Jump to content

1D transverse-field Ising model - what is the difference between its classical and quantum treatment?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The 1D transverse field Ising model

obraz.png.ba4f8447982222c1d718ffefe22d1b0b.png

is usually solved in quantum way, but we can also solve it classically - parametrize angles of spins and use Boltzmann ensemble of sequences of spin angles:

Pr(σ)exp(H(σ)for  σ=((cos(αi),sin(αi)))iZ

getting Markov process of angles, which can be easily approximated with Maximal Entropy Random Walk, for example getting below

joint distributions for (αi, αi+1) for various parameters (Section III here ) :

enter image description here

As intuition suggests, there is some thermal wobbling of spin directions: (anti)aligned for dominating J, in x axis for dominating h.

However, in quantum approaches there are only considered spins in four directions, so should we imagine that intermediate angles are obtained by superposition?

Should there be thermal wobbling of spin directions as in densities above?

What are the differences in interpretation and predictions between such looking natural classical treatment and the quantum one?

Edited by Duda Jarek

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.