Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/autoload/mtable.js
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have been stuck on this problem for awhile and have no sense of it, I have gotten stuff written down but sadly don't have any confidence in my answer. Any help would be absolutely appreciated thank you!!

Screen Shot 2020-05-05 at 8.58.40 AM.png

This is what I have now.
\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{W}^{\perp}=\{p \in P 2 |\langle p, x+1\rangle=0\} \\ \langle p x+1\rangle=p(-1) x+1(-1)+p(0) x+1(0)+p(1) x+1(1)=p(-1) \\ (-1+1)+p(0)(0+1)+p(1)(1+1)=p(0)+2 p(1)=2 \mathrm{p}(1) \end{array}


since we are looking for polynomials such that $\mathrm{p}(0)=2 \mathrm{p}(1),$ and with the definition of $\mathrm{P}^1$ all
polynomials $a x^2+b x+c$ such that $c=2(a+b+c),$ so the numbers a,b,c with 2a+2b+c=0. In terms of linear algebra and the null space of $A=[2,2,1]$ which is dimension 2 and generates the vectors
$\begin{bmatrix}1\\0\\-2\end{bmatrix}
$ and $\begin{bmatrix}0\\1\\-2\end{bmatrix}
$

Which converts back into polynomials to get
$W^{\perp}=\left\{\mathrm{x}^2-2, \mathrm{x}-2\right\}$
Did I solve this question correctly?

Edited by Displayer102
Posted

You can answer question (a) easily, I assume?

And for any q(x) \in P_2 you know the condition for determining whether q(x) is in W^{\perp}?

Posted (edited)
  On 5/5/2020 at 6:27 PM, taeto said:

You can answer question (a) easily, I assume?

And for any q(x)P2 you know the condition for determining whether q(x) is in W ?

Expand  

Can you check my edit to see? 

 

Isn't the basis just the Nul(A) which is the same as Row(A)?

So I have a basis of [1,0,-2] and [0,1,-2]

Edited by Displayer102
Posted

It looks like you are doing more work than you need to. And some mistakes.

Towards the end of your long calculation of \langle p, x+1\rangle you assume p(0)=0? But if p(x)=ax^2+bx+c, then you have p(0)=c. I guess you just forgot to type it in.

So your conclusion that p(x)=ax^2+bx+c \in W^\perp if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 is correct.

And you correctly found two linearly independent solutions to this equation.

Your solution is correct.

Posted (edited)
  On 5/5/2020 at 7:08 PM, taeto said:

It looks like you are doing more work than you need to. And some mistakes.

Towards the end of your long calculation of p,x+1 you assume p(0)=0? But if p(x)=ax2+bx+c, then you have p(0)=c. I guess you just forgot to type it in.

So your conclusion that p(x)=ax2+bx+cW if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 is correct.

And you correctly found two linearly independent solutions to this equation.

Your solution is correct.

Expand  

So after changing that little type, I have correctly shown a and b?

a)p(x)=ax2+bx+cW if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 

 

b) Basis is [2,2,0]

Edited by Displayer102
Posted
  On 5/5/2020 at 8:05 PM, Displayer102 said:

a)p(x)=ax2+bx+cW if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 

b) Basis is [2,2,0]

Expand  

The elements of the basis are polynomials. You correctly found that the polynomials in W^\perp have the form ax^2+bx+c, where 2a+2b+c=0.

The basis of W^\perp  has to be a set of two polynomials which satisfy this. You could choose \{x^2-2,x-2\}. You said this already. Do you know how to prove that the set of these two polynomials make a basis for W^\perp?

Posted (edited)
  On 5/5/2020 at 10:47 PM, taeto said:

The elements of the basis are polynomials. You correctly found that the polynomials in W have the form ax2+bx+c, where 2a+2b+c=0.

The basis of W   has to be a set of two polynomials which satisfy this. You could choose {x22,x2}. You said this already. Do you know how to prove that the set of these two polynomials make a basis for W ?

Expand  

Don't you add them together and set it equal to zero. Then make it a matrix and row reduce them. then after all that its left with have c_1=0, c_2=0 and 0+0

 

But, I actually got those two polynomials from someone else and not 100% sure how to get to those and the person I got it from won't respond to me.

Edited by Displayer102
Posted (edited)
  On 5/5/2020 at 10:57 PM, Displayer102 said:

Don't you add them together and set it equal to zero. Then make it a matrix and row reduce them. then after all that its left with have c_1=0, c_2=0 and 0+0

Expand  

You are doing too much work. 

To show that x^2-2  and x-2 are linearly independent polynomials, you have to show that the equation c_1 (x^2-2) + c_2 (x-2) = 0, as a polynomial equation, has c_1=c_2=0 as the only solution. This is very easy, because c_1 (x^2-2) + c_2 (x-2) = c_1x^2 + c_2 x - 2(c_1 + c_2) = 0x^2+ 0x+0 immediately tells you that c_1=0 and c_2=0, just from looking at the coefficients of the powers of x.

All that is left is to argue why W^\perp does not have additional polynomials in its basis other than these two.

Edited by taeto

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.