1veedo Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 And if it's like reyam200 said, gay people could still have sex with women.
Christ slave Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 also, homosexuality is[/b'] a choice, yes some people may have a tendency to be that way, mabye because of a nuro chemical imbalence. or gene lke you said(saw a show about it. discovery chanel)but it never eliminates the choice to be heterosexual aka straight. Well, yes you can choose to be "heterosexual" but it will require the dedication to recognize your true potential/identity, but at this pivotal point in earth's time, being the dawn of the Age of Aquarius, believe it or not, most people who are "homosexual" are souls who need to overcome the imbalance before they make their ascension from earth (stop reincarnating). So, at this point, homosexuality is mainly a hinderance which can be overcome and then the soul at that point, as is the case with me it sure does seem, overcomes all sexuality, as indeed I am fine as not needing physical contact with another person ever, including masturbation and other various animalistic desires. I have transcended sexuality and continue to do so, so choosing to not be homosexual doesn't mean you must go or act heterosexually, but that you defy the false sense of identity.
BobbyJoeCool Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 yes, but if you don't feel anything towards women, and are attracted to men. is it really a choice? I'm attracted to a girl I know. But I know that any form of relationship would be massivly destructive for both of us, especially her. So I don't get invloved. If I were completely homosexual, I could choose to ignore my attraction to guys and force myself into a relationship with a girl, yet not be attracted to her. Many homosexuals get married to a woman. They make that choice.
reyam200 Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 yes cpl , you can still choose to go against the feelings and to be with a woman.
BobbyJoeCool Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 heterosexual aka straight. ok. if I may make a request here... can we not use "slang" terms such as these? I don't necesarily find it offencive (I get a lot worse from people around here), but it can be... psudo-instulting, as if you were suggesting that anyone who isn't heterosexual isn't straight or normal somehow. Espcially since "normal" is a relative term. Thanks.
reyam200 Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 i won't use that term anymore. its just heterosexuall is also know as straight, not as often anymore since homosexuality is becoming common and socily acceptable. im sorry if i offended anyone.
BobbyJoeCool Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 I have a dislike for many slang terms. Ok, most. Because most of them are just flat out insulting or degrading to a person. I've gotten used to it (and anyone who is the way I am is probably used to it too). It's just that it can annoy me when people use those kinds of terms, aimed at me specifically, a group I'm a part of (chess club for instance), or even something I'm not involved with at all. I don't take offence from them, but I can get annoyed. And for the most part, the people here are VERY nice about it. I haven't heard anything that made me feel instulted, or "put-down" and that's different for me.
CPL.Luke Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 If I recall correctly isn't there a very high rate of divorce among homosexuals who get married to women they really aren't attracted to?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now