zapatos Posted December 2, 2020 Posted December 2, 2020 2 minutes ago, alusistem said: It's not string theory, it's my theory of the speed of light I asked you how your theory worked and you said 'string theory'. How is it your theory if the way it works is 'string theory'?
alusistem Posted December 2, 2020 Author Posted December 2, 2020 Theory of the Speed of Light By Francisco Gómez Paulet For many years, there has been a mystery in physics which has not yet been solved. The speed of light never varies, we always get the same result. For example, if a light-emitting spotlight is moving towards a device which measures the speed of light at a rate of 1000 km/s, the logical conclusion would be to think that the result would be the speed of light plus the speed of the spotlight, or 301,000 km/s, but this is not the case. The result remains the same with no change seen: 300,000 km/s. The explanation for this phenomenon is very simple. Movement as we know it does not actually exist in the universe. Matter is always fixed. When we believe that an object is in motion, what is actually happening is that the object disappears and reappears in another position at such a high frequency that we are not aware of it. This works much like the frames of a film, where still images create the sensation of moving pictures, only in three dimensions. That is why the photons always leave the emitter at the same speed, even though the emitter is in motion. It is actually in a fixed position at the time the photon is emitted. Matter, like light, travels through dark matter, only at a variable speed between 0 to 300,000 km/s depending on its linear momentum, that is, on the matter's capacity for linear reappearance. Matter vibrates between two three-dimensional planes, when disappears from this in which we are appears on the other plane and so on, the universe has 3 dimensions on this plane and 3 others on the other, along with the time dimension makes a total of 7 dimensions. 02/12/2020 goodbye -1
swansont Posted December 2, 2020 Posted December 2, 2020 ! Moderator Note Repetition is not explanation, nor is it clarification. There’s no actual model, no way to make testable predictions, and you’ve not identified ways to falsify it. You don’t have a theory, and this isn’t rigorous enough to be in compliance with our rules for speculations 1
Recommended Posts