Stegosaurus Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 Let's clearly state that not all 360 degrees of the earth is facing the sun at any given time. The light that lights up those early mornings comes in cycles. This is because the friction is greater at the point at which that earth is facing the sun. Now that the moon is stuck between that friction cuasing it to rotate around earth makes it act like a bouy. Now light will curve around a sphere and this light curve causing it to cause gravity. The friction of light at the focal point of earth actually pushes against it but when it finally reaches the moon at the point when it is at it's greatest distance from earth actually pushes the earth back against the sun. Which in return causes the earth to rotate the sun. Again the moon acts like a bouy when the friction of earth and sun are at it's greatest. Light is the driving force of this inertia and manipulates the force the moon has on the rotation of earth. Light is a wave becuase the cycle of it's nature. If you speed down the friction that light causes you speed down time. Who knows if you increase friction it might increase the speed at which earth rotates. the speed of light from the sun is actually what causes gravity on earth the speed of light from the sun is actually what causes gravity on earth If you can reverse the cycles of light from the earth and moon rotating you can create no gravity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, Stegosaurus said: the speed of light from the sun is actually what causes gravity on earth Do you have a reference to material that have caused you to misunderstand physics? Your ideas does not match observations, examples: 1: If you were correct* then for instance a strong spotlight shining at an airplane at night would affect the airplane gravitationally. But searchlights does not cause airplanes to fall down. 2: Black holes does not give off electromagnetic radiation (light) yet scientists are able to measure gravitational waves from black hole collisions; gravity and light is not related** in the way you seem to claim. 3: Friction, strong enough to affect movements of celestial bodies would have a huge effect on their atmospheres and/or surfaces. We do not observe such an effect. *) You are not correct **) General relativity predicts behavior and interactions of gravity, energy and mass. It is a well tested theory that does not match your claims. Edited January 2, 2021 by Ghideon grammar 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stegosaurus Posted January 2, 2021 Author Share Posted January 2, 2021 The amount of light of a spot light is no where near the amount of light the sun gives of that example doesn't make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bufofrog Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 Just now, Stegosaurus said: The amount of light of a spot light is no where near the amount of light the sun gives of that example doesn't make sense. You should understand that your entire post makes no sense. Also this should not be in the science section, it should be in the speculation section. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MigL Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 10 hours ago, Stegosaurus said: the speed of light from the sun is actually what causes gravity on earth the speed of light from the sun is actually what causes gravity on earth If you can reverse the cycles of light from the earth and moon rotating you can create no gravity. Don't make absurd assertions, which a high school student can prove false. Post ideas beginning with " I think … ", and then provide evidence for your ideas, which we can rebut. on this forum, preachers and bloggers usually end up getting banned. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 36 minutes ago, Stegosaurus said: The amount of light of a spot light is no where near the amount of light the sun gives of that example doesn't make sense. Check the amount of energy per square meter. Also, if you do not agree on the searchlight, please comment on the other two examples I gave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 ! Moderator Note I'm feeling generous in the New Year, so I've moved this to Speculations (even though I can't imagine how the OP can be defended reasonably). Please support your assertions with evidence, and good luck. I'll give you two whole pages to persuade the membership your idea has merit. You get three more posts on your first day (automatic spam protection), so make them count. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MigL Posted January 2, 2021 Share Posted January 2, 2021 Santa must have been good to Phi, and he's paying it forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stegosaurus Posted January 3, 2021 Author Share Posted January 3, 2021 Gideon you can program light from electricity, we have yet to program massive mounts and try to speed up or slow down what's coming around us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 22 hours ago, Stegosaurus said: Gideon you can program light from electricity What kind of programming is that? 22 hours ago, Stegosaurus said: we have yet to program massive mounts and try to speed up or slow down what's coming around us Large enough quantities of mass or energy* will have a measurable effect on time: An observer closer to a source of gravitation (mass) will measure that time passes slower compared to an observer at a larger distance from the source of gravitation. The effect is described in General Relativity. *) E=mc^2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 I’m disappointed. The thread title suggested this discussion would be far more risqué 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MigL Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 (edited) ???? Maybe if it was 'heavenly' bodies, instead of 'celestial' … ( is your mind always in the gutter ? ) Edited January 5, 2021 by MigL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 1 minute ago, MigL said: Maybe if it was 'heavenly' bodies, instead of 'celestial' ... We clearly dated in different leagues 🤠 😎 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now