Jump to content

Origins of Natural Order (split from super string theory)


RSolomon

Recommended Posts

 

                          Origins of Natural Order

                               

                                     A Strong Bond Between Geometry, Mathematics, and Physics

                                                                     

                                                                 S. Solomon © 2022

 

 

Abstract:

An omission occurred during the early development of our formal geometric knowledge, it was a notable Problem that lacked a satisfactory Solution, which was eventually set aside and nearly forgotten about over time. Since then, the many advances in geometry, mathematics, and physics now constitute the rigor, logic & laws of today’s natural science. Nevertheless, that ancient geometric omission remains obscure & unresolved, thus leaving a gap in continuity of the geometric foundation that underpins natural science. Such an oversight would foreseeably carry over into the subsequent fields of study that depend on the wholeness of the geometric foundation. If the foundation is in some real way incomplete, it will naturally hinder a more complete understanding of the relationships that exist within & between those fields of research.

The assertion here, is that the body of geometric knowledge was & still is incomplete, i.e., the Problem. The Problem will be adequately demonstrated, followed by a remarkable Solution, one that will lend new insight into the bonds between natural geometry, mathematics, and physics.

If interested in matter... please discuss it here per the rules

Edited by Phi for All
email removed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RSolomon said:

 

                          Origins of Natural Order

                               

                                     A Strong Bond Between Geometry, Mathematics, and Physics

                                                                     

                                                                 S. Solomon © 2022

 

 

Abstract:

An omission occurred during the early development of our formal geometric knowledge, it was a notable Problem that lacked a satisfactory Solution, which was eventually set aside and nearly forgotten about over time. Since then, the many advances in geometry, mathematics, and physics now constitute the rigor, logic & laws of today’s natural science. Nevertheless, that ancient geometric omission remains obscure & unresolved, thus leaving a gap in continuity of the geometric foundation that underpins natural science. Such an oversight would foreseeably carry over into the subsequent fields of study that depend on the wholeness of the geometric foundation. If the foundation is in some real way incomplete, it will naturally hinder a more complete understanding of the relationships that exist within & between those fields of research.

The assertion here, is that the body of geometric knowledge was & still is incomplete, i.e., the Problem. The Problem will be adequately demonstrated, followed by a remarkable Solution, one that will lend new insight into the bonds between natural geometry, mathematics, and physics.

If interested in matter... email solomon56700@gmail.com

This is liable to be considered a hijack of another post. Why don't you open a new thread instead?

Quote

Keep alternative science and your own personal conjecture to the appropriate forum (Speculations). Threads in the ordinary science forums should be answered with ordinary science, not your own personal hypothesis. Posting pet "theories" in mainstream science forums is considered thread hijacking.

https://www.scienceforums.net/guidelines/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Excuse me! I am new to this and will avoid inappropriate posts!

Best Practices: Best practices tell us that when an anticipated Solution to a Problem remains stubbornly unresolved, it is time to go back over the supporting evidence to determine if something had been overlooked or left amiss there - if so, then address & correct the discrepancy before returning to the original Problem, where a Solution may then become more workable. Or - solve the simplest underlying Problems first!

Solomon

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations, since this sounds like non-mainstream ideas. Please do your best to support your assertions, using mainstream science, to bring them above the level of hand-waving. Be specific, and if you have "a remarkable solution", do everyone a favor and START WITH THAT. We're looking to see if your idea has merit, and we'd love to discuss it if it does, but we want some evidence that your concept reflects what we observe in nature.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.