To_Mars_and_Beyond Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 Let us imagine we have a huge classical body moving in a vacuum and we want to measure its position and velocity. Is it better to bombard this body with electrons or photons? My uneducated guess from a layman: With electrons because they can convoy more information than photons. Both electrons and photons can be observed at specific places at the sensor (or bubble chamber or whatever), but electrons will change their velocity as a result of the collision. So you have 3d data: change of x velocity, change of y velocity, change of z velocity. But photons only change their frequency as a result of the collision. So you have only 1d data! Am I right?
studiot Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, To_Mars_and_Beyond said: But photons only change their frequency as a result of the collision. So you have only 1d data! Am I right? No, light can be scattered by massive bodies. Edited March 14, 2021 by studiot
To_Mars_and_Beyond Posted March 14, 2021 Author Posted March 14, 2021 (edited) Oh but yes. So you still can change individual components of the photon's velocity. So you would have vx^2 + vy^2 + vz^2 = c^2. That eats up one degree of freedom, but you get an extra one from the change of frequency. Nice. Edited March 14, 2021 by To_Mars_and_Beyond
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now