SergUpstart Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 I wonder if experiments have been conducted to test whether an electrophor machine (the Wimshurst electrostatic generator) will work in a vacuum. In theory, such experiments should have been carried out, because this question interests not only me, but I did not manage to Google or Youtube anything on this issue.
exchemist Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, SergUpstart said: I wonder if experiments have been conducted to test whether an electrophor machine (the Wimshurst electrostatic generator) will work in a vacuum. In theory, such experiments should have been carried out, because this question interests not only me, but I did not manage to Google or Youtube anything on this issue. Why do you think they should have been carried out in theory? In theory, surely, a Wimshurst machine will work perfectly well in a vacuum, won't it? I can't see that it relies on the atmosphere in order to function. Or do you see it differently? Edited May 27, 2021 by exchemist
SergUpstart Posted May 27, 2021 Author Posted May 27, 2021 19 minutes ago, exchemist said: Why do you think they should have been carried out in theory? In theory, surely, a Wimshurst machine will work perfectly well in a vacuum, won't it? I can't see that it relies on the atmosphere in order to function. Or do you see it differently? That's exactly what is theoretical, but have these theoretical assumptions been tested by experiment? In addition, many believe that the disks of this generator are electrified by friction with the air.
exchemist Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 4 minutes ago, SergUpstart said: That's exactly what is theoretical, but have these theoretical assumptions been tested by experiment? In addition, many believe that the disks of this generator are electrified by friction with the air. Can you provide a reference to somebody authoritative who says this? It is not my understanding of how this machine works.
studiot Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 (edited) Firstly, yes the machine would operate satisfactorily in a vacuum. However a source of drive for the contra rotating disks is required. Sealing the drive might be possible with today's technology, but Wimhurst certainly did not have access to such means. Would anyoneone like me to post a description of the operation of the machine ? Edit. The actual operation of machine is not simple and does require a 'seed' charge to get the whole process going, but this could come from anywhere and may well come from the atmosphere if there is one. But the machine is still physically mounted and charge may arrive via its mountings. There must be a limit to how fast this process can occur, but the basic 'charge multiplication process' does not depend upon the presence or absence of air. Edited May 27, 2021 by studiot
SergUpstart Posted May 27, 2021 Author Posted May 27, 2021 (edited) 20 minutes ago, studiot said: Would anyoneone like me to post a description of the operation of the machine ? Yes, I would appreciate it 20 minutes ago, studiot said: Sealing the drive might be possible with today's technology, but Wimhurst certainly did not have access to such means. It is enough to put the whole device in a vacuum together with the electric motor and battery and in the days of Wimhurst, it was possible to use a spring motor, as in wind-up children's toys Edited May 27, 2021 by SergUpstart
studiot Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, SergUpstart said: It is enough to put the whole device in a vacuum together with the electric motor and battery and in the days of Wimhurst, it was possible to use a spring motor, as in children's toys The purpose of the WM is to convert mechanical energy to electrical energy to charge a battery. A bit ironic to need a battery and motor to provide the mechanical drive ? Obviously you would get back less than you put in. 9 minutes ago, SergUpstart said: Yes, I would appreciate it Sorry, missed the reference again. Electricity and Magnetism for Degree Students by Starling and Woodall. First published 1912. eight edition 1953 Edited May 27, 2021 by studiot 1
John Cuthber Posted May 28, 2021 Posted May 28, 2021 (edited) 22 hours ago, studiot said: Sealing the drive might be possible with today's technology, but Wimhurst certainly did not have access to such means. James Wimshurst would have laughed at you and installed a clockwork motor or a magnetic drive. I don't know about Wimshurst generators, but it is common for Van de Graaff generators to be run in pressure chambers. High pressure sulphur hexafluoride is used as an insulator. 22 hours ago, studiot said: The purpose of the WM is to convert mechanical energy to electrical energy to charge a battery. Unless your battery has something like ten thousand cells in series, that's a horribly inefficient set-up. Edited May 28, 2021 by John Cuthber
studiot Posted May 28, 2021 Posted May 28, 2021 3 hours ago, John Cuthber said: James Wimshurst would have laughed at you and installed a clockwork motor or a magnetic drive. I don't know about Wimshurst generators, but it is common for Van de Graaff generators to be run in pressure chambers. High pressure sulphur hexafluoride is used as an insulator. I'm glad someone loves me.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now