would emit an EM wave based on impact is in question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredreload Posted April 22, 2020 Author Share Posted April 22, 2020 But magnetic field is an energy, that in itself should work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, fredreload said: But magnetic field is an energy, that in itself should work. I think only if it's moving wrt something else that it can influence; like a conducting wire.. Edited April 22, 2020 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredreload Posted April 22, 2020 Author Share Posted April 22, 2020 59 minutes ago, StringJunky said: I think only if it's moving wrt something else that it can influence; like a conducting wire.. Yes against a conductor, thanks for the correction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiot Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 15 minutes ago, fredreload said: Yes against a conductor, thanks for the correction. Faraday's Law tells us that a changing magnetic field will induce an EMF/current in a conductor in move past. I know of no corresponding law for the generation of photons, do you ? The situation is quite different since the electrons already exist in the conductor, and are free enough to be given an arbitrary amount of energy from the magnetic field / motion interaction. The is no specific quantum of generation requirement. The production of photons would would be a quantum effect such that the transferred energy exactly matches that of the photon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 6 hours ago, fredreload said: Well it's based on speculation. “Speculation” is not a scientific field of study. What you mean us that it’s a WAG. You’re guessing, based on nothing but wishful thinking. Quote When you got a powerful source of gamma ray, like from a nuclear fall out in mid air. The gamma rays ionizes the air, stripping it of its electrons and create plasma. Now a magnetic field is not EM wave, but a powerful magnetic field could have the same effect, but whether it would emit an EM wave based on impact is in question. So your “speculation” is that two different phenomena should behave the same. No, that’s not how it works. It’s not how the speculations forum works, either. 5 hours ago, fredreload said: But magnetic field is an energy, that in itself should work. It contains energy (energy being a property), but magnetic fields do no work (physics work). IOW, energy is not extracted from the field. You might know this if you had studied introductory physics 57 minutes ago, studiot said: Faraday's Law tells us that a changing magnetic field will induce an EMF/current in a conductor in move past. I know of no corresponding law for the generation of photons, do you ? Not a law, but the known ways of making a photon are Atomic state (i.e. electron) transition Nuclear state transition Acceleration of a charged particle Particle/antiparticle annihilation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredreload Posted April 22, 2020 Author Share Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, swansont said: It contains energy (energy being a property), but magnetic fields do no work (physics work). IOW, energy is not extracted from the field. You might know this if you had studied introductory physics Yes the magnetic field exerts a force on the conductor. You grammer nazi caught me before I can edit my statement. A record breaking magnetic field strength is 1200 tesla, I wonder how much energy it could generate on a metal plate. 2 hours ago, studiot said: Faraday's Law tells us that a changing magnetic field will induce an EMF/current in a conductor in move past. I know of no corresponding law for the generation of photons, do you ? The situation is quite different since the electrons already exist in the conductor, and are free enough to be given an arbitrary amount of energy from the magnetic field / motion interaction. The is no specific quantum of generation requirement. The production of photons would would be a quantum effect such that the transferred energy exactly matches that of the photon. Ya, it does not need to be a photon, just energy, thanks for the work you put in Studiot. Edited April 22, 2020 by fredreload Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiot Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 2 hours ago, swansont said: Not a law, but the known ways of making a photon are Atomic state (i.e. electron) transition Nuclear state transition Acceleration of a charged particle Particle/antiparticle annihilation My point is that all the above are fixed packets of energy. A magnetic field is a distribution. 1 hour ago, fredreload said: Ya, it does not need to be a photon, just energy, thanks for the work you put in Studiot. OK but note that your picture includes the second agent, working with the magnetic field, I have taken pains to include. I am a little puzzled by the picture of the hand. Current is allocated to what seems to be the thumb. The force or motion (mechanical agent) should be allocated to the thumb and I would say your picture is trying to offer the left hand rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 1 hour ago, fredreload said: Yes the magnetic field exerts a force on the conductor. You grammer nazi caught me before I can edit my statement. There’s a six-hour gap between your post and my response Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredreload Posted April 22, 2020 Author Share Posted April 22, 2020 8 minutes ago, swansont said: There’s a six-hour gap between your post and my response Apologies, got work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredreload Posted April 23, 2020 Author Share Posted April 23, 2020 With a 1200 tesla based on the field formula F=B^2/2u would generate a force of 5.7*10^11N/m^2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergUpstart Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 On 4/19/2020 at 8:53 AM, fredreload said: So I want to create a device that would emit visible light as a source of electromagnetic radiation. I am thinking of having two electromagnets either attracting or opposing charges that given a strong enough current would generate a strong enough opposing or attracting magnetic field to generate a light source in between. Either that or an antenna that is amped up from radio wave to create visible light waves. Which is more plausible? Put a plate with a gold border in the microwave and you will get what you wanted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now