The cause of the beginning of the expansion?

[Sócrates Georges Petrakis]

Good Morning!
Considering the Universe in a state of maximum contraction, with no spaces for the existence of wave propagation (or existence of pure energy) and completely static (to start or end any motion (expansion) any existence must be at rest), that is , without particles or interaction between them, why are there still hypotheses trying to use quantum physics or relativity to try to describe this instant for the beginning of an expansion?

in short:

(Google translator)

Any mass at rest has a certain energy (from the interaction between the components that form it at any level).
If this interaction ends, it will have all this energy equivalent to: E = Mo x c².
that is, all internal interaction energies (gravitational potential, kinetic, atomic, quantum, etc.) would be represented by: E = Mo x c²;
In contraction or maximum expansion (only in these cases), could the Universe be considered a mass at rest?
(before starting any motion (expansion) it is necessary to be in complete rest!).
Being at rest and in maximum contraction, the universe could be:
Virtually without internal space for motion existence?
No wave propagation (energy)?
No interactions or particles?
Be interpreted without the use of quantum physics or kinetic energy?
For having to conserve its energy: (the universe cannot have arisen out of nowhere):
The only possible energy to exist is the potential gravitational energy?

Following this logic, in the instants of maximum contraction or expansion (Instances of complete rest),
would it be possible to determine the structure of the Universe for the beginning or the end of its expansion?

There is already a published article that follows this logic, respects bigbang (the part already proven) and uses a very simple relativity because it considers that even concentrated universal components are not concentrated in a single point, but by centrifugation they are concentrated to the maximum throughout a single dimension!

The conception of the universe begins as the maximum region delimited with the existence of mass and energy! So space between masses composed the universe and external space that is not between masses is outside the universe!

To start an expansion the universe has energy!
To start a motion (expansion) has to be stop (static)!
A universe so contracted , has no space for the existence of particles or quantum physics or waves! 
There will be no kinect energy! 
The only possible existing energy is the gravitational potential!
So there has to be mass and no start with exclusively energy! 
And  explain how the potential gravitational energy can initiate the expansion motion in two steps!
So we are in phase of acelerated expansion!

It seems more coherent to me than believing that the universe came out of nowhere, multi-universes or multidimensions!

I don't send the article because I don't know if this forum allows it! but I would like some specialist answer these questions if possible!
Thank you!

[swansont]

34 minutes ago, Sócrates Georges Petrakis said:

I don't send the article because I don't know if this forum allows it!

!

Moderator Note

You should link to it, for reference

 

[Sócrates Georges Petrakis]

19 hours ago, Sócrates Georges Petrakis said:

Good Morning!
Considering the Universe in a state of maximum contraction, with no spaces for the existence of wave propagation (or existence of pure energy) and completely static (to start or end any motion (expansion) any existence must be at rest), that is , without particles or interaction between them, why are there still hypotheses trying to use quantum physics or relativity to try to describe this instant for the beginning of an expansion?

in short:

(Google translator)

Any mass at rest has a certain energy (from the interaction between the components that form it at any level).
If this interaction ends, it will have all this energy equivalent to: E = Mo x c².
that is, all internal interaction energies (gravitational potential, kinetic, atomic, quantum, etc.) would be represented by: E = Mo x c²;
In contraction or maximum expansion (only in these cases), could the Universe be considered a mass at rest?
(before starting any motion (expansion) it is necessary to be in complete rest!).
Being at rest and in maximum contraction, the universe could be:
Virtually without internal space for motion existence?
No wave propagation (energy)?
No interactions or particles?
Be interpreted without the use of quantum physics or kinetic energy?
For having to conserve its energy: (the universe cannot have arisen out of nowhere):
The only possible energy to exist is the potential gravitational energy?

Following this logic, in the instants of maximum contraction or expansion (Instances of complete rest),
would it be possible to determine the structure of the Universe for the beginning or the end of its expansion?

There is already a published article that follows this logic, respects bigbang (the part already proven) and uses a very simple relativity because it considers that even concentrated universal components are not concentrated in a single point, but by centrifugation they are concentrated to the maximum throughout a single dimension!

The conception of the universe begins as the maximum region delimited with the existence of mass and energy! So space between masses composed the universe and external space that is not between masses is outside the universe!

To start an expansion the universe has energy!
To start a motion (expansion) has to be stop (static)!
A universe so contracted , has no space for the existence of particles or quantum physics or waves! 
There will be no kinect energy! 
The only possible existing energy is the gravitational potential!
So there has to be mass and no start with exclusively energy! 
And  explain how the potential gravitational energy can initiate the expansion motion in two steps!
So we are in phase of acelerated expansion!

It seems more coherent to me than believing that the universe came out of nowhere, multi-universes or multidimensions!

I don't send the article because I don't know if this forum allows it! but I would like some specialist answer these questions if possible!
Thank you!

OK! Thank you! the forum allows  to quote reference!
The link :    http://www.ijaresm.com/uploaded_files/document_file/S%C3%B3crates_Georges_Petrakisw2Ie.pdf

[Phi for All]

2 hours ago, Sócrates Georges Petrakis said:

OK! Thank you! the forum allows  to quote reference!

!

Moderator Note

You can't use your own non-mainstream work as evidence to support your own non-mainstream ideas. I'm moving this thread to Speculations, where you need to support your concept using mainstream science and valid reasoning. You should start by giving us an overview of the idea, since people need to be able to participate without going offsite or downloading anything.

 

[Sócrates Georges Petrakis]

2 hours ago, Phi for All said:

!

Moderator Note

You can't use your own non-mainstream work as evidence to support your own non-mainstream ideas. I'm moving this thread to Speculations, where you need to support your concept using mainstream science and valid reasoning. You should start by giving us an overview of the idea, since people need to be able to participate without going offsite or downloading anything.

 

OK! I will try to follow what you said! Sorry, I didn't know which forum to participate in! I hope that the speculation forum will also have an expert to discuss this method or ideas! thank you! And congratulations for the variety of forum options you have!

OK! I will try to follow what you said! Sorry, I didn't know which forum to participate in! I hope that the speculation forum will also have an expert to discuss this method or ideas! thank you! And congratulations for the variety of forum options you have!