Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/AMSsymbols.js
Jump to content

The Universe in Pictures as you've never seen it Before

Kartazion

By Kartazion
in Speculations

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kartazion

Kartazion

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hello,

Here are in pictures of the evolution of the universe as you've probably never seen it.

 

image.png



image.png.0231cd3d5e407a07bbeea6604faaccb8.png

 

References:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by Kartazion
Bufofrog

Bufofrog

Posted
Posted

Those are graphs not 'pictures'.  I have seen it before.  You've never been able to give a reasonable explanation of what you think these graphs represent.

Kartazion

Kartazion

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
  On 8/3/2022 at 12:43 PM, Bufofrog said:

I have seen it before. 

Expand  

Everyone knows you're unable to provide a source for what you're saying. You put yourself in a very awkward position. Now I'm waiting to see what you're going to answer me.

  On 8/3/2022 at 12:43 PM, Bufofrog said:

You've never been able to give a reasonable explanation of what you think these graphs represent.

Expand  

I can easily explain each of these points.

I start with the simplest with the example relates to the "Hole Through the Earth Simple Harmonic Motion".

The functioning of our universe and atomic is based on the oscillation of the particle itself and asymmetrically between matter and antimatter. This mechanism is a classical an-harmonic oscillator and uses a linear oscillation of the particle, where the energy can be represented by the graph of a potential well followed by the principle and law of conservation of energy between the kinetic energy and potential energy. This an-harmonic oscillation therefore occurs with a gravitational oscillator (see "Hole Through the Earth Simple Harmonic Motion"). This linear gravitational oscillator in the following figure uses a particle of mass m oscillating vertically along the gravity vector G. The oscillation has two phases. The first is the falling phase of the particle with its Potential Energy PE and the second is the reverse phase which corresponds to the Kinetic Energy KE. It is from the center of the Earth that what is in Potential Energy is transformed into Kinetic Energy and is reversed at the level at the point of origine 0 or x=0.

Gravitational_Oscillator_&_law_of_Conser

Potential Energy - Kinetic Energy = 0

References:
1. John. D. Barrow; Mariusz. P. Dabrowski; Oscillating universes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro nomical Society 1995, 275, 850-862, 10.1093/mnras/275.3.850. [82] [83] [84]
2. Yun-Song Piao; Yuan-Zhong Zhang; Inflation in oscillating universe. Nuclear Physics B 2005, 725 , 265-274, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.07.021.
3. Itzhak Goldman; Nathan Rosen; Gravitation Theory and Oscillating Universe. Physical Review D 1972, 5, 1285-1287, 10.1103/physrevd.5.1285.
4. Roy A. Briere; LHCb Collaboration; Observing Matter-Antimatter Oscillations. Physics 2013, 6, 1- 3, 10.1103/physics.6.26.
5. M.K. Parida; Natural mass scales for observable matter-antimatter oscillations in SO(10). Physics Letters B 1983, 126, 220-224, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90594-4
9. Andrew J. Simoson; Falling down a Hole through the Earth. Mathematics Magazine 2004, 77, 17 1, 10.2307/3219113.
10. Journey through the center of the Earth . Hyperphysics. Retrieved 2022-7-28

Edited by Kartazion
Bufofrog

Bufofrog

Posted
Posted
  On 8/3/2022 at 4:21 AM, Kartazion said:

Everyone knows you're unable to provide a source for what you're saying. You put yourself in a very awkward position. Now I'm waiting to see what you're going to answer me.

Expand  

You posted it on another site and I saw it.

  On 8/3/2022 at 2:54 PM, Kartazion said:

I can easily explain each of these points.

I start with the simplest with the example relates to the "Hole Through the Earth Simple Harmonic Motion".

Expand  

That doesn't have anything to do with the graphs that supposedly show the 'evolution of the universe'.

So you still have not explained what the graphs in the OP are suppose to mean.  The graphs are not in any normal format that I have ever seen, so an explanation would be very helpful.

Kartazion

Kartazion

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 8/3/2022 at 3:48 PM, Bufofrog said:

You posted it on another site and I saw it.

Expand  

Okay. Well done. But coming from me you've never seen it before. By ambiguity this brought confusion for the reader of a fact that this graph already existed. But it's not.

  On 8/3/2022 at 3:48 PM, Bufofrog said:

That doesn't have anything to do with the graphs that supposedly show the 'evolution of the universe'.

Expand  

On the contrary, dear friend. We must already begin with the beginning. But ok it is the gravitational singularity of the Big-Bang which allows to develop the energy of current potential energy of the universe. So?

Phi for All

Phi for All

Posted
Posted
  On 8/3/2022 at 3:48 PM, Bufofrog said:

So you still have not explained what the graphs in the OP are suppose to mean.  The graphs are not in any normal format that I have ever seen, so an explanation would be very helpful.

Expand  

I noticed this request was ignored by the OP... again. They quoted all the rest of your post but skipped any actual substance. Going back over their other posts, this is a familiar pattern. If it continues in this thread, I'll report it and maybe we can either get some clarification or we can get it to stop.

Kartazion

Kartazion

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
  On 8/3/2022 at 3:48 PM, Bufofrog said:

So you still have not explained what the graphs in the OP are suppose to mean. 

Expand  

It represents the evolution of the universe through the anharmonic oscillator.

  On 8/3/2022 at 3:48 PM, Bufofrog said:

The graphs are not in any normal format that I have ever seen, so an explanation would be very helpful.

Expand  

https://medium.com/predict/the-oscillating-universe-d259ab408433

1*E4grX-QNP-0gEreBiw1dmA.gif

  On 8/3/2022 at 4:08 PM, Phi for All said:

If it continues in this thread, I'll report it ..

Expand  

To who? 

You are in the denial of reality.

  On 8/3/2022 at 4:08 PM, Phi for All said:

... and maybe we can either get some clarification ...

Expand  

https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9904313
In a recent paper Damour and Mukhanov describe a scenario where inflation may continue during the oscillatory phase. This effect is possible because the scalar field spends a significant fraction of each period of oscillation on the upper part of the potential. Such additional period of inflation could push perturbations after the slow roll regime to observable scales. 

Anharmonic_Oscillator_&_Bifurcation_&_En

Edited by Kartazion
Bufofrog

Bufofrog

Posted
Posted
  On 8/3/2022 at 3:58 PM, Kartazion said:

On the contrary, dear friend. We must already begin with the beginning. But ok it is the gravitational singularity of the Big-Bang which allows to develop the energy of current potential energy of the universe. So?

Expand  

I'm trying to understand the graphs in the OP.  I guess you need specific questions.

On the legend for the Y-axis you have the words inflation and energy.  Both inflation and energy have up arrows so I assume that the 2 quantities are increasing.

Does the Y-axis have 2 continuous values, both inflation and energy?  Or does the bottom half of the graph use inflation as a Y-axis and the top of the graph use Energy for the Y axis?  What are the units of inflation?  What does it mean for inflation to increase?  What Energy are you talking about?

Hopefully, you will be able to clarify these items which will be a start.

Kartazion

Kartazion

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
  On 8/3/2022 at 6:38 PM, Bufofrog said:

 I guess you need specific questions.

Expand  

Yes exactly.

  On 8/3/2022 at 6:38 PM, Bufofrog said:

On the legend for the Y-axis you have the words inflation and energy.  Both inflation and energy have up arrows so I assume that the 2 quantities are increasing.

Does the Y-axis have 2 continuous values, both inflation and energy?  Or does the bottom half of the graph use inflation as a Y-axis and the top of the graph use Energy for the Y axis?  What are the units of inflation?  What does it mean for inflation to increase?  What Energy are you talking about?

Expand  

This is inflation through the gravitational singularity energy potential. Of course the energy is that of potential through its density.

https://universe-review.ca/R02-13-inflation.htm
I02-35-theories.jpg
https://ppt-online.org/180450

slide-2.jpg

Edited by Kartazion
joigus

joigus

Posted
Posted
  On 8/3/2022 at 2:54 PM, Kartazion said:

The functioning of our universe and atomic is based on the oscillation of the particle itself and asymmetrically between matter and antimatter.

Expand  

Are you implying that charge is not conserved?

 

Kartazion

Kartazion

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
  On 8/3/2022 at 8:42 PM, joigus said:

Are you implying that charge is not conserved?

Expand  

The symmetry breaking is located at x=0 at the level of the gravitational singularity. The charge and the parity CP are inverted between matter and antimatter. 

CP-symmetry states that the laws of physics should be the same if a particle is interchanged with its antiparticle (C-symmetry) while its spatial coordinates are inverted ("mirror" or P-symmetry).

The oscillation of the particle between matter and antimatter gives the characteristic of an asymmetric distribution.
 

image.thumb.png.8deb26a5af11a0b2c50649933849b81f.png

Edited by Kartazion
Bufofrog

Bufofrog

Posted
Posted
  On 8/3/2022 at 8:01 PM, Kartazion said:

This is inflation through the gravitational singularity energy potential.

Expand  

That is not very helpful. 

On your graph does the inflation end where the arrow ends or is inflation represented by the entire Y-axis?  So on the Y-axis where you have E, you really mean energy density?

It would really help me to understand the graphs if you answered my questions.

Kartazion

Kartazion

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
  On 8/3/2022 at 9:11 PM, Bufofrog said:

That is not very helpful. 

On your graph does the inflation end where the arrow ends or is inflation represented by the entire Y-axis?  So on the Y-axis where you have E, you really mean energy density?

It would really help me to understand the graphs if you answered my questions.

Expand  

This is expressed in relation to the potential often denoted v.

image.png.02c9be1b6c87c18297710920402cec04.png

https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Liddle/Liddle5_1.html
 

One can think of the first term in each as a kinetic energy, and the second as a potential energy. The potential energy V(phi) can be thought of as a form of `configurational' or `binding' energy; it measures how much internal energy is associated with a particular field value. Normally, like all systems, scalar fields try to minimize this energy; however, a crucial ingredient which allows inflation is that scalar fields are not always very efficient at reaching this minimum energy state.

Note in passing that a scalar field cannot in general be described by an equation of state; there is no unique value of p that can be associated with a given rho as the energy density can be divided between potential and kinetic energy in different ways.

In a given theory, there would be a specific form for the potential V(phi), at least up to some parameters which one could hope to measure (such as the effective mass and interaction strength of the scalar field). However, we are not presently in a position where there is a well established fundamental theory that one can use, so, in the absence of such a theory, inflation workers tend to regard V(phi) as a function to be chosen arbitrarily, with different choices corresponding to different models of inflation (of which there are many). Some example potentials are

 

Equation 35 (35)
Equation 36 (36)
Equation 37 (37)

 

The strength of this approach is that it seems possible to capture many of the crucial properties of inflation by looking at some simple potentials; one is looking for results which will still hold when more `realistic' potentials are chosen. Figure 3 shows such a generic potential, with the scalar field displaced from the minimum and trying to reach it.



figure3.jpeg

Edited by Kartazion
Bufofrog

Bufofrog

Posted
Posted

Your just not going to answer my questions?  I don't understand your reluctance.

Since you seem adverse to discussing the Y-axis, could you at least state what the X-axis is, it is not labeled.  Is it the radius of the universe?

swansont

swansont

Posted
Posted
  On 8/3/2022 at 2:54 PM, Kartazion said:

Everyone knows you're unable to provide a source for what you're saying. You put yourself in a very awkward position. Now I'm waiting to see what you're going to answer me.

Expand  
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.