McReaperL24 Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 God does exist and you will regret all later I tell you. You can deny if you want, but is true and you can not do anything about it. You are men so you know very little, while I am Guardian and I know too much than what men can handle. Ban me already. And time travel does exist and also the supernatural. I understand if you do not understand. -1
Phi for All Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 23 minutes ago, McReaperL24 said: Ban me already. ! Moderator Note We're going to wait a week, travel back in time a week, and THEN ban you. 2
Externet Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 1 hour ago, McReaperL24 said: ...you will regret all later... Mister guardian, who is "you" ? Me or all of us ? Because I have not done anything to deserve your attitude that I will regret something. And what has to be done to avoid regretting whatever you mean ?
studiot Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 Go easy on the poor soul, PHI, he's just been watching too many marvel movies during lockdown. +1 1
Intoscience Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 7 hours ago, McReaperL24 said: God does exist and you will regret all later I tell you. You can deny if you want, but is true and you can not do anything about it. You are men so you know very little, while I am Guardian and I know too much than what men can handle. Ban me already. And time travel does exist and also the supernatural. I understand if you do not understand. Help us understand please Guardian.
exchemist Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 31 minutes ago, Intoscience said: Help us understand please Guardian. If he doesn't, we may have to resort to the Telegraph. 2
Phi for All Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 5 hours ago, studiot said: Go easy on the poor soul, PHI, he's just been watching too many marvel movies during lockdown. +1 They need to take better notes then. They should have been able to evade a ban using either time travel or "the supernatural". Or God. This is just intellectually lazy. God is obviously not spending enough on Guardian training. The turnover is brutal!
Peterkin Posted June 28, 2022 Posted June 28, 2022 Too many fresh new uneducated souls coming in. That'll stop now, thanks be to SCOTUS.
Ni Mimi. Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 Matthew 7:1 "Do not judge, or you will be judged. - Bible Hub; are you God’s spokesman to make the deduction that others’re going to regret? No offence intended, but if you were God, what would do if people chose their own paths other than that which you, perhaps, may’ve in mind?
Moontanman Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 (edited) 20 hours ago, Ni Mimi. said: Matthew 7:1 "Do not judge, or you will be judged. - Bible Hub; are you God’s spokesman to make the deduction that others’re going to regret? No offence intended, but if you were God, what would do if people chose their own paths other than that which you, perhaps, may’ve in mind? I certainly wouldn't send them to hell for simply not believing. Can you give any evidentiary support for a god much less your version of god? Edited June 30, 2022 by Moontanman
Arete Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 Give that you loved Adam and Eve absolutely, and being omniscient you knew the snake would trick Eve - who had no concept of good or evil - into eating the apple precipitating the fall of man, why didn't you like, flick the serpent into the sun and put the tree of knowledge on top of an un-climable mountain or something?
Phi for All Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 1 hour ago, Arete said: Give that you loved Adam and Eve absolutely, and being omniscient you knew the snake would trick Eve - who had no concept of good or evil - into eating the apple precipitating the fall of man, why didn't you like, flick the serpent into the sun and put the tree of knowledge on top of an un-climable mountain or something? You don't even have to make the mountain unclimbable if the knowledge of mountain climbing is learned from the tree. This god seems like a scheming old white guy trying to deflect blame onto imagined villains and keep us bickering among ourselves so he can stay in power.
Ni Mimi. Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 At this realm of mankind that we do find ourselves in, to the extent that we can process rational thought, then it can be presupposed that it’s upon man in the usage of reason to know what constitutes the boundaries of that which is right and wrong hence act in accordance with that which is just, in order to maintain interpersonal relations that’re empathic to the next person. It’s in the context of the foregoing protocol of human relations, that institution’s’re built and norms of engagement’re established. As such, on the basis of the above, I can’t attribute to myself aspects that seem to be judgmental without according the other side, some space to be…to be to the extent that that leeway doesn’t interfere with my right to be; to think, to live to the best of my potential. Because by judging, do I start to infringe on the other’s rights by limiting their freedom to think and hence, express themselves. Unshackling you begins with me allowing you to think. -1
studiot Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 I was under the impression that there is a religion section in this forum for discussing the scientific aspect of religion, not for expounding individual religous beliefs. 1
Moontanman Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 2 hours ago, Ni Mimi. said: At this realm of mankind that we do find ourselves in, to the extent that we can process rational thought, then it can be presupposed that it’s upon man in the usage of reason to know what constitutes the boundaries of that which is right and wrong hence act in accordance with that which is just, in order to maintain interpersonal relations that’re empathic to the next person. It’s in the context of the foregoing protocol of human relations, that institution’s’re built and norms of engagement’re established. As such, on the basis of the above, I can’t attribute to myself aspects that seem to be judgmental without according the other side, some space to be…to be to the extent that that leeway doesn’t interfere with my right to be; to think, to live to the best of my potential. Because by judging, do I start to infringe on the other’s rights by limiting their freedom to think and hence, express themselves. Unshackling you begins with me allowing you to think. So you have no evidence a god exists?
Recommended Posts