Snowbeaver Posted April 28, 2022 Posted April 28, 2022 Im asking this question to increase my understanding on how evolution works. So if we were able to stop aging and live for a very long time, would I eventually evolve into a different species, or does this only happen when you keep having new individuals over and over?
Phi for All Posted April 28, 2022 Posted April 28, 2022 Evolution is changes in allele frequency within a population over time. It would be your children and their children that continue to evolve. 2
joigus Posted April 28, 2022 Posted April 28, 2022 Just to add "cautionary tales of evolution" to what @Phi for All said, The male praying mantis is, in terms of evolution, very successful. Yet, he does it by providing the female with a delicious romantic dinner after sex in which he is the main and only course. Think about the implications of this. Evolution only cares about reproductive success. Doing well for yourself doesn't necessarily matter so much. Fig wasps are an even more extreme example. There are more examples of reproductive champion = individual loser in Nature. In tournament species, successful males are tipically short-lived. 2
Genady Posted April 28, 2022 Posted April 28, 2022 To be able to live for millions of years while interacting with environment, you'd have to evolve. It wouldn't be a Darwinian evolution, but rather evolution in a generic sense of changing in time. Simply because the environment changes in time.
Area54 Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 On 4/28/2022 at 10:43 PM, Genady said: Simply because the environment changes in time. Although, if one had the technology to live for millions of years, maintaining a stable environment shouldn't be much of a challenge. Or changing it and yourself to suit your latest whim.
MigL Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 On 4/28/2022 at 5:26 PM, joigus said: Fig wasps are an even more extreme example. Being from south-central Italy, I love fresh figs. Imagine my horror when I found out all figs contain 'digested' wasp remnants. Then, the disgust when I found out honey is actually bee 'puke'. I got over it. 1
Peterkin Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 On 4/28/2022 at 5:43 PM, Genady said: To be able to live for millions of years while interacting with environment, you'd have to evolve. You would have to adapt. Your distant progeny would evolve.
Genady Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 7 minutes ago, Peterkin said: You would have to adapt. Your distant progeny would evolve. On 4/28/2022 at 5:43 PM, Genady said: It wouldn't be a Darwinian evolution, but rather evolution in a generic sense of changing in time.
Peterkin Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 1 hour ago, Genady said: evolution in a generic sense How do you change your own genes?
Genady Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 Just now, Peterkin said: How do you change your own genes? This is specific for a biological evolution. In a generic sense, evolution is any process of change. Like in: the universe evolves, stars evolve, my understanding evolves, etc.
iNow Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 3 minutes ago, Peterkin said: How do you change your own genes? One leg at a time. (Works better when spoken) I see Genady already replied, but even in a biological sense answering this is easy. For example… Radioactivity would work, and gene expressions change based on behavior as per epigenetics, for example.
Peterkin Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 Oh, I see now. You might grow extra limbs or sense organs as needed? How long would it take to turn something as complex as human into another kind of life-form? Would a million years be enough?
Genady Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 On 4/28/2022 at 5:43 PM, Genady said: To be able to live for millions of years while interacting with environment, you'd have to evolve. From this ^^^, if you can't evolve, you can't live for millions of years. If A⇒B then ¬B⇒¬A . OTOH, if you can stop the environment from evolving, you don't need to evolve either. Re: 3 hours ago, Area54 said: Although, if one had the technology to live for millions of years, maintaining a stable environment shouldn't be much of a challenge. Or changing it and yourself to suit your latest whim.
joigus Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 2 hours ago, MigL said: Being from south-central Italy, I love fresh figs. Imagine my horror when I found out all figs contain 'digested' wasp remnants. Then, the disgust when I found out honey is actually bee 'puke'. I got over it. Oh. I think that's because you're a bit particular about insects. I'd love to have a male fig-wasp tell me if this is a good deal: 1) Be born 2) Have sex 3) Die and be digested by your house They don't even know what having a meal is like. Yet, they've been around for hundreds of millions of years. Far longer than primates. But we humans have come up with and interesting alternative to 3): Buy a house, be digested by your bank, and die. 1
iNow Posted May 7, 2022 Posted May 7, 2022 1 hour ago, Peterkin said: Oh, I see now. You might grow extra limbs or sense organs as needed? How long would it take to turn something as complex as human into another kind of life-form? Would a million years be enough? You’re also unfamiliar with gene editing, and viruses I take it? Snark doesn’t magically make me wrong. 😂
Peterkin Posted May 8, 2022 Posted May 8, 2022 56 minutes ago, iNow said: You’re also unfamiliar with gene editing, and viruses I take it? Not intimately familiar, no. But I do have the general impression that the editing is done by an external agency, not the virus itself. It's not snark: I just don't understand. For a moment, I thought I did, but then couldn't fit the idea of radiation-induced mutation with adaptation to a changing environment, with the figurative use of 'evolution' as it refers to the unfolding of a process. Just don't see how it works as a natural development in an individual. I never said you were wrong; I asked for more information.
Peterkin Posted May 8, 2022 Posted May 8, 2022 5 hours ago, joigus said: Buy a house, be digested by your bank, and die. You still get to have sex, though, right?
joigus Posted May 8, 2022 Posted May 8, 2022 4 hours ago, Peterkin said: You still get to have sex, though, right? If you're being digested by a bank? You've earned it!
dimreepr Posted May 8, 2022 Posted May 8, 2022 This reminds me of a conversation between two redwoods, as described by Terry Pratchett, "Burr that, winter, was a cold one"...
beecee Posted May 8, 2022 Posted May 8, 2022 9 hours ago, dimreepr said: This reminds me of a conversation between two redwoods, as described by Terry Pratchett, "Burr that, winter, was a cold one"... But don't expect Octopuses to turn into space-faring entities any time soon!!!😁
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now