Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/AMSsymbols.js
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 4/24/2020 at 10:47 AM, Star Walls said:

Anyone know the answer to this?

Expand  

No, but I'll try some logic:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

My answer is

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Ghideon
Posted

A well reasoned post, Ghideon. But

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted (edited)
  On 4/24/2020 at 3:48 PM, Star Walls said:

But

Expand  

I tried to account for that in step 1, I think we mean the same thing, maybe I need to clarify:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Cool discussion by the way! 

 

Edited by Ghideon
Posted

OK, I had a look
 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted
  Reveal hidden contents

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted (edited)
  On 4/25/2020 at 4:04 PM, John Cuthber said:

OK, I had a look
 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

.

  On 4/25/2020 at 4:20 PM, michel123456 said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Star Walls
Posted

Shouldn't be pretty obvious there are not supposed to be any black dots in the solution?

That eliminates everything except choice between 3 and 4.

Now, consider relation between change of the number of dots and rotation steps changes.

Note that number of dots in the box corresponds to the number of ccw rotational steps determining occupied quadrant of each next box (in a row or column). 

@Ghideon got it,  answer 3 is the best fit according to that logic.

Posted

Each row/column follows a numerical sequence, so it must be a 5, then you'll notice two  whites and a black in each row and column. Whites are in the l/r quadrants and blacks in the t/d quadrants, so it has to be 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted (edited)
  On 4/26/2020 at 8:31 AM, John Cuthber said:

Essentially, the problem is not adequately specified or has no unique solution.

Expand  

I agree. Without knowing where the problem comes from maybe it is constructed just to trigger discussion? Which may not be a bad thing!
After reading all the hidden content I find that some explanations requires fewer steps than the solution I suggested, maybe that's more "elegant" than mine and therefore more probable? 
 

Edited by Ghideon
Posted (edited)
  On 5/1/2020 at 5:36 PM, John Cuthber said:

What?

 

Expand  

First row: 2 boxes with white dots, 1 box with a black dot

Second row: 2 boxes with white dots, 1 with black dots.

Same thing with columns.

Sort of inductive reasoning per see. You either see it or not.

One may complain the sample is rather small, but that's almost always the case with such puzzles   

Edited by bluedot
Posted
  On 5/2/2020 at 11:45 AM, John Cuthber said:

Did you see all the other reasoning that disagrees with you?

Expand  

Yes. Before opening any of the spoilers I concluded that choice 3 should be the best fit. And guess what, my reasoning was basically the same as Gideon's one. Interesting, isn't it? Well, I can't be absolutely sure we are right. Knowing the source of the puzzle would be of help. @Star Walls ?

Judging by it's form, looks like IQ test question. Quick google search of the image returned this

Posted
  On 5/1/2020 at 9:48 AM, bluedot said:

pretty obvious there are not supposed to be any black dots in the solution

Expand  

And yet there are solutions, every bit as valid, that do have black dots.

I may be wrong, but I doubt it's from a real IQ test.

They are usually careful to ensure that there aren't too many "right" answers.

 

  • 4 months later...
Posted

 

It is shifting counterclockwise. Initially, a black dot located in up location..
Let's call the four locations - left, right, up, down.
With the rule:.. horizontally, (let and right), should be in white dots
While vertically, should be in black dots.
The shifting follows the 1, 2, 3, 4 pattern
But with exception that if it rest in an occupied location (4 black dots in down location) and will add a supposed to be a black dot
that we derived from the up location... a supposed to be a black 5 dots the possible answer, which is not present in the selection.
So, my guess...
The rule would then be, if two dots have the same color, they change to its opposite color...
My answer then is #3 - 5 white dots located in down location. 
If my guess is correct, for the next shift, 5 shift counter clockwise, it would rest in the right location  with six black dots, id we consider the 3 dots, white which we derived from right location. Is there a sense?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.