Jump to content

What happens to matter if the mass of the particles increases? alternative explanation to Hubble’s law – the observer’s units of measure changes.


caracal

Recommended Posts

I try to be very brief.

What happens to matter if the mass of the electron, proton and neutron and their constituents increases by same factor? Lets look some of the properties in Bohr hydrogen model. I dont put formulas here but I tell the how they depend on the reduced mass. The orbital velocity, radius of orbit, energy, orbital period.

All other properties except velocity, depends linearly to reduced mass or its inverse. If the mass of electron and proton increases by same factor,say “K”

-the energy of energy levels increase by factor K

-the radius of all energy level electron’s orbit decrease by factor 1/K

-the orbital period time of electron decrease by factor 1/K

The general trend seems to be that matter shrinks, its energy levels increases and duration of all events decreases.

Now I make harsh generalization and claim that all matter, including quarks,gluons, proton and neutron, atom nucleus, atoms and molecules change by same ways than in Bohr model above if all mass of their smallest constituents change by same factor: their energies increase by factor K, their all lenghts decrease by factor 1/K and duration of all of their events decrease by factor 1/K.

 

What would be the possible cause of such mass increase? There could be at least two possible causes:

-Particles gather or absorb small particles, some kind of “mini particles” that are freely moving in space.

-There is mass source in the particle itself that generally does not show itself in the form of mass, but can change to having mass when particle undergo some kind of structural change. (?)

 

Lets now assume that all matter in the universe gain more mass at the same time by factor 1+Ht ,where H is Hubble constant. Let there also be an observer whose matter undergo such a change. This changes his units of the measure by following ways:

-Unit of length decrease by factor 1/(1+Ht)

-Unit of time decrease by factor 1/(1+Ht)

-Unit of mass increase by factor 1+Ht

-Unit of energy increase by factor 1+Ht

And lets figure out how the unit of momentum changes: p = muv ,where u is Lorenz factor.Because unit of velocity does not change, the unit of momentum must change by factor 1+Ht.

If such observer observes a photon that is moving in space, he would observe following changes:

-Photons wavelength appear to have increased by factor 1+Ht

-Photons frequency appear to have decreased by factor 1/(1+Ht)

-Photons momentum appear to have decreased by factor 1/(1+Ht)

-Photons energy appear to have decreased by factor 1/(1+Ht)

This is same what would happen to photon if the space is expanding. So this change in the units of measurement could be alternative explanation to Hubble’s law.

There is at least one problem in this hypothesis – it is the gravitational constant. If the units of measure of the observer changes, and the gravitational constant is universal constant, then the observer would observe that the gravitational constant appear to change.

For example - If the observer observes black hole radius, it would appear to have increased by factor 1+Ht – like all lengths, even when the black hole is not gathering matter. This black hole radius is r = GM/c^2. The measurement of velocity stays constant, so the measurement black hole radius depend on term GM. So if r changes by factor 1+Ht, the measurement of the term GM should change also by same factor 1+Ht. I think this is not what is observed in the field of astronomy.

There is one possible way out from this problem: The gravitational constant is not universal constant, but it depends on the kind of matter that is causing the gravity around it. Something changes in the property of matter to cause gravity when particles gains more mass in the way described above. That way that the gravitational constant could still appear to be constant in the viewpoint of the observer – around the observer in the matter that has gained same mass increase than himself. But now it would not be constant when the observer is observing distant matter when he is looking to cosmic window.

This “relativity” of gravitational constant looks like relativity principle in the relativity theory. The gravitational constant depend on the kind of the matter and the viewpoint – and it is constant in the viewpoint of observer for the same kind of matter that the observer consists of.

But it would also mean the following: If for example the earth would gain mass this way by factor of million if it is possible, it would not collapse to black hole since the gravitational constant of such matter would become weaker.

Its time to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, caracal said:

What would be the possible cause of such mass increase?

That's a very good question

Do you have a very good answer ?

 

43 minutes ago, caracal said:

If such observer observes a photon that is moving in space, he would observe following changes:

Why, ?  Photons have no reduced mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, caracal said:

What happens to matter if the mass of the electron, proton and neutron and their constituents increases by same factor? Lets look some of the properties in Bohr hydrogen model.

Since the Bohr model is wrong, wouldn't make more since to use a better model for your conjectures?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, caracal said:

What would be the possible cause of such mass increase? There could be at least two possible causes:

-Particles gather or absorb small particles, some kind of “mini particles” that are freely moving in space.

What is the evidence such small particles exist, and the required absorption can happen? What are the properties of these small particles?

Why would these small particles be absorbed at the same rate everywhere? A C-12 atom has 6 each of protons, neutrons and electrons, and a deuteron has one of each. How does nature “know” to have 6x the small particles near a carbon atom vs a deuteron, so they can absorb them at the same rate?

 

1 hour ago, caracal said:

-There is mass source in the particle itself that generally does not show itself in the form of mass, but can change to having mass when particle undergo some kind of structural change. (?)

What about particles that have no structure? (e.g. electrons)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.