Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mmmm. I don't know. There are several things going on, and gravity is not helping.

I see it more as an illustration of osmotic pressure, or diffusion, than mechanical pressure. Also increase in entropy.

Pressure would be more like the balls pushing a wall. For that I would recommend computer simulation.

Some like this from Wikipedia:

260px-DiffusionMicroMacro.gif

 

Posted

It's effectively a time reversed Coe and Clevenger test - the progressive fluidisation of a packed bed of buoyant particles rather than the more industrially significant progressive compaction of denser particulates from a suspension. 

I agree with joigus that it's not saying anything significant about pressure here. No measurements seem to be taken so I question whether it's actually saying anything about anything.

Posted

There's certainly mass exchange and pressure effects, including those resulting in buoyancy. I'm sure a case can be made there is plenty of "pressure exchange" depending on how you choose to define it.

Posted
2 hours ago, J.C.MacSwell said:

There's certainly mass exchange and pressure effects, including those resulting in buoyancy. I'm sure a case can be made there is plenty of "pressure exchange" depending on how you choose to define it.

Could one choose to define 'pressure exchange' as an 'exchange of gravitational potential energy'? :D

Not clear on whether pressure is something that can be 'exchanged'. 'Propagated into another medium' for sure, but 'exchanged' usually tends to imply a conserved quantity, doesn't it?  

Posted

how dense are those beads? It could just be that they are floating up due to them being less dense than the water. 

However I could also not be understanding the question being asked.

Posted
8 hours ago, ALine said:

how dense are those beads? It could just be that they are floating up due to them being less dense than the water. 

Yes, that means they will float. But the downflow of water exerts a force as it strikes the beads, so initially the buoyancy can’t overcome this. But the flow rate near the beads decreases after the top fills up, so this force decreases, and then the beads can float upwards.

 

 

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, studiot said:

I can't access the OP post because it "values my privacy"   can we see what it says here please?

It doesn't really say anything. It's a video of some kind of analogical experiment.

https://i.imgur.com/FfWg4GU.mp4

I hope a direct link to the video helps (it's very short.)

Edited by joigus
Posted
18 minutes ago, joigus said:

I hope a direct link to the video helps (it's very short.)

Thanks for the attempted help.

Unfortunately your link is the same as the OP.

 

Here is what I get, I don't deal with outside sites that do this.

link1.jpg.281b38f15ba52ba4765e9859fd283f3a.jpg

Posted
53 minutes ago, studiot said:

Thanks for the attempted help.

Unfortunately your link is the same as the OP.

 

Here is what I get, I don't deal with outside sites that do this.

link1.jpg.281b38f15ba52ba4765e9859fd283f3a.jpg

I'm no expert, but some "nice" sites, after clicking the "more options" button, allow you to disable all the cookies. Others inform you of different kinds (session variables, tracking, and so on). Although it's always up to you, of course.

I'm sorry it didn't work for you. I thought a direct link to the video could work. I did disable the tracking cookies, if I remember correctly. What about just disagree? You will have to rely on the website's honesty, that that will disable all.

Posted
6 hours ago, swansont said:

Yes, that means they will float. But the downflow of water exerts a force as it strikes the beads, so initially the buoyancy can’t overcome this. But the flow rate near the beads decreases after the top fills up, so this force decreases, and then the beads can float upwards.

ah, thank you for the correction.

Posted
21 hours ago, sethoflagos said:

Could one choose to define 'pressure exchange' as an 'exchange of gravitational potential energy'? :D

Not clear on whether pressure is something that can be 'exchanged'. 'Propagated into another medium' for sure, but 'exchanged' usually tends to imply a conserved quantity, doesn't it?  

Technically of course no. One's force per area and the other force times distance. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.