Ozone hole (split from VLF Ozone Hole Patch?)

[King David]

Have anyone of you ever considered that the holes in the Ozone was first started when Man sent the first Rocket from the earth out of our atmosphere.

This is my Hypothesis.

We burst our Magnetospheric bubble per say and allowed the degradation of the Ozone to begin at that very moment

Imagine a blowtorch when it burns through steel it's a blowout.

The Earths atmosphere is designed to envelop incoming asteroids when they enter in.

But was not designed for an avulsion when the rockets leave the atmosphere.

It's against Natural Processes.

Just a Hypothesis please consider it with an open mind.

 

[Area54]

32 minutes ago, King David said:

Have anyone of you ever considered that the holes in the Ozone was first started when Man sent the first Rocket from the earth out of our atmosphere.

I hadn't considered it until now. Having done so I find it implausible. These are some of the reasons for that finding, in no particular order.

• There is no evidence that the "magnetospheric bubble" has been burst.
• Rockets do not ascend through the polar regions.
• Many more rockets are being launched now, yet the ozone hole is slowly disappearing.
• We have a satisfactory mechanism to explain the ozone hole that has been validated.

Additionally, the Earth's atmosphere is not designed. It is certainly not designed to "envelope incoming asteroids".

But thank you for calling it a hypothesis, not a theory.

[John Cuthber]

1 hour ago, King David said:

Just a Hypothesis please consider it with an open mind.

I'm curious.

Why didn't you consider it with an open mind?

 

If you had, you would have realised that we keep on sending rockets, but the hole is shrinking.
So, it's obvious that the idea is wrong.

Why didn't you notice that?

[Phi for All]

2 hours ago, King David said:

This is my Hypothesis.

!

Moderator Note

We have a section for non-mainstream speculations. What you've done here is hijack someone else's thread with your own pet concept, and that's against the  rules.

If you're willing to support your hypothesis with evidence, I can split this off into it's own thread. You'd also have to defend this concept of design as well, which seems unsupportable without some kind of magic or religion or other supernatural means.