jlivingstonsg Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 Hi. I hade one speculation/discussion here, but it got locked. Do anyone know of any forum where I can speculate and discuss wildly, about space/time and quantum physics without being locked out and where there is people who know about gravitational waves, general relativity and quantum physics who can help me get any of my thought experiments discussed, if they can be anything of interest ? Regards MagI --------------------------------
Ghideon Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 (edited) 33 minutes ago, jlivingstonsg said: Do anyone know of any forum where I can speculate and discuss wildly, about space/time and quantum physics without being locked out and where there is people who know about gravitational waves, general relativity and quantum physics who can help me get any of my thought experiments discussed, if they can be anything of interest ? This forum is an excellent place for discussions but fails on some of your requirements; you need to have some support or evidence when introducing new ideas that has no connection to established theories or models. If you drop the word "wildly" and focus on formulating thought experiments in a coherent way you may have fruitful discussions with experts here on scienceforums, no need to move on. Anyway, my experience tells me wild* discussions means people who know a topic (physics for instance) quickly loose interest; their knowledge and valuable input is often neglected and they chose to spend their efforts on other things. Your requirements are somewhat mutually exclusive on the forums I'm familiar with. *) WAG, unsupported claims, obviously invalid ideas etc... Edited September 9, 2022 by Ghideon adding sentence. grammar
jlivingstonsg Posted September 9, 2022 Author Posted September 9, 2022 --------------------------- I just believe I have an ability to vizualise quite complicated things. I am a Swedish Master in 3D Tetris and is globaly ranked as number 25. I have had this idea of space/time pulses that build up our universe as the quantum fields. When string theory developed I hoped it would be a way for me to get my ideas in mathematic form. Especially when Edward Witten (1998 ?) showed that string theories was better explained as vibrating membranes or branes. I hoped my space/time pulses was these vibrating membranes and finaly had a mathematical explanation on my idea. I even tried to discuss it with 3 nobel price winners in physics, that visited Lund where I took my M.Sc. in Engineering Physics. I did not get any interest from any of them. But I still can not let go of this idea that big bang created space/time pulses that in its peak got stuck in zero time so they stayed in this peak state, because of its zero time. They are stuck in that zero time of peak in these pulses. These pulses still expand out in normal speed of light , wobbeling and vibrating and they are these quantum fields. We are then built up by these vibrating pulses and get our normal space time by the vibrating pulses. I believe these pulses was created as transversal pulses and longitudinal pulses but also as shearing in space time. And that shearing of space/time is what is called spin of the particles. Its like if you have a planet that create a "frame dragging" but as a sudden twist and the created space/time shear pulse created of this sudden "frame dragging" create two sides of this shear pulse. One side expanding as a positive spin and the other as a negative spin. Then we have the other part where these space/time pulses get infinitely fast time. They explain all these quantum entanglements and double slit experimants. The time inside of them pulses is much faster so they are everywhere at the same time according to us in normal time. I just would like to find some people who find this interesting and would like to try to help me get this in any kind of mathematic language. I my self believe it can be done with the mathematics of general relativity. But all this is hanging on one question. Could the big bang create space/time pulses that in its peaks, made time stop or go infinitely fast in time. Anyone ? Regards MagI --------------------------------------------------------
Ghideon Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 (edited) 44 minutes ago, jlivingstonsg said: I even tried to discuss it with 3 nobel price winners in physics, that visited Lund where I took my M.Sc. in Engineering Physics. I did not get any interest from any of them. But I still can not let go of this idea that big bang created space/time pulses that in its peak got stuck in zero time so they stayed in this peak state, because of its zero time. The physics taught at M.Sc. level, at least where I live, should make it trivial to see that the idea is incorrect. Maybe that explains the lack if interest? 44 minutes ago, jlivingstonsg said: But all this is hanging on one question. Could the big bang create space/time pulses that in its peaks, made time stop or go infinitely fast in time. Short answer: No I think the presentation also failed both of my suggestions: 1 hour ago, Ghideon said: If you drop the word "wildly" and focus on formulating thought experiments in a coherent way Edited September 9, 2022 by Ghideon grammar. added paragraph answering question.
Phi for All Posted September 9, 2022 Posted September 9, 2022 34 minutes ago, jlivingstonsg said: --------------------------- I just believe I have an ability to vizualise quite complicated things. I am a Swedish Master in 3D Tetris and is globaly ranked as number 25. I have had this idea of space/time pulses that build up our universe as the quantum fields. When string theory developed I hoped it would be a way for me to get my ideas in mathematic form. Especially when Edward Witten (1998 ?) showed that string theories was better explained as vibrating membranes or branes. I hoped my space/time pulses was these vibrating membranes and finaly had a mathematical explanation on my idea. I even tried to discuss it with 3 nobel price winners in physics, that visited Lund where I took my M.Sc. in Engineering Physics. I did not get any interest from any of them. But I still can not let go of this idea that big bang created space/time pulses that in its peak got stuck in zero time so they stayed in this peak state, because of its zero time. They are stuck in that zero time of peak in these pulses. These pulses still expand out in normal speed of light , wobbeling and vibrating and they are these quantum fields. We are then built up by these vibrating pulses and get our normal space time by the vibrating pulses. I believe these pulses was created as transversal pulses and longitudinal pulses but also as shearing in space time. And that shearing of space/time is what is called spin of the particles. Its like if you have a planet that create a "frame dragging" but as a sudden twist and the created space/time shear pulse created of this sudden "frame dragging" create two sides of this shear pulse. One side expanding as a positive spin and the other as a negative spin. Then we have the other part where these space/time pulses get infinitely fast time. They explain all these quantum entanglements and double slit experimants. The time inside of them pulses is much faster so they are everywhere at the same time according to us in normal time. I just would like to find some people who find this interesting and would like to try to help me get this in any kind of mathematic language. I my self believe it can be done with the mathematics of general relativity. But all this is hanging on one question. Could the big bang create space/time pulses that in its peaks, made time stop or go infinitely fast in time. Anyone ? Regards MagI -------------------------------------------------------- We have standards here. You need to be able to explain your ideas in mainstream science terms, otherwise it's just another wild-ass guess. And the core of the scientific method is you can't leap from guess to guess, you need solid ground for the foundation of any explanation for a phenomenon. If you stay, you should ask more questions. The biggest problem here is that you aren't trying to learn from the responses you've been getting. Instead, you just want to "prove" your idea is right. You think because you are good with a 3-D game, you have special scientific insights. You're ignoring what others have said about the topic you introduced, and still think it will just take someone else to work the math to model what seems so intuitive to you. And that's another problem: since you made it up without using science and maths, it only makes sense to you. You haven't been able to explain it in a way that some of our members who THINK in maths can engage with. Your ideas resonate only with you. You should easily be able to find some wild west forums out there who don't care about methodology. They might not be moderated, but hopefully they'll be civil and give you a listen. Sorry, but we're not even the strictest science forum out there, and most of the members here want to talk about mainstream.
Recommended Posts