AlexandrKushnirtshuk Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Source screens. Source links. 1) Perseverance Rover’s Descent and Touchdown on Mars (Official NASA Video) 2) Curiosity Drops in on Mars in High-Res 3) Mars Curiosity Descent - Ultra HD 30fps Smooth-Motion Link to this topic (thread) on NASA forum: Curiosity/Perseverance landing scale comparison contradiction. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) What is your point and what is the contradiction? The Perseverance and Curiosity did not land on the same spot. The Perseverance's landing site is about 2,300 miles (3,700 kilometers) from Curiosity’s landing site in Gale Crater. sources: https://mars.nasa.gov/imgs/mars2020/landingsitemap.jpg https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/mission/science/landing-site/ Edited March 2, 2021 by Ghideon grammar and distance link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexandrKushnirtshuk Posted March 2, 2021 Author Share Posted March 2, 2021 4 minutes ago, Ghideon said: What is your point and what is the contradiction? Most often I am asked about calculations (factual evidence). I made calculations based on factual evidence, which points to scale contradiction in videos of landings Curiosity and Perseverance. That is my point: 1) New model of the Universe. 2) The nature of light and the size of the Universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, AlexandrKushnirtshuk said: I made calculations based on factual evidence, which points to scale contradiction in videos of landings Curiosity and Perseverance How did you check for possible reasons such as focal length, cropping of video and others*? There are a number more plausible reasons than the non mainstream speculations you linked to. *) I haven't checked your mathematics (yet) but what is that calculation supposed tho show? Edited March 2, 2021 by Ghideon gammar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexandrKushnirtshuk Posted March 2, 2021 Author Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) Calculations not accurate enough. Delete this topic. I don't know how. Seems I can't remove own topics. Edited March 2, 2021 by AlexandrKushnirtshuk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beecee Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 1 hour ago, AlexandrKushnirtshuk said: Calculations not accurate enough. Delete this topic. I don't know how. Seems I can't remove own topics. I'm not sure how you are allowed to post any of your nonsense in any of the sciences in actual fact. You obviously have a "not so hidden" agenda in all you seem to post, evident in the fact that most of that nonsense is shut down in time. The moderators are being extremely lenient with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 4 hours ago, AlexandrKushnirtshuk said: Most often I am asked about calculations (factual evidence). I made calculations based on factual evidence, which points to scale contradiction in videos of landings Curiosity and Perseverance. That is my point: 1) New model of the Universe. 2) The nature of light and the size of the Universe. ! Moderator Note 1. Advertising/discussing speculations outside of their own thread is against the rules. 2. You were asked what the contradiction is. This is a recurring theme: you act as though we can read your mind. Posting pictures and gifs with no explanation is woefully insufficient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts