Displayer102 Posted May 5, 2020 Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) I have been stuck on this problem for awhile and have no sense of it, I have gotten stuff written down but sadly don't have any confidence in my answer. Any help would be absolutely appreciated thank you!! This is what I have now. \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{W}^{\perp}=\{p \in P 2 |\langle p, x+1\rangle=0\} \\ \langle p x+1\rangle=p(-1) x+1(-1)+p(0) x+1(0)+p(1) x+1(1)=p(-1) \\ (-1+1)+p(0)(0+1)+p(1)(1+1)=p(0)+2 p(1)=2 \mathrm{p}(1) \end{array} since we are looking for polynomials such that $\mathrm{p}(0)=2 \mathrm{p}(1),$ and with the definition of $\mathrm{P}^1$ all polynomials $a x^2+b x+c$ such that $c=2(a+b+c),$ so the numbers a,b,c with 2a+2b+c=0. In terms of linear algebra and the null space of $A=[2,2,1]$ which is dimension 2 and generates the vectors $\begin{bmatrix}1\\0\\-2\end{bmatrix}$ and $\begin{bmatrix}0\\1\\-2\end{bmatrix}$ Which converts back into polynomials to get $W^{\perp}=\left\{\mathrm{x}^2-2, \mathrm{x}-2\right\}$ Did I solve this question correctly? Edited May 5, 2020 by Displayer102
taeto Posted May 5, 2020 Posted May 5, 2020 You can answer question (a) easily, I assume? And for any q(x) \in P_2 you know the condition for determining whether q(x) is in W^{\perp}?
Displayer102 Posted May 5, 2020 Author Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) On 5/5/2020 at 6:27 PM, taeto said: You can answer question (a) easily, I assume? And for any q(x)∈P2 you know the condition for determining whether q(x) is in W⊥ ? Expand Can you check my edit to see? Isn't the basis just the Nul(A) which is the same as Row(A)? So I have a basis of [1,0,-2] and [0,1,-2] Edited May 5, 2020 by Displayer102
taeto Posted May 5, 2020 Posted May 5, 2020 It looks like you are doing more work than you need to. And some mistakes. Towards the end of your long calculation of \langle p, x+1\rangle you assume p(0)=0? But if p(x)=ax^2+bx+c, then you have p(0)=c. I guess you just forgot to type it in. So your conclusion that p(x)=ax^2+bx+c \in W^\perp if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 is correct. And you correctly found two linearly independent solutions to this equation. Your solution is correct.
Displayer102 Posted May 5, 2020 Author Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) On 5/5/2020 at 7:08 PM, taeto said: It looks like you are doing more work than you need to. And some mistakes. Towards the end of your long calculation of 〈p,x+1〉 you assume p(0)=0? But if p(x)=ax2+bx+c, then you have p(0)=c. I guess you just forgot to type it in. So your conclusion that p(x)=ax2+bx+c∈W⊥ if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 is correct. And you correctly found two linearly independent solutions to this equation. Your solution is correct. Expand So after changing that little type, I have correctly shown a and b? a)p(x)=ax2+bx+c∈W⊥ if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 b) Basis is [2,2,0] Edited May 5, 2020 by Displayer102
taeto Posted May 5, 2020 Posted May 5, 2020 On 5/5/2020 at 8:05 PM, Displayer102 said: a)p(x)=ax2+bx+c∈W⊥ if and only if 2a+2b+c=0 b) Basis is [2,2,0] Expand The elements of the basis are polynomials. You correctly found that the polynomials in W^\perp have the form ax^2+bx+c, where 2a+2b+c=0. The basis of W^\perp has to be a set of two polynomials which satisfy this. You could choose \{x^2-2,x-2\}. You said this already. Do you know how to prove that the set of these two polynomials make a basis for W^\perp?
Displayer102 Posted May 5, 2020 Author Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) On 5/5/2020 at 10:47 PM, taeto said: The elements of the basis are polynomials. You correctly found that the polynomials in W⊥ have the form ax2+bx+c, where 2a+2b+c=0. The basis of W⊥ has to be a set of two polynomials which satisfy this. You could choose {x2−2,x−2}. You said this already. Do you know how to prove that the set of these two polynomials make a basis for W⊥ ? Expand Don't you add them together and set it equal to zero. Then make it a matrix and row reduce them. then after all that its left with have c_1=0, c_2=0 and 0+0 But, I actually got those two polynomials from someone else and not 100% sure how to get to those and the person I got it from won't respond to me. Edited May 5, 2020 by Displayer102
taeto Posted May 5, 2020 Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) On 5/5/2020 at 10:57 PM, Displayer102 said: Don't you add them together and set it equal to zero. Then make it a matrix and row reduce them. then after all that its left with have c_1=0, c_2=0 and 0+0 Expand You are doing too much work. To show that x^2-2 and x-2 are linearly independent polynomials, you have to show that the equation c_1 (x^2-2) + c_2 (x-2) = 0, as a polynomial equation, has c_1=c_2=0 as the only solution. This is very easy, because c_1 (x^2-2) + c_2 (x-2) = c_1x^2 + c_2 x - 2(c_1 + c_2) = 0x^2+ 0x+0 immediately tells you that c_1=0 and c_2=0, just from looking at the coefficients of the powers of x. All that is left is to argue why W^\perp does not have additional polynomials in its basis other than these two. Edited May 5, 2020 by taeto
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now