New Universe Theory

[universeteory]

This model was created by emphasizing that the universe is filled with Ether (Ether) as Nikola Tesla said. If we can step outside of the universe and look, we can see that the vibrations in the video below are in an order as they have created. If you want to solve the secrets of the universe, as Nikola Tesla said, think of energy as frequency and vibration. Also, it says that if you knew the grandeur of the numbers 3, 6 and 9, you would solve the mystery of the universe, and we know in the Qur'an that the universe was created in 6 periods. 369, 396, 639, 693, 936, 963 .....

The universe had a diameter of more than 93 billion light-years. There was no matter, that is, atoms, only the Ether. When the captive is compressed, it can transform into the smallest building block of matter (RA+). The universe was compressed from a radius of maybe 300, maybe 500 billion light-years to a much smaller diameter than it is now. In this universe, compressed to a diameter of maybe 5, maybe 10 billion light years, there are only particles that make up the atom and Ether. First vibration was given to the universe for the diversity of matter and atoms were formed. The force we call the nuclear bond is this vibration. Then the second vibration was given and the elements were formed. Then the third vibration was given and the planets stars etc. The apparent universe was formed. And this is the force we call gravity, and explosions started in the stars. Everything is in order, but everything is in its place. With the fourth vibration, the rotation started and black holes were formed.

What is Light?

Light is fluctuations in the ether matter. Light is not the fluctuating motion of particles called photons. For the nuclear force, it's like ripples for gravity. It's just different wavelengths. Could it be that man's creation from light is his essence being a captive substance? Stars only vibrate at the frequency we need to see, and we call these vibrations light. You can magnify the light spectrum by adding gravitational frequency, nuclear force frequency, and other vibrational levels. In fact, all of them are the effect of the fluctuations in the Ether on matter.

Stars are only there for us to see, they are not the cause of warming. The reason for the temperature is the location where the stars are located. That place is the point where the vibrations peak, so to speak, where there is a repulsive force intense enough to fuse the hydrogen atoms together. As a matter of fact, Allah has said in the Qur'an:

“I swear by the places of the stars—it really is a great oath, if you know.”

“He (Allah) has created the stars in the darkness of the land and the sea so that you can find a way with them. We explain (such) the verses for a people who understand."

What is temperature

Temperature is the vibration level of gravity, that is, the repulsive force at this frequency, on atoms. When you increase the temperature of the atom, you actually increase its vibration. You know, in the known universe model, everything was energy at a single point and it exploded, then dispersed into the universe and cooled and formed matter, then what is COOLING? What is called energy, how can it cool down? Energy is just a unit we can measure. The atom is not derived from pure energy, but from Ether. Why does it cool when you heat an individual, why does it solidify when you melt it, and why does it melt when we solidify it? Because everything is under the influence of the gravitational frequency. When you heat it, the vibrational level is brought back by the effect of the gravitational frequency of the atoms whose frequency changes. Remember vibrations are still being given to the universe. As a result, matter tends to return to its normal state in the universe with the effect of vibrations in the gravitational frequency.

In reality, nothing flows from order to disorder, as the laws of physics say, on the contrary, everything moves towards the order in which it was first created in the universe. Vitality is disrupting this order.

What is Gravity

 Gravity is the vibration at the frequency given when the universe was first established. Gravity is the force that holds everything together. In the video above, you can see how vibration and particles come together. You can think of it as the waves crashing against the shore carrying the materials to the shore. The repulsive force acting on matter is at the atomic level. It is this force that keeps our body, any object, planets, stars, and planets and stars in balance together. Planets are not being pushed or pulled towards a heavier object in the fabric of space-time. Every object is in the position assigned to it by this vibration. Atoms and objects do not have repulsive forces to attract each other, they are neutral against each other.

“Generations later, our machines will run on energy from any point in the universe.” Tesla

Any point in this universe will come true when we succeed in translating vibrations at the frequency of gravitational or nuclear force, the force that binds the atoms that make up the atom, into any form of energy we desire.

Black Holes and the Expansion of the Universe

Black holes are matter transformation centers. At first there were only Captives (RA-) in the universe. Then, with the compression of the universe, the building blocks of the atom, RA+s, were formed. The universe, which took its shape after vibrations at a certain frequency, formed black holes with the beginning of the rotation movement. Black holes transform matter into Ether, and as a result, the universe expands with increasing volume. Imagine that the repulsive force in stars is so strong that it fuses atoms together. In the same way, matter under the influence of the centrifugal force created by the repulsion force and rotation in black holes turns back into Ether. We can liken black holes to eddies in water.

[Bufofrog]

10 minutes ago, universeteory said:

Also, it says that if you knew the grandeur of the numbers 3, 6 and 9, you would solve the mystery of the universe, and we know in the Qur'an that the universe was created in 6 periods. 369, 396, 639, 693, 936, 963 .....

Mixing religion into the science sections does not bode well...

You don't seem to actually have a model of the universe it appears you have some speculations about the universe.

[joigus]

This should go in the Speculations section, @universeteory. Welcome to the forums.

Also, religion has never helped science, it's always stood in its way, as far as I know.

[Phi for All]

1 hour ago, joigus said:

This should go in the Speculations section, @universeteory. Welcome to the forums.

Also, religion has never helped science, it's always stood in its way, as far as I know.

We have a problem with discussions like this breaking various rules. Non-mainstream ideas should be in Speculations, and discussions about religion from a science perspective go in Religion, and neither section allows bad reasoning and logical fallacies, and require that evidence be cited to back up assertions. This doesn't meet the requirements of Speculations, and you can't use unsupported scientific claims to make your arguments in Religion. If the science requires supernatural support, it's not science, and we shouldn't be wasting our time discussing something that isn't supported by observation and evidence. 

[joigus]

6 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

We have a problem with discussions like this breaking various rules. Non-mainstream ideas should be in Speculations, and discussions about religion from a science perspective go in Religion, and neither section allows bad reasoning and logical fallacies, and require that evidence be cited to back up assertions. This doesn't meet the requirements of Speculations, and you can't use unsupported scientific claims to make your arguments in Religion. If the science requires supernatural support, it's not science, and we shouldn't be wasting our time discussing something that isn't supported by observation and evidence. 

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I've sometimes thought that (even) religious issues should be discussed under the light of scientific evidence (archaeology, literary criticism, history, etc.) But I understand the difficulty of reaching a compromise here.

[universeteory]

Hello You focused on the wrong thing. remove religion and focus on other information please

[exchemist]

1 hour ago, universeteory said:

Hello You focused on the wrong thing. remove religion and focus on other information please

You mention ether, Tesla and vibrations in your first sentence. That’s a terrible start. I stopped reading at that point.

[studiot]

4 hours ago, universeteory said:

Hello You focused on the wrong thing. remove religion and focus on other information please

Well I take this as an admission that you got it wrong so well done as that's difficult to do +1.

Now take this opportunity the Moderator has provided to draw a line, ask the Moderstor to close this - perhaps to the trash can - and start again including only essential topics to make a scientific point.

You will always then have plenty of opportunity to develop this in further threads if anything useful comes of it.

Oh and did I say "read the rules" (ask the mod if you don't knoe wher to find them)  you did after all agree them them when you joined.

Edited October 6, 2022 by studiot

[universeteory]

5 hours ago, exchemist said:

You mention ether, Tesla and vibrations in your first sentence. That’s a terrible start. I stopped reading at that point.

You can get rid of prejudices

[exchemist]

12 minutes ago, universeteory said:

You can get rid of prejudices

Indeed. However in science there is one ineradicable prejudice, if you care to call it that, which is a prejudice in favour of models that are built on, and testable by, observation of nature. If you come forward with a model which does not have those characteristics, it isn't science.  It could be metaphysics, poetry, religion, fantasy or nonsense, but science it is not.  

Ether cranks and Tesla cranks are two a penny on the internet. You would well to disassociate yourself from such people if you want to be taken seriously.

And energy is not "vibrations". Energy is a quantity, assigned to physical systems according to a rule e.g. force x distance, with dimensions ML²T².  It is a property of systems. Vibrations are a behaviour of certain kinds of systems. A vibrating system is one of many kinds of system that has energy as one of its properties, but energy cannot be said to be vibration.

That is why I stopped reading.   

 

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

Since we're omitting the religion I've moved this to speculations, but as has been pointed out, you need to develop a model and present evidence or tests that could be conducted.

 

How do we detect this aether? Are we at rest or are we moving through it? How do you explain the experiments that say we are not at rest nor moving through it? (rather than concluding that there is no aether)