vrus Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 In Beta negative decay, a neutron changes into a proton and elctron and the electron is emmitted with a neutrino. Where does the neutrino come from ? Wouldn't that make the element a cation (+ve)? In Beta positive decay, a proton converts into a neutron, releasing a positron and an anti-neutrino. Is the reverse possible ? As in will a high energy positron colliding (or by any other method) with a neutron form a proton again ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 The neutrino and positron, or antineutrino and electron, are created in the interaction that changes a down quark to an up quark, or vice-versa. This interaction is mediated by the W-boson, which is quite massive (~ 80.5 GeV) and thus has a very short range (i.e. have a small cross-section). The resultant nucleus will typically have an extra electron or deficit, depending on the interaction, but will eventually neutralize; that's at the atomic level and a relatively unimportant consideration in this context. The reverse interaction is possible (antineutrino + proton -> neutron + positron) and is exploited in some types of neutrino detectors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Tycho?] Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 You've got your decays mixed up. Beta netative decay is N -> p + e- + antineutrino. Beta positive is p -> N + positron + neutrino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 '']You've got your decays mixed up. Beta netative decay is N -> p + e- + antineutrino. Beta positive is p -> N + positron + neutrino (I missed that). To vrus: The problem is that it is an antineutrino paired with the electron, so that lepton number is conserved. Also: Since the emitted particles' spins are well-defined with their momenta and if the nuclear spin doesn't change in the decay, and since the decay is mediated by a vector Boson, the particles cannot be emitted back-to-back; in that alignment, they'd have to be emitted in the same direction. That sprang to mind because I was just visiting the lab where we did that experiment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Mattson Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 In Beta negative decay' date=' a neutron changes into a proton and elctron and the electron is emmitted with a neutrino. Where does the neutrino come from ? Wouldn't that make the element a cation (+ve)? [/quote'] Just a minor point: I don't think that you will find the product of that reaction referred to as a "cation" in any of the literature. That term is used in chemistry for an ion whose charge is made positive by removing electrons, not by converting neutrons into protons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DQW Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 I suspect the OP believes the neutrino carries a charge. Neutrinos (and antineutrinos) are chargeless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 I suspect the OP believes the neutrino carries a charge. Neutrinos (and antineutrinos) are chargeless. I thought the OP was just looking at the neutron/proton conversion. In reality' date=' the emitted electron or positron can strip away additional electrons. In the beta decay experiment I cited, there were Ar neutrals , Ar[sup']+[/sup], Ar2+ and Ar3+ even though you'd expect only Ar- from a simple conservation of charge analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now