Do you understand the articles on arXiv?

[Alex Mercer]

The physics section specifically. Can you read it like most people are able to read the newspaper? Do you understand what they are writing. Is that like a news place for scientists? Has anything big come from arXiv?

 

Thanks

[joigus]

Those are scientific communications that serve many different purposes. You have pre-prints (highly technical papers that are sent for consideration before they've gone through the peer-review system), lectures notes (of different degree of pedagogical approach), letters, books...

There are filters (not everybody can "publish" there). And whether you can read it like most people read the newspaper highly depends on your level of knowledge as well as on what particular paper you read).

[swansont]

Plenty of papers on arXiv are published in journals, so plenty of good science has "come from there"

Reading the articles there is like reading journal articles. The average person is not going to understand them, and even physicists can have trouble with material outside their area of expertise. I will quickly get overwhelmed by condensed matter, nuclear and cosmology discussions. Even in atomic physics, which is my corner of physics, I will not be familiar with some parts of the discussions. The world of physics is pretty big.

[Markus Hanke]

3 hours ago, Alex Mercer said:

The physics section specifically. Can you read it like most people are able to read the newspaper? Do you understand what they are writing. Is that like a news place for scientists? Has anything big come from arXiv?

As others here have said.
I can generally follow the main ideas and steps of a paper within my own area of “expertise” (I’m self-taught and haven’t formally studied physics), being General Relativity; which does not necessarily imply that I understand every single thing and detail (I don’t), but generally speaking that isn’t needed in order to grasp the general ideas and conclusions. Nonetheless, on occasion there will be publications which I can only follow with great difficulty - in the world of modern physics, one can spend many years specialising and studying a specific area, and yet not know everything there is to know about it. It is not rare that I come across GR-related things which I have never heard of before. In either case, it will never be as easy as reading the newspaper, the subject matter just requires deeper thought, knowledge and attention.

Once I leave my area of expertise and interest though I get lost pretty quickly - for example, most papers on quantum field theory and the Standard Model tend to be beyond me, since I’m not sufficiently knowledgeable about the intricate details, methodologies, and maths of those areas.

[beecee]

Most is way above my fat head, but in saying that, the "Abstract" and  "Conclusion" segements are often readable and even understandable.

[Firebirdy]

Yes, but that is because I have a supply of knowledge to understand them.

[dimreepr]

On 3/17/2021 at 8:52 PM, Firebirdy said:

Yes, but that is because I have a supply of knowledge to understand them.

Do you understand this paper?