StringJunky Posted February 7, 2022 Posted February 7, 2022 (edited) It appears that talc is magnesium silicate and some natural asbestos-types, are the same compound. Is it the physical structure, due to geological stresses, that defines the difference? Edited February 7, 2022 by StringJunky
John Cuthber Posted February 7, 2022 Posted February 7, 2022 They are different materials. Talc is a hydrated mag. silicate Mg3Si4O10(OH)2 One formula given for amosite is Fe7Si8O22(OH)2 crocidolite is Na2FeI3FeIII2Si8O22(OH)2. And so on... 2
exchemist Posted February 7, 2022 Posted February 7, 2022 9 hours ago, StringJunky said: It appears that talc is magnesium silicate and some natural asbestos-types, are the same compound. Is it the physical structure, due to geological stresses, that defines the difference? They have different composition, as @John Cuthberhas explained. My understanding is that the different physical appearance is due to the way the minerals cleave. Talc easily cleaves along a plane, in one dimension, into 2D sheets, rather as graphite and the micas do. Asbestos minerals cleave along two planes, more or less perpendicular to one another, resulting in 1D fibres. The behaviour depends on whether the crystal structure is in the form of sheets or chains of the silicate tetrahedra in the mineral. 1
joigus Posted February 7, 2022 Posted February 7, 2022 1 hour ago, John Cuthber said: crocidolite is Na2FeI3FeIII2Si8O22(OH)2. It's II-oxidation number for ferrous iron, isn't it?
chenbeier Posted February 7, 2022 Posted February 7, 2022 It has to be. 2*1+3*2+2*3+8*4 = 46 to 22*(-2)+2*(-1) = -46
StringJunky Posted February 7, 2022 Author Posted February 7, 2022 Cheers chaps. I was trying to figure where the asbestos come from in talc. I had a read about the J&J litigation.
exchemist Posted February 7, 2022 Posted February 7, 2022 9 minutes ago, StringJunky said: Cheers chaps. I was trying to figure where the asbestos come from in talc. I had a read about the J&J litigation. I gather they are often found together in nature (both metamorphic products of ultramafic minerals like olivine, I think), so measures have to be taken to ensure commercial talcum powder does not contain any asbestos. 1
StringJunky Posted February 8, 2022 Author Posted February 8, 2022 (edited) 13 hours ago, exchemist said: I gather they are often found together in nature (both metamorphic products of ultramafic minerals like olivine, I think), so measures have to be taken to ensure commercial talcum powder does not contain any asbestos. Cheers. The common one it seems found in talc that's fibrous is: "Anthophyllite is an amphibole mineral: Mg2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2" . What's with the Mg2Mg....in that formula, why not 3Mg....? Edited February 8, 2022 by StringJunky
chenbeier Posted February 8, 2022 Posted February 8, 2022 (edited) It should be Mg6Si8O22(OH)2. in Comparison to Na2FeI3FeIII2Si8O22(OH)2. Edited February 8, 2022 by chenbeier 1
StringJunky Posted February 8, 2022 Author Posted February 8, 2022 1 hour ago, chenbeier said: It should be Mg6Si8O22(OH)2. in Comparison to Na2FeI3FeIII2Si8O22(OH)2. Thanks
chenbeier Posted February 8, 2022 Posted February 8, 2022 (edited) It is one Mg missing, it has to be Mg7Si8O22(OH)2. Edited February 8, 2022 by chenbeier 1
exchemist Posted February 8, 2022 Posted February 8, 2022 9 hours ago, StringJunky said: Cheers. The common one it seems found in talc that's fibrous is: "Anthophyllite is an amphibole mineral: Mg2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2" . What's with the Mg2Mg....in that formula, why not 3Mg....? I think this indicates that Mg appears in 2 different sites in the lattice and can be partially replaced by other cations, such as Ca++ or Fe ++, in the first position in related amphiboles. But I'm not 100% sure. The compositional ranges of these silicate minerals are not exact and are very complicated. 1
StringJunky Posted February 8, 2022 Author Posted February 8, 2022 From Wiki: "☐Mg2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2 (☐ is for a vacancy, a point defect in the crystal structure." Could that explain it? I wouldn't like that in my lungs!
exchemist Posted February 8, 2022 Posted February 8, 2022 57 minutes ago, StringJunky said: From Wiki: "☐Mg2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2 (☐ is for a vacancy, a point defect in the crystal structure." Could that explain it? I wouldn't like that in my lungs! Yes I saw the square and the note too, but I'm not sure what it signifies. In the structure, I think there are both octahedral sites (6 coordination) and tetrahedral sites (4 coordination) for cations, which glue together anionic double chains of silicate tetrahedra. It may be that the Mg2 denotes occupancy of the tetrahedral and Mg5 occupancy of the octahedral sites in the lattice. Maybe the defect remark indicates a repeating gap (vacant site), necessitated by electric charge neutrality if all the cations are divalent. (There are some structures with monovalent cations, eg Na+, where more of these sites would be filled, I think.) But I"m guessing and unfortunately I can't find anything on the web that gives me a structure or explanation clear enough resolve the issue. Maybe if we have a mineralogist on the forum he or she could interject. I am conscious that I am approaching the bullshit threshold. 1
studiot Posted February 8, 2022 Posted February 8, 2022 2 hours ago, StringJunky said: I wouldn't like that in my lungs! This article may interest you. Quote https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.261055070 Abstract Pneumoconiosis may be classified as either fibrotic or nonfibrotic, according to the presence or absence of fibrosis. Silicosis, coal worker pneumoconiosis, asbestosis, berylliosis, and talcosis are examples of fibrotic pneumoconiosis. Siderosis, stannosis, and baritosis are nonfibrotic forms of pneumoconiosis that result from inhalation of iron oxide, tin oxide, and barium sulfate particles, respectively. In an individual who has a history of exposure to silica or coal dust, a finding of nodular or reticulonodular lesions at chest radiography or small nodules with a perilymphatic distribution at thin-section computed tomography (CT), with or without eggshell calcifications, is suggestive of silicosis or coal worker pneumoconiosis. Magnetic resonance imaging is helpful for distinguishing between progressive massive fibrosis and lung cancer. CT and histopathologic findings in asbestosis are similar to those in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but the presence of asbestos bodies in histopathologic specimens is specific for the diagnosis of asbestosis. Giant cell interstitial pneumonia due to exposure to hard metals is classified as a fibrotic form of pneumoconiosis and appears on CT images as mixed ground-glass opacities and reticulation. Berylliosis simulates pulmonary sarcoidosis on CT images. CT findings in talcosis include small centrilobular and subpleural nodules or heterogeneous conglomerate masses that contain foci of high attenuation indicating talc deposition. Siderosis is nonfibrotic and is indicated by a CT finding of poorly defined centrilobular nodules or ground-glass opacities.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now