Dual power in the modern world.

[altaylar2000]

I think most people get the wrong picture when they say that this country is doing something against that country and so on.
In fact, from about the beginning of our era, dual power was established throughout the world, power was divided into priestly and royal. These are kshatriyas and brahmanas, church and kings and the like, all this was all over the world and only the Asiatic Huns preserved the classical patriarchy.
At the same time, the power of the priesthood was apparently transnational.
The royal power has mutated into the executive, and the priestly into the legislative (which puts the right people with the help of ochlocracy). The executive branch became secondary.
Formally, there are still branches of power there, but that doesn't matter.

Therefore, to say in the categories "the country is doing something" is not correct.
There is a constant struggle, and sometimes the executive branch can gain independence and fight against legislators, a typical example of this Kennedy

 

And at the same time, the division into parties in parliament is usually a fiction, as, for example, there is almost no fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats, it all comes down to insignificant formalities, and the general policy remains the same