New why we exist theory

[hbbaboy]

a human has tiny cells in his skin or where ever all over the whole human is made of cells 

so today i thought about the earth

came to conclusion that earth is a cell

a long time ago when the earth was in fire millions to billion years ago the earth cell was cancer 

then later the earth turned into a healthy cell because it had glaciers and cleaner air so the earth cell became a healthy cell

just like a  cell in the human body its tiny

so the earth must be a tiny cell to a larger bigger being

[iNow]

Maybe. How can we test whether this is true?

[hbbaboy]

hey inow 

 

i dont know how we can test it i think the best way the future has to reveal it 

future technology etc

 

because are technology right now cant even barely come out of the earth cell best we can do is mars and moon exploring 

so im not sure how we can escape the earth cell even further until  future technology permits

[iNow]

49 minutes ago, hbbaboy said:

dont know how we can test it

Then you’re writing fun fiction, not science 

[zapatos]

 

[studiot]

9 hours ago, hbbaboy said:

a human has tiny cells in his skin or where ever all over the whole human is made of cells 

so today i thought about the earth

came to conclusion that earth is a cell

a long time ago when the earth was in fire millions to billion years ago the earth cell was cancer 

then later the earth turned into a healthy cell because it had glaciers and cleaner air so the earth cell became a healthy cell

just like a  cell in the human body its tiny

so the earth must be a tiny cell to a larger bigger being

 

Well I don't think this speculation should be lightly dismissed.

On the other hand I think that it is as simple as you make out.

We already have terminology for things which display the characteristics which define what makes a particular type of cell.

But we have more general terminology starting with the word system.

And cells represent particular types of system, but not the type you seem to be thinking of.

The Earth can certainly (and often is) regarded as a system for some purpose or other  - there are many types of system.

So I suggest to you, since it is your speculation, that you consider recasting your thoughts in this more conventional terminology, so you can have more profitable discussions with others.

The basic characteristics of a system is something we can draw a boundary around which divides the system from the rest of the universe, also called the surroundings.
Properties, processes and objcts that are wholly inside the system, wholly outside the system and cross the boundary as a result of interaction between the system and its surroundings can then be identified and evaluated.
This model is a very powerful tool.

[studiot]

1 hour ago, studiot said:

On the other hand I think that it is as simple as you make out.

My apologies this should read

On the other hand I don't think that it is as simple as you make out.