StringJunky Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Is the spate of clotting cases in the EU a case of false correlation due to coincidence?
swansont Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Quote there had been 15 events of deep vein thrombosis and 22 events of pulmonary embolism reported among those vaccinated. “This is much lower than would be expected to occur naturally in a general population of this size and is similar across other licensed COVID-19 vaccines,” AstraZeneca said. Expand https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/16/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-doctors-react-as-eu-countries-suspend-shot.html This is out of 17 million people DVT is normally about 1 in 1000 per year https://www.stoptheclot.org/the_basics/how_common_dvt/ Seems like this is likely the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy 1
StringJunky Posted March 16, 2021 Author Posted March 16, 2021 (edited) On 3/16/2021 at 12:20 PM, swansont said: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/16/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-doctors-react-as-eu-countries-suspend-shot.html This is out of 17 million people DVT is normally about 1 in 1000 per year https://www.stoptheclot.org/the_basics/how_common_dvt/ Seems like this is likely the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy Expand Yeah, that was what I've read, but surely the countries experts that are advising suspending it are aware of this as well... or is it more likely higher-ups in government over-riding their experts advice? More of a political thing based on fear without substantive statistical evidence, say. This feels a bit like the vaccine-causes-autism fiasco. Edited March 16, 2021 by StringJunky
Danijel Gorupec Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Does the coincidence happen with pfizer too?
John Cuthber Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 12:36 PM, Danijel Gorupec said: Does the coincidence happen with pfizer too? Expand Apparently On 3/16/2021 at 12:20 PM, swansont said: This is much lower than would be expected to occur naturally in a general population of this size and is similar across other licensed COVID-19 vaccines,” Expand
iNow Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 12:36 PM, Danijel Gorupec said: Does the coincidence happen with pfizer too? Expand The coincidence of people taking the vaccine having a LOWER rate of blood clots than in the general population, you mean? x-posted with John
dimreepr Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 11:35 AM, StringJunky said: Is the spate of clotting cases in the EU a case of false correlation due to coincidence? Expand I think it's more political than factual, although I'm struggling to find a reason.
iNow Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 1:42 PM, dimreepr said: I think it's more political than factual, although I'm struggling to find a reason. Expand I’ve heard it suggested that it’s payback for Brexit, but that struck me as conspiratorial
dimreepr Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 1:44 PM, iNow said: I’ve heard it suggested that it’s payback for Brexit, but that struck me as conspiratorial Expand When do politicians need a reason, when any old excuse will do?
geordief Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 Reaching the sufficient number of vaccinated may be a difficult ask so it is important to not alienate those who are hesitant to take the vaccine for any real or imagined reason at all. These people have to be accommodated as much as possible (I appreciate some lives may be lost as a result but that is hopefully short term)
Danijel Gorupec Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 I don't think it is a payback for Brexit :)... I don't think Europeans even know from where AstraZeneca is... I guess it might more likely be because Merkel refused AstraZeneca vaccine.
StringJunky Posted March 16, 2021 Author Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 1:51 PM, Danijel Gorupec said: I don't think it is a payback for Brexit :)... I don't think Europeans even know from where AstraZeneca is... I guess it might more likely be because Merkel refused AstraZeneca vaccine. Expand Why has she refused it?
dimreepr Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 1:48 PM, geordief said: Reaching the sufficient number of vaccinated may be a difficult ask so it is important to not alienate those who are hesitant to take the vaccine for any real or imagined reason at all. These people have to be accommodated as much as possible (I appreciate some lives may be lost as a result but that is hopefully short term) Expand It's only a difficult ask because some people think they're freedom to kill other's, is an inalienable right...
Danijel Gorupec Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 1:53 PM, StringJunky said: Why has she refused it? Expand Who knows (But If you love conspiracy theories, here is a pet of mine -> AstraZeneca promised vaccine shots to Germany, and Merkel promised this to German people... then AstraZeneca sold vaccines elsewhere... Merkel waited to slap them back and the opportunity came quickly .)
swansont Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 1:42 PM, dimreepr said: I think it's more political than factual, although I'm struggling to find a reason. Expand Politics is perception. If people think the vaccine caused it, an emotional response, a whole lot of them won’t be swayed by statistics and statements. So halting the rollout looks like protecting people. And as gordief notes, you don’t want people to have an excuse to not get vaccinated. A delay to “assess” things might be the assurance some people need. 1
dimreepr Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 2:23 PM, swansont said: Politics is perception. If people think the vaccine caused it, an emotional response, a whole lot of them won’t be swayed by statistics and statements. So halting the rollout looks like protecting people. And as gordief notes, you don’t want people to have an excuse to not get vaccinated. A delay to “assess” things might be the assurance some people need. Expand Indeed, but some people think they're freedom to kill other's, is an inalienable right; Antivaxers may as well have a gun in their hand, while they say "sorry, it just went off, but don't take my gun"...
swansont Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 2:34 PM, dimreepr said: Indeed, but some people think they're freedom to kill other's, is an inalienable right; Antivaxers may as well have a gun in their hand, while they say "sorry, it just went off, but don't take my gun"... Expand But you’re not reaching them in any event. This would be about reassuring people who are undecided on whether to get vaccinated
dimreepr Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 2:53 PM, swansont said: But you’re not reaching them in any event. This would be about reassuring people who are undecided on whether to get vaccinated Expand Good point, but the counter arguement is, it dissuades other's; at some point the balance favours the brave politician...
Area54 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 This BBC article is relevant: AstraZeneca vaccine: EU regulator 'firmly convinced' benefits outweigh risks The article notes that "The EU's medicines regulator has said it remains "firmly convinced" that the benefits of the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 jab outweigh the risks. It reiterated that there was "no indication" the vaccine causes blood clots, after several leading EU states paused their rollouts. European Medicines Agency (EMA) head Emer Cooke said the body stood by its decision to approve the vaccine."
Prof Reza Sanaye Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 One good point to be discussed here is how long have other significantly successful vaccines taken to be "developed" before being rolled out onto the public ?? ??
Area54 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 6:12 PM, Prof Reza Sanaye said: One good point to be discussed here is how long have other significantly successful vaccines taken to be "developed" before being rolled out onto the public ?? ?? Expand No. The relevant point is, in terms of subjects tested and protcols followed, do the Covid vaccines compare favourably with other successful vaccines. I am unaware of any other vaccine development that benefited from the intensity of manpower, money and effort. Do you?
Prof Reza Sanaye Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 6:16 PM, Area54 said: No. The relevant point is, in terms of subjects tested and protcols followed, do the Covid vaccines compare favourably with other successful vaccines. I am unaware of any other vaccine development that benefited from the intensity of manpower, money and effort. Do you? Expand You are belittling all the huge amounts of the intensity of manpower, money and effort that had been put into producing other VERY important vaccines. I still believe it is worth it comparing other vaccine developments' time-taking and this one's. It tells us things , , ... , , , . , ., . , ..
zapatos Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 6:31 PM, Prof Reza Sanaye said: I still believe it is worth it comparing other vaccine developments' time-taking and this one's. It tells us things , , ... , , , . , ., . , .. Expand Tells us what things???>>??__>%%^^
Area54 Posted March 16, 2021 Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 6:31 PM, Prof Reza Sanaye said: You are belittling all the huge amounts of the intensity of manpower, money and effort that had been put into producing other VERY important vaccines. Expand No I am not. I suspect, based upon what I have read about Covid vaccine development and vaccine development in general, that the total number of man hours, the total number of test subjects and the total amount of money spent is similar for both. What differs is the the shorter time frame into which that effort was compressed.
StringJunky Posted March 16, 2021 Author Posted March 16, 2021 On 3/16/2021 at 6:52 PM, Area54 said: No I am not. I suspect, based upon what I have read about Covid vaccine development and vaccine development in general, that the total number of man hours, the total number of test subjects and the total amount of money spent is similar for both. What differs is the the shorter time frame into which that effort was compressed. Expand "The most effort in the shortest time IN HISTORY!!!" ...as Mr Trump might say.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now