The Universe in Pictures as you've never seen it Before

[Kartazion]

Hello,

Here are in pictures of the evolution of the universe as you've probably never seen it.

 

 

References:

Spoiler

1. John. D. Barrow; Mariusz. P. Dabrowski; Oscillating universes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro nomical Society 1995, 275, 850-862, 10.1093/mnras/275.3.850. [82] [83] [84]
2. Yun-Song Piao; Yuan-Zhong Zhang; Inflation in oscillating universe. Nuclear Physics B 2005, 725 , 265-274, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.07.021.
3. Itzhak Goldman; Nathan Rosen; Gravitation Theory and Oscillating Universe. Physical Review D 1972, 5, 1285-1287, 10.1103/physrevd.5.1285.
4. Roy A. Briere; LHCb Collaboration; Observing Matter-Antimatter Oscillations. Physics 2013, 6, 1- 3, 10.1103/physics.6.26.
5. M.K. Parida; Natural mass scales for observable matter-antimatter oscillations in SO(10). Physics Letters B 1983, 126, 220-224, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90594-4.
6. Iberê Kuntz; Roberto Casadio; Singularity avoidance in quantum gravity. Physics Letters B 2020, 802, 135219, 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135219.
7. V Husain; Singularity avoidance, lattices, and quantum gravity. Canadian Journal of Physics 200 8, 86, 583-586, 10.1139/p07-201.
8. J Brunnemann; T Thiemann; On (cosmological) singularity avoidance in loop quantum gravity. Cl assical and Quantum Gravity 2006, 23, 1395-1427, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/5/001.
9. Andrew J. Simoson; Falling down a Hole through the Earth. Mathematics Magazine 2004, 77, 17 1, 10.2307/3219113.
10. Journey through the center of the Earth . Hyperphysics. Retrieved 2022-7-28
11. C. A. Coulson; R. P. Bell; Kinetic energy, potential energy and force in molecule formation. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1945, 41, 141-149, 10.1039/tf9454100141.
12. Robert C. Hilborn; Galilean Transformations of Kinetic Energy, Work, and Potential Energy. The P hysics Teacher 2019, 57, 40-43, 10.1119/1.5084927.
13. William D. Harkins; The Change of Molecular Kinetic Energy into Molecular Potential Energy. Pro ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1919, 5, 539-546, 10.1073/pnas.5.12.539.
14. R. H. Schwendeman; Comparison of Experimentally Derived and Theoretically Calculated Deriva tives of the Energy, Kinetic Energy, and Potential Energy for CO. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1966, 44, 2115-2119, 10.1063/1.1726989.
15. R. F. Snider; Conversion between kinetic energy and potential energy in the classical nonlocal Bo ltzmann equation. Journal of Statistical Physics 1995, 80, 1085-1117, 10.1007/bf02179865.
16. Rory O. Rafi Y. Thompson; Efficiency of conversion of kinetic energy to potential energy by a bre aking internal gravity wave. Journal of Geophysical Research 1980, 85, 6631, 10.1029/jc085ic11p06631.
17. Timothy H Boyer; Quantum zero-point energy and long-range forces. Annals of Physics 1970, 5 6, 474-503, 10.1016/0003-4916(70)90027-8.
18. Hristu Culetu; The zero point energy and gravitation. arXiv 2004, 1, 1-18, 10.48550/arXiv.hep-t h/0410133.
19. Jevgenijs Kaupuzs; Energy fluctuations and the singularity of specific heat in a 3D Ising model. S econd International Symposium on Fluctuations and Noise 2004, 1, 480-491, 10.1117/12.54649 3.
20. John D. Barrow; Robert J. Scherrer; Constraining density fluctuations with big bang nucleosynthe sis in the era of precision cosmology. Physical Review D 2018, 98, 043534, 10.1103/physrevd.98.043534.
21. M. Giovannini; M. E. Shaposhnikov; Primordial Magnetic Fields, Anomalous Matter-Antimatter Flu ctuations, and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Physical Review Letters 1998, 80, 22-25, 10.1103/phy srevlett.80.22.
22. Kouji Nakamura; Shigelu Konno; Yoshimi Oshiro; Akira Tomimatsu; Quantum Fluctuations of Blac k Hole Geometry. Progress of Theoretical Physics 1993, 90, 861-870, 10.1143/ptp.90.861.
23. Jianwei Mei; Fluctuating black hole horizons. Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 2013, 195, 1 0.1007/jhep10(2013)195.
24. Tomohiro Takahashi; Jiro Soda; Hawking radiation from fluctuating black holes. Classical and Qu antum Gravity 2010, 27, 1-35, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/17/175008.
25. The hydrogen atom with an origin centred singularity . ResearchGate. Retrieved 2022-7-28
26. How is Matter Ejected from an Event Horizon Around a Black Hole? . The National Radio Astrono my Observatory. Retrieved 2022-7-28
27. Don N Page; Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics. New Journal of Physics 2005, 7 , 203-203, 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/203.
28. Gilad Gour; A J M Medved; Thermal fluctuations and black-hole entropy. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2003, 20, 3307-3326, 10.1088/0264-9381/20/15/303.
29. A Marasco; G Cresci; L Posti; F Fraternali; F Mannucci; A Marconi; F Belfiore; S M Fall; A universal relation between the properties of supermassive black holes, galaxies, and dark matter haloes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2021, 507, 4274-4293, 10.1093/mnras/stab2 317.
30. Andrew King; The Supermassive Black Hole—Galaxy Connection. null 2013, 49, 427-451, 10.10 07/978-1-4939-2227-7_21.
31. Luca Fabbri; Black Hole singularity avoidance by the Higgs scalar field. The European Physical Jo urnal C 2018, 78, 1028, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6505-6.
32. Marcelo Gleiser; Metastability in the early Universe. Physical Review D 1990, 42, 3350-3361, 10 .1103/physrevd.42.3350.
33. Katherine J. Mack; Robert McNees; Bounds on extra dimensions from micro black holes in the co ntext of the metastable Higgs vacuum. Physical Review D 2019, 99, 063001, 10.1103/physrevd. 99.063001.
34. Itzhak Bars; Paul J. Steinhardt; Neil Turok; Cyclic cosmology, conformal symmetry and the metas tability of the Higgs. Physics Letters B 2013, 726, 50-55, 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.071.
35. Nikolaos Tetradis; Black holes and Higgs stability. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016, 2016, 036-036, 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/036.
36. Bernhard Haisch; Alfonson Rueda; H.E. Puthoff; Physics of the zero-point field: implications for in ertia, gravitation and mass. Speculations in Science and Technology 1997, 20, 99-114, 10.1023/ a:1018516704228.
37. Bo Song; Shovan Dutta; Shaurya Bhave; Jr-Chiun Yu; Edward Carter; Nigel Cooper; Ulrich Schnei der; Realizing discontinuous quantum phase transitions in a strongly correlated driven optical la ttice. Nature Physics 2022, 18, 259-264, 10.1038/s41567-021-01476-w.
38. Are We on the Brink of the Higgs Abyss? . Physcis. Retrieved 2022-7-31
39. E.M Henley; High energy diffractive dissociation of pions and the A1. Annals of Physics 1971, 63 , 541-548, 10.1016/0003-4916(71)90027-3.
40. Krishnanand Sinha; On the oscillator strength and the dissociation energy of CN molecules. Rese archGate 1986, 1, 1-6, .
41. J. Hussels; N. Hölsch; C.-F. Cheng; E. J. Salumbides; H. L. Bethlem; K. S. E. Eikema; Ch. Jungen; M . Beyer; F. Merkt; W. Ubachs; et al. Improved ionization and dissociation energies of the deuteriu m molecule. Physical Review A 2022, 105, 022820, 10.1103/physreva.105.022820.
42. C. H. L. Goodman; Ionic-Covalent Bonding in Crystals. Nature 1960, 187, 590-591, 10.1038/187 590a0.
43. John Bannister Goodenough; First-order changes in ionic/covalent bonding. Ferroelectrics 1992, 130, 77-86, 10.1080/00150199208019535.
44. E.V. Kolontsova; Å.â. Êîëîíöîâà; Radiation-induced states in crystals with ionic-covalent bonds. Us pekhi Fizicheskih Nauk 1987, 151, 149-172, 10.3367/ufnr.0151.198701g.0149.
45. Weizhang Huang; Weishi Liu; Yufei Yu; Permanent charge effects on ionic flow: a numerical study of flux ratios and their bifurcation. arXiv 2020, 1, 1-31, 10.48550/arXiv.2003.11223.
46. Giulia L. Celora; Matthew G. Hennessy; Andreas Münch; Barbara Wagner; Sarah L. Waters; The d ynamics of a collapsing polyelectrolyte gel. null 2021, 1, 1-34, 10.48550/arXiv.2105.06495.
47. M. B. Fröb; C. Rein; R. Verch; Graviton corrections to the Newtonian potential using invariant obs ervables. Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 2022, 1-29, 10.1007/jhep01(2022)180.
48. Lintao Tan; Nikolaos Christos Tsamis; Richard Paul Woodard; How Inflationary Gravitons Affect th e Force of Gravity. Universe 2022, 8, 376, 10.3390/universe8070376.
49. Mark Kowitt; Gravitational repulsion and Dirac antimatter. International Journal of Theoretical Ph ysics 1996, 35, 605-631, 10.1007/bf02082828.
50. Tong Bor Tang; Li Zhi Fang; The cosmic asymmetry in matter-antimatter. Vistas in Astronomy 19 84, 27, 1-23, 10.1016/0083-6656(84)90010-2.
51. Anonymous; Universe Preceded by an Antiuniverse?. Physics 2018, 11, 1, 10.1103/physics.11.s147.
52. S.J. Robles-Pérez; Quantum Creation of a Universe–Antiuniverse Pair. Acta Physica Polonica B Pro ceedings Supplement 2020, 13, 1-7, 10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.13.325.
53. R. L. Jaffe; Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum. Physical Review D 2005, 72, 021301, 10.11 03/physrevd.72.021301.
54. Gilles Cohen-Tannoudji; The de Broglie universal substratum, the Lochak monopoles and the dar k universe. arXiv 2015, 1, 1-20, 10.48550/arXiv.1507.00460.
55. Four reasons why the quantum vacuum may explain dark matter . PhysOrg.com. Retrieved 2022 -7-28 56. Antonio Capolupo; Quantum Vacuum, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Spontaneous Supersymme try Breaking. Advances in High Energy Physics 2018, 2018, 1-7, 10.1155/2018/9840351.
57. Dragan Slavkov Hajdukovic; Quantum vacuum and dark matter. Astrophysics and Space Science 2011, 337, 9-14, 10.1007/s10509-011-0938-9.
58. Davide Castelvecchi; New type of dark energy could solve Universe expansion mystery. Nature 2021, 1, 1, 10.1038/d41586-021-02531-5.
59. Eric V. Linder; Dark Energy, Expansion History of the Universe, and SNAP. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS. MATERIALS WITH MULTILEVEL HIER ARCHICAL STRUCTURE AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY” 2003, 655, 193-207, 10.1063/1.1543500.
60. Jacob Schaf; dark energy expansion. Universal Journal of Physics and Application 2015, 9, 182-1 87, 10.13189/ujpa.2015.090403.
61. Dragan Huterer; David Kirkby; Rachel Bean; Andrew Connolly; Kyle Dawson; Scott Dodelson; Au gust Evrard; Bhuvnesh Jain; Michael Jarvis; Eric Linder; et al. Growth of cosmic structure: Probin g dark energy beyond expansion. Astroparticle Physics 2014, 63, 23-41, 10.1016/j.astropartphy s.2014.07.004.
62. Gang Xin; Peng Wang; Exploring superposition state in multi-scale quantum harmonic oscillator algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 2021, 107, 107398, 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107398.
63. Eva Zakka-Bajjani; François Nguyen; Minhyea Lee; Leila R. Vale; Raymond W. Simmonds; Jose Au mentado; Quantum superposition of a single microwave photon in two different ’colour’ states. Nature Physics 2011, 7, 599-603, 10.1038/nphys2035.
64. Martin J. Renner; Časlav Brukner; Computational Advantage from a Quantum Superposition of Q ubit Gate Orders. Physical Review Letters 2022, 128, 230503, 10.1103/physrevlett.128.230503.
65. P. A. Cook; Meson coupling constants in a quark model. Il Nuovo Cimento A Series 10 1967, 48, 570-572, 10.1007/bf02818032.
66. Fujio Takagi; Meson-Baryon Coupling Constants in the Quark Model. Progress of Theoretical Phys ics 1967, 37, 1047-1048, 10.1143/ptp.37.1047.
67. E. M. Henley; T. Oka; J. D. Vergados; Meson-nucleon coupling constants in a quark model. Few-B ody Systems 1990, 9, 75-87, 10.1007/bf01091699.
68. R. Brout; From asymptotic freedom to quark confinement. Nuclear Physics B 1988, 310, 127-14 0, 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90057-0.
69. Kei-Ichi Kondo; Abelian-Projected Effective Gauge Theory of QCD with Asymptotic Freedom and Quark Confinement. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 1998, 131, 243-255, 10.1143/ptps.131.243.
70. Kanako Yamazaki; T. Matsui; Gordon Baym; Entropy in the quark–hadron transition. Nuclear Phys ics A 2015, 933, 245-255, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.10.046.
71. David Dudal; Subhash Mahapatra; Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below d econfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model. Physical Review D 2017, 96, 126010, 10.1103/physrevd.96.126010.
72. Tri Quoc Truong; Tadashi Tsubone; Munehisa Sekikawa; Naohiko Inaba; Border-collision bifurcatio ns and Arnol’d tongues in two coupled piecewise-constant oscillators. Physica Nonlinear Phen omena 2019, 401, 132148, 10.1016/j.physd.2019.132148.
73. D Gabor; Plasma oscillations. British Journal of Applied Physics 1951, 2, 209-218, 10.1088/0508- 3443/2/8/301.
74. Toshio Nakayama; Irreversibility in Plasmas: Entropy Production. Progress of Theoretical Physics 1974, 51, 77-81, 10.1143/ptp.51.77.
75. Ettore Minardi; Minardi, E. Thermodynamics of High Temperature Plasmas. Entropy, 2009, 11, 1 24-221. Entropy 2009, 11, 457-462, 10.3390/e11030457.
76. R. Shankar; Determination of the quark-gluon coupling constant. Physical Review D 1977, 15, 7 55-758, 10.1103/physrevd.15.755.
77. M. A. Braun; Reggeized gluons with a running coupling constant. Physics Letters B 1995, 348, 1 90-195, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00101-p.
78. M. Althoff; W. Braunschweig; F.J. Kirschfink; K. Lübelsmeyer; H.-U. Martyn; J. Rimkus; P. Rosskam p; H.G. Sander; D. Schmitz; H. Siebke; et al. Experimental test of the flavor independence of the quark-gluon coupling constant. Physics Letters B 1984, 138, 317-324, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)9 1668-x.
79. Lawrence Slifkin; Entropy and the Frequency of a Harmonic Oscillator. American Journal of Physi cs 1965, 33, 408-408, 10.1119/1.1971569.
80. N. Fornengo; C. Giunti; C.W. Kim; J. Song; Gravitational effects on the neutrino oscillation in vacu um. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 1999, 70, 264-266, 10.1016/s0920-5632(98) 00435-6.
81. Quantum Field and 2nd Quantization (2021 Edition) . universe-review.ca. Retrieved 2022-7-29
82. Anharmonic Oscillator . GitHub. Retrieved 2022-8-2
83. Damiano Anselmi; Purely Virtual Particles in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Collid er Physics. Symmetry 2022, 14, 521, 10.3390/sym14030521.
84. Janne Mikael Karimäki; Virtual Particle Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics - a non-dualistic mo del of QM with a natural probability interpretation. arXiv 2012, 1, 1-8, 10.48550/arXiv.1206.123 7.

 

Edited August 3, 2022 by Kartazion

[Bufofrog]

Those are graphs not 'pictures'.  I have seen it before.  You've never been able to give a reasonable explanation of what you think these graphs represent.

[Kartazion]

2 hours ago, Bufofrog said:

I have seen it before. 

Everyone knows you're unable to provide a source for what you're saying. You put yourself in a very awkward position. Now I'm waiting to see what you're going to answer me.

2 hours ago, Bufofrog said:

You've never been able to give a reasonable explanation of what you think these graphs represent.

I can easily explain each of these points.

I start with the simplest with the example relates to the "Hole Through the Earth Simple Harmonic Motion".

The functioning of our universe and atomic is based on the oscillation of the particle itself and asymmetrically between matter and antimatter. This mechanism is a classical an-harmonic oscillator and uses a linear oscillation of the particle, where the energy can be represented by the graph of a potential well followed by the principle and law of conservation of energy between the kinetic energy and potential energy. This an-harmonic oscillation therefore occurs with a gravitational oscillator (see "Hole Through the Earth Simple Harmonic Motion"). This linear gravitational oscillator in the following figure uses a particle of mass m oscillating vertically along the gravity vector G. The oscillation has two phases. The first is the falling phase of the particle with its Potential Energy PE and the second is the reverse phase which corresponds to the Kinetic Energy KE. It is from the center of the Earth that what is in Potential Energy is transformed into Kinetic Energy and is reversed at the level at the point of origine 0 or x=0.



Potential Energy - Kinetic Energy = 0

References:
1. John. D. Barrow; Mariusz. P. Dabrowski; Oscillating universes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro nomical Society 1995, 275, 850-862, 10.1093/mnras/275.3.850. [82] [83] [84]
2. Yun-Song Piao; Yuan-Zhong Zhang; Inflation in oscillating universe. Nuclear Physics B 2005, 725 , 265-274, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.07.021.
3. Itzhak Goldman; Nathan Rosen; Gravitation Theory and Oscillating Universe. Physical Review D 1972, 5, 1285-1287, 10.1103/physrevd.5.1285.
4. Roy A. Briere; LHCb Collaboration; Observing Matter-Antimatter Oscillations. Physics 2013, 6, 1- 3, 10.1103/physics.6.26.
5. M.K. Parida; Natural mass scales for observable matter-antimatter oscillations in SO(10). Physics Letters B 1983, 126, 220-224, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90594-4
9. Andrew J. Simoson; Falling down a Hole through the Earth. Mathematics Magazine 2004, 77, 17 1, 10.2307/3219113.
10. Journey through the center of the Earth . Hyperphysics. Retrieved 2022-7-28

Edited August 3, 2022 by Kartazion

[Bufofrog]

11 hours ago, Kartazion said:

Everyone knows you're unable to provide a source for what you're saying. You put yourself in a very awkward position. Now I'm waiting to see what you're going to answer me.

You posted it on another site and I saw it.

50 minutes ago, Kartazion said:

I can easily explain each of these points.

I start with the simplest with the example relates to the "Hole Through the Earth Simple Harmonic Motion".

That doesn't have anything to do with the graphs that supposedly show the 'evolution of the universe'.

So you still have not explained what the graphs in the OP are suppose to mean.  The graphs are not in any normal format that I have ever seen, so an explanation would be very helpful.

[Kartazion]

9 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

You posted it on another site and I saw it.

Okay. Well done. But coming from me you've never seen it before. By ambiguity this brought confusion for the reader of a fact that this graph already existed. But it's not.

10 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

That doesn't have anything to do with the graphs that supposedly show the 'evolution of the universe'.

On the contrary, dear friend. We must already begin with the beginning. But ok it is the gravitational singularity of the Big-Bang which allows to develop the energy of current potential energy of the universe. So?

[Phi for All]

17 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

So you still have not explained what the graphs in the OP are suppose to mean.  The graphs are not in any normal format that I have ever seen, so an explanation would be very helpful.

I noticed this request was ignored by the OP... again. They quoted all the rest of your post but skipped any actual substance. Going back over their other posts, this is a familiar pattern. If it continues in this thread, I'll report it and maybe we can either get some clarification or we can get it to stop.

[Kartazion]

1 hour ago, Bufofrog said:

So you still have not explained what the graphs in the OP are suppose to mean. 

It represents the evolution of the universe through the anharmonic oscillator.

1 hour ago, Bufofrog said:

The graphs are not in any normal format that I have ever seen, so an explanation would be very helpful.

https://medium.com/predict/the-oscillating-universe-d259ab408433

55 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

If it continues in this thread, I'll report it ..

To who? 

You are in the denial of reality.

55 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

... and maybe we can either get some clarification ...

https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9904313
In a recent paper Damour and Mukhanov describe a scenario where inflation may continue during the oscillatory phase. This effect is possible because the scalar field spends a significant fraction of each period of oscillation on the upper part of the potential. Such additional period of inflation could push perturbations after the slow roll regime to observable scales. 

Edited August 3, 2022 by Kartazion

[Bufofrog]

2 hours ago, Kartazion said:

On the contrary, dear friend. We must already begin with the beginning. But ok it is the gravitational singularity of the Big-Bang which allows to develop the energy of current potential energy of the universe. So?

I'm trying to understand the graphs in the OP.  I guess you need specific questions.

On the legend for the Y-axis you have the words inflation and energy.  Both inflation and energy have up arrows so I assume that the 2 quantities are increasing.

Does the Y-axis have 2 continuous values, both inflation and energy?  Or does the bottom half of the graph use inflation as a Y-axis and the top of the graph use Energy for the Y axis?  What are the units of inflation?  What does it mean for inflation to increase?  What Energy are you talking about?

Hopefully, you will be able to clarify these items which will be a start.

[Kartazion]

1 hour ago, Bufofrog said:

 I guess you need specific questions.

Yes exactly.

1 hour ago, Bufofrog said:

On the legend for the Y-axis you have the words inflation and energy.  Both inflation and energy have up arrows so I assume that the 2 quantities are increasing.

Does the Y-axis have 2 continuous values, both inflation and energy?  Or does the bottom half of the graph use inflation as a Y-axis and the top of the graph use Energy for the Y axis?  What are the units of inflation?  What does it mean for inflation to increase?  What Energy are you talking about?

This is inflation through the gravitational singularity energy potential. Of course the energy is that of potential through its density.

https://universe-review.ca/R02-13-inflation.htm

https://ppt-online.org/180450

Edited August 3, 2022 by Kartazion

[joigus]

5 hours ago, Kartazion said:

The functioning of our universe and atomic is based on the oscillation of the particle itself and asymmetrically between matter and antimatter.

Are you implying that charge is not conserved?

 

[Kartazion]

29 minutes ago, joigus said:

Are you implying that charge is not conserved?

The symmetry breaking is located at x=0 at the level of the gravitational singularity. The charge and the parity CP are inverted between matter and antimatter. 

CP-symmetry states that the laws of physics should be the same if a particle is interchanged with its antiparticle (C-symmetry) while its spatial coordinates are inverted ("mirror" or P-symmetry).

The oscillation of the particle between matter and antimatter gives the characteristic of an asymmetric distribution.
 

Edited August 3, 2022 by Kartazion

[Bufofrog]

56 minutes ago, Kartazion said:

This is inflation through the gravitational singularity energy potential.

That is not very helpful. 

On your graph does the inflation end where the arrow ends or is inflation represented by the entire Y-axis?  So on the Y-axis where you have E, you really mean energy density?

It would really help me to understand the graphs if you answered my questions.

[Kartazion]

6 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

That is not very helpful. 

On your graph does the inflation end where the arrow ends or is inflation represented by the entire Y-axis?  So on the Y-axis where you have E, you really mean energy density?

It would really help me to understand the graphs if you answered my questions.

This is expressed in relation to the potential often denoted v.

https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Liddle/Liddle5_1.html
 

One can think of the first term in each as a kinetic energy, and the second as a potential energy. The potential energy V() can be thought of as a form of `configurational' or `binding' energy; it measures how much internal energy is associated with a particular field value. Normally, like all systems, scalar fields try to minimize this energy; however, a crucial ingredient which allows inflation is that scalar fields are not always very efficient at reaching this minimum energy state.

Note in passing that a scalar field cannot in general be described by an equation of state; there is no unique value of p that can be associated with a given  as the energy density can be divided between potential and kinetic energy in different ways.

In a given theory, there would be a specific form for the potential V(), at least up to some parameters which one could hope to measure (such as the effective mass and interaction strength of the scalar field). However, we are not presently in a position where there is a well established fundamental theory that one can use, so, in the absence of such a theory, inflation workers tend to regard V() as a function to be chosen arbitrarily, with different choices corresponding to different models of inflation (of which there are many). Some example potentials are

 

	(35)
	(36)
	(37)

 

The strength of this approach is that it seems possible to capture many of the crucial properties of inflation by looking at some simple potentials; one is looking for results which will still hold when more `realistic' potentials are chosen. Figure 3 shows such a generic potential, with the scalar field displaced from the minimum and trying to reach it.

Edited August 3, 2022 by Kartazion

[Bufofrog]

Your just not going to answer my questions?  I don't understand your reluctance.

Since you seem adverse to discussing the Y-axis, could you at least state what the X-axis is, it is not labeled.  Is it the radius of the universe?

[swansont]

6 hours ago, Kartazion said:

Everyone knows you're unable to provide a source for what you're saying. You put yourself in a very awkward position. Now I'm waiting to see what you're going to answer me.

!

Moderator Note

That we’ve seen this before?

https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/122571-associate-a-harmonic-oscillator-with-the-functioning-of-the-universe/#comment-1147154

https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/120416-anharmonic-oscillator/page/11/#comment-1140394

https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/125640-unification-of-quantum-mechanics-by-qft-and-gravitational-oscillator-revision-of-the-higgs-potential-in-the-higgs-field-in-relation-to-singularity-avoidance-and-correction-of-the-metastability-of-the-true-false-vacuum/#comment-1184138

And threads were locked, with you being told not to bring the subject up again