Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I noticed in my textbook that the synthesis of AMP uses aspartate as a nitrogen source and syntheis of GMP uses glutamine. Why doesn't the synthesis of AMP require asparagine instead of aspartate, since asparagine has a nitrogen group in its side chain? I thought that the reactive part of an AA was the side chain so it doesn't make sense to me.

Posted (edited)

Apologies, I misread your question, and I was pointing the way toward answering a different question.  Aspartate is also used as a donor in the biosynthetic pathway that produces inosine monophosphate (check the two steps in the synthesis of AICAR) and in the urea cycle.  I disagree that a side chain is necessarily more reactive and can think of some examples to illustrate this.  However,  I am not sure what makes one nitrogen donor used in one reaction and a different nitrogen donor used in another.

Edited by BabcockHall
Posted

Thank you for answering. I always thought that the side chains were primarily responsible  for reactions, but since that is not the case, it makes more sense.

Posted

The donation of the nitrogen & hydrogen atoms and the concomitant production of fumarate takes place in two steps overall.  One way to think about the second step is that it is simply an elimination reaction.  A proton is lost from what was the beta-carbon of aspartate, and -NH3(+) is the leaving group, which departs from the alpha-carbon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.