Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Now we have a group who would import lions and cheetas into the US to create "ecological diversity." How many of us think THAT is a good idea? :D

 

The following is a cut and paste, as it was an article off AOL's welcome page:

 

Group Wants to Bring African Animals to North America

By JOSEPH B. VERRENGIA, AP

 

DENVER (Aug. 17) - If a group of prominent ecologists have their way, lions and elephants could someday be roaming the Great Plains of North America.

 

Scientists say African cheetahs could thrive on North American plains, where cheetahs roamed thousands of years ago.

 

The idea of transplanting African wildlife to this continent is being greeted with gasps and groans from other scientists and conservationists who recall previous efforts to relocate foreign species halfway around the world, often with disastrous results.

 

But the proposal's supporters say it could help save some species from extinction in Africa, where protection is spotty and habitats are vanishing. They say the relocated animals could also restore the biodiversity in North America to a condition closer to what it was before humans overran the landscape more than 10,000 years ago.

 

Most modern African species never lived on the American prairie, the scientists acknowledge. But some of their biological cousins like mastodons, camels and saber-toothed cats, roamed for more than 1 million years alongside antelope and herds of bison until Ice Age glaciers retreated and humans started arriving.

 

The rapid extinction of dozens of large mammal species in North America - perhaps due to a combination of climate change and overhunting - triggered a landslide of changes to the environmental landscape. Relocating large animals to vast ecological parks and private reserves would begin to repair the damage, proponents say, while offering new ecotourism opportunities to a withering region.

 

The scientists' plan appears in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature. It is attracting interest from some influential circles, including media mogul Ted Turner, America's largest private landowner. He owns huge ranches in several states to support his commercial bison operation and personal conservation initiatives.

 

But the plan is also generating criticism on both sides of the conservation debate.

 

Media mogul Ted Turner is interested in the idea, but many scientists say it's misguided.

 

"It is not restoration to introduce animals that were never here," said University of Washington anthropologist Donald K. Grayson. "Why introduce Old World camels and lions when there are North American species that could benefit from the same kind of effort?"

 

Others wonder whether people would support African lions making a home on the range, given the opposition to the reintroduction of native wolves in the rural West.

 

"Just when you think the world has gotten as weird as it can get, something like this comes along," said Steve Pilcher, executive vice president of the Montana Stockgrowers Association.

 

"I wonder how many calves or lambs it would take to feed a family of lions for a month?" Pilcher mused. "We sort of know what it takes for wolves, but something tells me we would be in a whole new ball game."

 

Some wildlife conservationists said the idea would further damage the prospects of both threatened species and Africa's hopes for sustainable economic development.

 

"Such relocations would affect future tourism opportunities for Africa," said Elizabeth Wamba, the East Africa spokeswoman for the International Fund for Animal Welfare in Nairobi, Kenya. "The welfare of the animals would have been reduced by transporting and exposing them to different eco-climatic conditions."

 

Critics also point to calamitous relocations of foreign species in Australia. Rabbits brought from Europe swarmed across parts of the Outback, and noxious cane toads brought from South America to control bugs in sugar cane fields killed native wildlife.

 

The authors of the new plan say they are not discouraged.

 

"We are not saying this is going to be easy," said Cornell University ecologist Josh Donlan, the lead author of the proposal. "There are huge and substantial risks and obstacles."

 

The plan grew from a retreat at Turner's New Mexico ranch - a 155,000-acre property in the foothills of the Gila Mountains that contains a mix of ecosystems ranging from desert grasslands to pine forests.

 

Ecologists are using the ranch to experiment with reintroducing the Bolson tortoise to the region. These 100-pound burrowers were once found across the Southwest, but now survive only in a corner of northern Mexico's Chihuahuan Desert.

 

The scientists' discussion expanded to consider long-extinct Pleistocene species that have modern counterparts elsewhere in the world.

 

For example, a larger American cheetah once stalked pronghorn on these lands, with both species evolving special features that enabled them to accelerate to 60 mph. Today, pronghorns rarely are chased, except by the occasional pickup truck.

 

In Africa, modern cheetahs are being exterminated as vermin, with fewer than 2,000 remaining in some countries. Relocation could help both species retain important traits, the plan's proponents say.

 

Other living species that are counterparts to Pleistocene-era animals in North America include wild horses and asses, Bactrian camels, elephants and lions.

 

Donlan concedes that lions would be a tough sell to Americans.

 

"Lions eat people," he said. "There has to be a pretty serious attitude shift on how you view predators."

 

 

08/17/05 13:44 EDT

 

 

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.

Posted

Yeah, I posted a thread about this too. I think it's a grand idea, but it just can't be done. Maybe little naturalistic breeding parks, but definitely not re-establishing North American Megafauna in wild environments.

 

EDIT: I think the wild horses, the asses, and maybe the camels might be feasible though, except that I'd be worried about the hybridization of the horses and asses with the feral horses and donkeys that currently have footholds.

Posted

while we're at it, let's put dolphins in the alps and release a bunch of wild turkeys into the middle of the pacific ocean.

 

seriously, though. we have enough trouble with wolves and mountain lions. the idea of releasing LIONS into CIVILIAN-populated areas is one of the most ridiculous ideas i have ever had the pleasure of reading about.

Posted

The dolphin/turkey analogy's a bit of a stretch of reason. Those animals, or at least creatures much like them, did once thrive here. Two of the many issues is that science really isn't sure about what exactly killed them off, and whether or not our native environments are still suitable for them. The second thing is, that even if the fundemental enviroment was suitable, it would never work because we've already decimated much of it. All the balances between flora and fauna are outa whack. There are no more great wild herds, unless you count cows, and enormous tracts of pristine grassland adjacent to woodland is hard to come by.

 

we have enough trouble with wolves and mountain lions. the idea of releasing LIONS into CIVILIAN-populated areas is one of the most ridiculous ideas i have ever had the pleasure of reading about.
We're not having trouble with wolves and mountain lions, they're having trouble with us. Meh, who cares about the people. They... ahem...we caused the problems in the first place. I'm more worried about what being so closed to so-called "civilization" and even less aply named "humanity" would do to the poor fluffballs.
Posted

haha, it can be argued from either side.

my point is, it won't work.

and i liked the dolphin/turkey analogy =(

 

and when i mentioned the problems with mountain lions and wolves, i was referring to the fact that people aren't exactly accepting them and they do kill people every now and then. if no one can accept/deal with wolves and mountain lions, i don't think they'll be too fond of regular lions, cheetahs, and elephants.

Posted
The second thing is, that even if the fundemental enviroment was suitable, it would never work because we've already decimated much of it. All the balances between flora and fauna are outa whack.

 

We can easily correct that.

 

All we have to do is kill about 295,000,000 humans and let nature take over again.

 

Does that appeal to you? :eek:

Posted

I just feel sad, because everywhere you look nowadays, cougars and wolves are gettinng a bad rep, and the media always makes it a one-sided attack.

 

I liked the dolphin/turkey thing too, just in my stupid overzealousness, I thought it might have been a little more extreme than the situation warrented. Worry not, I'm seeking out a qualified therapist even now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.