Jump to content

Time to talk about UFO's or now as the military calls them UAP's?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, beecee said:

It's interesting to compare this document with a couple of slides from Special Report #14:, as released under Project Bluebook in 1955.  (https://archive.org/details/ProjectBlueBookSpecialReport14/page/n1/mode/2up)

Clearly significantly more time and attention was given to this issue in 1955 when the Special Report was released, judging by the sheer volume of data included in the report, as well as the depth of analysis directed at the subject.  

A couple of slides from Special Report #14 distinguishing between the different categories of identification.3.thumb.png.91c7852276ed7dce26ad4a88f14a0881.png1951365013_ScreenShot2021-06-26at16_08_34.thumb.png.fb88e00107b013a7cadf4e744808b3bf.png

 

Edited by Alex_Krycek
Posted

While I've only heard preliminary reports on the UAP phenomenon released by the military the most surprising thing so far was the admission the objects represented a danger to national security. The admission the UAPs were associated with unusual RF emission was interesting. The military wanting UAPs to be reported and saying no disciplinary actions or other negative impacts on people reporting these sightings was a step forward as well. 

  

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.