bloodhound Posted August 13, 2005 Posted August 13, 2005 For those who have been out of loop, it seems you can now run osx on x86. From what I have read there are two ways of doing it. no 1. You need at least a SSE2 capable CPU. If you have AMD64 which is capable of SSE3 then apparently you will get every functionality, but sse3 isn't necessary check the following link for more instuctions http://www.360hacker.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1108 screenshots: no 2. is using VMWare, don't need sse2 google to find instructions. Let us know if you have tried it and got it working. I might try it a bit later.
Pangloss Posted August 13, 2005 Posted August 13, 2005 I've been following this with great interest, and have been wondering if it might be time to pick up a copy of OS X and see if I can get it working. I'm an old Mac fan from the early days, and I think another OS option would be really cool.
rakuenso Posted August 13, 2005 Posted August 13, 2005 lol why would you want to... that's almost like emulating linux, only instead your emulating a PoS *nix OS
1veedo Posted August 14, 2005 Posted August 14, 2005 It's not emulating anything, OSX (Tiger) runs on x86 now. Btw, sense when do you need to emulate Linux? It'll even run on an Ipod!
Pangloss Posted August 14, 2005 Posted August 14, 2005 You say that as if Linux wasn't "emulating" something itself. All operating systems are copies or extensions of earlier ideas anyway, if you want to be cynical about it. That doesn't make them bad or worthless. You know, I'm reminded of an old joke from the early days: Q: "What do you get when you use UNIX?" A: "You get eunochs!" (Okay, it works better verbally. But it's still a pretty good joke!)
Klaynos Posted August 14, 2005 Posted August 14, 2005 Mac have built and tested their OS's on different proc types for years...
bloodhound Posted August 14, 2005 Author Posted August 14, 2005 yes, but it's the first time people can get a native install of osX on their computers.
postgrep Posted August 16, 2005 Posted August 16, 2005 Who would want to run OSX on their x86? If they wanted to, they'd get PPC.
bloodhound Posted August 16, 2005 Author Posted August 16, 2005 1)because it's free. (to download) 2)apple is expensive 3)run alongside your normal windows.
1veedo Posted August 16, 2005 Posted August 16, 2005 Wait, it's free!? I'm about to go download it myself! BTW postgrep, Apple actually moved to x86. The PPC, I guess, is no longer going to be produced(?) and newer releases aren't going to run on PPC(?) That's just waht I get from the move. They may still make OS X compatible with the other archetecture.
joerdz Posted August 17, 2005 Posted August 17, 2005 Very exciting! I need a bigger harddrive now. 30 gigs cannot be shared among windows, linux, and OSX.
1veedo Posted August 17, 2005 Posted August 17, 2005 I could make'm fit. 5g for Windows, 5g for Linux, whatever size for Tiger. The rest in FAT as a shared partition (/home, /usr, /windows installs, /osx installs, /shared files).
bloodhound Posted August 18, 2005 Author Posted August 18, 2005 http://osx86project.org/ looks like the official page. they have released some patches including one for the kernel so that you can make Rosetta to work with SSE2 I can't wait to try it out. I just need an external drive, or could do it on a network. edit:when i meant it's free, i meant it's "free" wink wink nudge nudge. there seems to be two versions of image. one the hacked version for SSE2 and the original from the dev kit. There is also a fake from GNAA which loads of goatse and other similar images on boot.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now