Jean-Yves BOULAY Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 The analysis of the quantum structure of the five atomic elements composing the coded twenty amino acids and the four coding nucleotides of DNA working in the organization of the genetic code reveals an opposition of their respective constituents in always an arithmetic ratio of value 3/2 according to the parity of the number of their quantum shells. Also, the quantum analysis of the amino acid Glycine, the smallest component of peptides that can be confused with saturated base, reveals the same arithmetic oppositions of 3/2 value of its components by the differentiation, operated according to their number of protons, of its five chemical groups. Genetic code, quantum physics and the 3/2 ratio Quantum analysis of the atoms constituting the genetic code Jean-Yves BOULAY Genetic code quantum analysis.pdf Within the mechanism of the genetic code and therefore among the twenty amino acids, Glycine is distinguished by its absence of radical. Its radical is reduced to a simple hydrogen atom which in a way simply closes the "base" structure common to each amino acid. The quantum study of this glycined base, identifying with Glycine, reveals singular arithmetic arrangements of its different components. New quantum chart This quantum study of the genetic code is an opportunity to propose a new type of table describing the quantum organization of atoms. In this chart, illustrated in Figure 5, the different quantum shells and subshells are presented in the form of chevrons. At the top end of each rafter are indicated the names of the different shells and subsells; at the left end of these chevrons, the numbers of orbitals and electrons of these different shells and quantum subshells are indicated. At each chevron vertex is the orbital where the quantum number m = 0. The orbitals with positive quantum number m are progressively positioned towards the top of these chevron vertices and the orbitals with negative quantum number m are progressively positioned towards the outside left of these chevron vertices. In the appendix, the same type of table is presented describing the quantum organization of the shells and subshells up to the 5th shell (O) and 15th subshell (5g). This innovative presentation, more explicit in describing the quantum structure of the atomic elements, will be used in various tables of this quantum study of the constituents of the genetic code. 1
Strange Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 ! Moderator Note Do not post in the main Science sections of the forum.
Jean-Yves BOULAY Posted July 21, 2020 Author Posted July 21, 2020 This study describes the real structure of the atomic components working in the genetic code. Everything that is presented there is completely correct. This post did not have to be moved to the "speculations" section but was in its place in biochemistry and molecular biology! This post is unfairly placed in speculation. Please let me know what information is wrong or not verified in this article.
joigus Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 10 minutes ago, Jean-Yves BOULAY said: This study describes the real structure of the atomic components working in the genetic code. Everything that is presented there is completely correct. This post did not have to be moved to the "speculations" section but was in its place in biochemistry and molecular biology! The way I see it it was either Speculations or Nature.
Jean-Yves BOULAY Posted July 21, 2020 Author Posted July 21, 2020 5 minutes ago, joigus said: The way I see it it was either Speculations or Nature. When I show that the components are in opposition of the arithmetic 3/2 ratio, there is nothing speculative about it! What is there speculative in this representation?
joigus Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 OK, then. Let me ask you a very technical question: What's with 2 and 3?
Strange Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 2 hours ago, Jean-Yves BOULAY said: This study describes the real structure of the atomic components working in the genetic code. Everything that is presented there is completely correct. This post did not have to be moved to the "speculations" section but was in its place in biochemistry and molecular biology! ! Moderator Note I suggest you look up "numerology" in the dictionary. Then look in the mirror. Alternatively, tell us which prominent peer-reviewed journal your "research" has been published in.
Jean-Yves BOULAY Posted July 22, 2020 Author Posted July 22, 2020 17 hours ago, Strange said: ! Moderator Note I suggest you look up "numerology" in the dictionary. Then look in the mirror. Alternatively, tell us which prominent peer-reviewed journal your "research" has been published in. If this is numerology, then so is the Periodic Table of Elements! 19 hours ago, joigus said: OK, then. Let me ask you a very technical question: What's with 2 and 3? The first two primes for example. and 2 + 3 = the 3th prime. Just 5 is sum of two consecutive primes. 17 hours ago, Strange said: ! Moderator Note I suggest you look up "numerology" in the dictionary. Then look in the mirror. Alternatively, tell us which prominent peer-reviewed journal your "research" has been published in. Have you a published paper for give lesson? -2
swansont Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 21 hours ago, Jean-Yves BOULAY said: This study describes the real structure of the atomic components working in the genetic code. Everything that is presented there is completely correct. This post did not have to be moved to the "speculations" section but was in its place in biochemistry and molecular biology! This post is unfairly placed in speculation. Please let me know what information is wrong or not verified in this article. ! Moderator Note Speculation sis for non-mainstream science. Unless you can point to a textbook, or mainstream scientific literature, where this is discussed, it is not mainstream science. We require a model, evidence, and/or predictions - i.e. ways to test any conjecture. Do you have any of this?
Jean-Yves BOULAY Posted July 22, 2020 Author Posted July 22, 2020 23 minutes ago, swansont said: ! Moderator Note Speculation sis for non-mainstream science. Unless you can point to a textbook, or mainstream scientific literature, where this is discussed, it is not mainstream science. We require a model, evidence, and/or predictions - i.e. ways to test any conjecture. Do you have any of this? Scientific research is not limited to publications in journals. I believe you have not read the article because you will find in it that all the data is correct. And now that this post is in the speculation category what's stopping debating it. (also, publishing in journals is very tedious, have you tested ...)
Strange Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 4 minutes ago, Jean-Yves BOULAY said: also, publishing in journals is very tedious, have you tested ... ! Moderator Note OK. As you think testing of ideas is unnecessarily tedious, you are clearly not interested in science. Do not open another thread on this topic. 1
Recommended Posts