Hijack from What does it mean that physics it time/CPT symmetric?

[SergUpstart]

12 minutes ago, Duda Jarek said:

Otherwise: if baryon number is ultimately conserved, there remains e.g. Cyclic Universe hypothesis: that baryon number was the same in Big Crunch preceding our Big Bang - shifting this problem to minus infinity.

And what can you say about this experiment conducted by NASA in Antarctica

https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/nasa-finds-evidence-of-parallel-universe-where-time-runs-backward-report/

[Duda Jarek]

36 minutes ago, SergUpstart said:

And what can you say about this experiment conducted by NASA in Antarctica

https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/nasa-finds-evidence-of-parallel-universe-where-time-runs-backward-report/

Parallel universe explanation seems as coming from some Star Trek fans.

Going back to earth, sounds a bit like CPT analogue of laser: with involved particles going in opposite direction, neutrinos here.

[swansont]

42 minutes ago, SergUpstart said:

And what can you say about this experiment conducted by NASA in Antarctica

https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/nasa-finds-evidence-of-parallel-universe-where-time-runs-backward-report/

It's crap. A dubious conjecture from an anomalous signal

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2020/05/21/has-nasa-found-a-parallel-universe-where-time-flows-backwards-the-truth-behind-the-headlines/#1c13e0b9646d

[SergUpstart]

8 minutes ago, swansont said:

It's crap. A dubious conjecture from an anomalous signal

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2020/05/21/has-nasa-found-a-parallel-universe-where-time-flows-backwards-the-truth-behind-the-headlines/#1c13e0b9646d

I agree. Nonsense is not nonsense, and the proof of a parallel universe can not be considered. The anomalous signal could have come simply from outside the Universe. Or even its source was in the earth's crust.( There have been reports of a heat source under Antarctica's glaciers) But the statement about a parallel Universe was made by NASA, why did they need it?

[swansont]

52 minutes ago, SergUpstart said:

I agree. Nonsense is not nonsense, and the proof of a parallel universe can not be considered. The anomalous signal could have come simply from outside the Universe. Or even its source was in the earth's crust.( There have been reports of a heat source under Antarctica's glaciers) But the statement about a parallel Universe was made by NASA, why did they need it?

Did NASA say that? The Post article says "The finding implies that these particles are actually traveling backward in time, suggesting evidence of a parallel universe, according to the Daily Star." (emphasis added)

I don't see a direct quote from NASA making this claim in the Daily Star article. There are quotes saying otherwise.

The blurb "The simplest – and therefore scientifically the most elegant explanation is this: at the moment of the Big Bang two universes were formed – ours, and another one that from our perspective is running in reverse." is unattributed.