Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm kindof wondering this... this is the question (Extra Credit)...

 

The following function is continuous at one and only one point. x=0. Prove it's continutity...

 

f(x)=0 when x is rational & fx^2 when x is irrational.

 

To prove a function is continuous at a point n...

 

1) f(n) must exist

2) [math]\lim_{x \to n}{f(x)}[/math] must exist.

3) [math]\lim_{x \to n}{f(x)}=f(n)[/math]

 

f(0)=0.

[math]\lim_{x \to 0}{f(x)}=0[/math] I have no idea how to prove this, but I know it's true because the question says that it's continous, and f(0) has to equal the limit, so the limit must be 0, but I don't know how to do this limit...

 

I know how to do the limit on a composition of functions, but this baffles me. anyone able to help?

Posted

You are talking about f(x) = x² for x irrational, are you?

 

If I remember it correctly, convergation lim(x->0) f(x) = 0 demands that for all e>0, there is a d so that for all x in (-d, d) : |f(x)|<e.

Splitting up the reals into rationals and irrationals you see that this is trivially true for all rationals as 0<(e>0). For the irrationals in (-d, d) you have f(x) < d². Therefore you get the condition d²<e => d < sqrt(e). Since for all sqrt(e>0) there exists a d that satisfies this condition, your convergation criterion is fullfilled.

Posted

isn't there another way to do it? He specifically told us that epsilon and delta proofs wouldn't EVER be used in this class... (then again, he assigned a problem on a quiz that required L'Hopital rule while still learning limits, as in no deriviatives)

 

The hint he gave us was the squeze theorm... I don't understand what it is from reading the book though...

 

and kx^2 for all x that are irrational doesn't have a limit (or a value) at x=0. Or so I was taught... because the graph is just a bunch of points, and it jumps around so much (because it also is the graph x=0 for rational) there is no limit at any number, but that this one is special and has a limit as x goes to 0, and is continious at x=0 (because the lines x=0, and kx^2 converge at 0)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.